Acceptability of self-administered antigen test for COVID-19 in the Philippines.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care Pub Date : 2024-01-17 DOI:10.1017/S0266462324000035
Jayne Eunice U Yang, Faisal H Jackarain, Tisha Isabelle M de Vergara, Joshua F Santillan, Patrick Wincy C Reyes, Ma Cecilia Victoria B Arellano, Jainor Timothy U Garcia, Sheena Jasley G Samonte, Anne Julienne G Marfori, Anna Melissa S Guerrero
{"title":"Acceptability of self-administered antigen test for COVID-19 in the Philippines.","authors":"Jayne Eunice U Yang, Faisal H Jackarain, Tisha Isabelle M de Vergara, Joshua F Santillan, Patrick Wincy C Reyes, Ma Cecilia Victoria B Arellano, Jainor Timothy U Garcia, Sheena Jasley G Samonte, Anne Julienne G Marfori, Anna Melissa S Guerrero","doi":"10.1017/S0266462324000035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In response to the Omicron surge in early 2022, the HTA Philippines evaluated the acceptability of Filipinos in using self-administered antigen tests (SAAgTs) as part of COVID-19 HTAs in the Philippines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Scoping review from literature databases was initially conducted to identify preset codes in the use of SAAgT. Preset codes were used to establish the questions for focus group discussions (FGDs). Semi-structured questionnaires were created through Delphi technique. FGDs with four stakeholder groups (i.e., nine healthcare workers [HCWs], seven representatives of at-risk groups, six economic frontliners, and seven representatives of micro-small-medium-sized enterprises) were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Discomfort in being a target of stigma and being prescribed an \"illness identity\" when suspected or confirmed COVID-19-positive, along with lack of confidence to perform self-test, caused hesitancy in self-testing among participants. The need for subsidies for test kits from the government or employers was emphasized to increase its accessibility. Having a designated access point and reporting system for SAAgT was highlighted to avoid nepotism (<i>padrino</i> system attributed to debt of gratitude), inequitable distribution, and lapses in reporting. A participatory approach to education was perceived as crucial to reduce any misconceptions associated with the use of SAAgT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All FGD groups expressed favorable reviews on the implementation of SAAgT because it can potentially reduce the burden of health facility-administered tests. These findings were considered by the HTA Council in the recommendation of SAAgT as part of the overarching national strategies for the diagnosis and screening of COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462324000035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In response to the Omicron surge in early 2022, the HTA Philippines evaluated the acceptability of Filipinos in using self-administered antigen tests (SAAgTs) as part of COVID-19 HTAs in the Philippines.

Methods: Scoping review from literature databases was initially conducted to identify preset codes in the use of SAAgT. Preset codes were used to establish the questions for focus group discussions (FGDs). Semi-structured questionnaires were created through Delphi technique. FGDs with four stakeholder groups (i.e., nine healthcare workers [HCWs], seven representatives of at-risk groups, six economic frontliners, and seven representatives of micro-small-medium-sized enterprises) were conducted.

Results: Discomfort in being a target of stigma and being prescribed an "illness identity" when suspected or confirmed COVID-19-positive, along with lack of confidence to perform self-test, caused hesitancy in self-testing among participants. The need for subsidies for test kits from the government or employers was emphasized to increase its accessibility. Having a designated access point and reporting system for SAAgT was highlighted to avoid nepotism (padrino system attributed to debt of gratitude), inequitable distribution, and lapses in reporting. A participatory approach to education was perceived as crucial to reduce any misconceptions associated with the use of SAAgT.

Conclusions: All FGD groups expressed favorable reviews on the implementation of SAAgT because it can potentially reduce the burden of health facility-administered tests. These findings were considered by the HTA Council in the recommendation of SAAgT as part of the overarching national strategies for the diagnosis and screening of COVID-19.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
菲律宾人对 COVID-19 抗原自测法的接受程度。
目标:为应对 2022 年初的 Omicron 疫潮,菲律宾 HTA 评估了菲律宾人使用自控抗原检测(SAAgT)的可接受性,作为 COVID-19 HTA 在菲律宾的一部分:方法:首先对文献数据库进行了范围审查,以确定使用 SAAgT 的预设代码。预设代码用于确定焦点小组讨论 (FGD) 的问题。通过德尔菲技术制作了半结构化问卷。与四个利益相关者群体(即九名医护人员、七名高危群体代表、六名经济前线人员和七名微型-小型-中型企业代表)进行了焦点小组讨论:结果表明:COVID-19 被怀疑或被确认为阳性时,参与者对自己成为污名化的目标和被赋予 "疾病身份 "感到不安,同时缺乏进行自我检测的信心,这导致他们在进行自我检测时犹豫不决。与会者强调,需要政府或雇主为检测包提供补贴,以提高其可获得性。与会者强调,应为 SAAgT 建立一个指定的接入点和报告系统,以避免裙带关系(Padrino 系统被认为是为了报恩)、分配不公和报告失误。参与式教育方法被认为是减少与使用 SAAgT 相关的任何误解的关键:所有 FGD 小组都对 SAAgT 的实施给予了好评,因为它有可能减轻医疗机构管理的检测负担。HTA 委员会在推荐将 SAAgT 作为诊断和筛查 COVID-19 的国家总体战略的一部分时考虑了这些结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
期刊最新文献
Development of an MCDA Framework for Rare Disease Reimbursement Prioritization in Malaysia. Experiences of patient organizations' involvement in medicine appraisal and reimbursement processes in Finland - a qualitative study. PP78 Real-World Trends And Medical Costs Of Stroke After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation In Korea: A Nationwide, Population-Based Study Can requests for real-world evidence by the French HTA body be planned? An exhaustive retrospective case-control study of medicinal products appraisals from 2016 to 2021. A systematic review of the cost and cost-effectiveness of immunoglobulin treatment in patients with hematological malignancies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1