Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Anastomotic Leakage after Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Q4 Medicine Journal of Chest Surgery Pub Date : 2024-03-05 Epub Date: 2024-01-17 DOI:10.5090/jcs.23.114
Hyo Won Seo, Yeong Jeong Jeon, Jong Ho Cho, Hong Kwan Kim, Yong Soo Choi, Jae Ill Zo, Young Mog Shim
{"title":"Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Anastomotic Leakage after Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.","authors":"Hyo Won Seo, Yeong Jeong Jeon, Jong Ho Cho, Hong Kwan Kim, Yong Soo Choi, Jae Ill Zo, Young Mog Shim","doi":"10.5090/jcs.23.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anastomotic leakage (AL) following esophagectomy represents a serious complication that often results in prolonged hospitalization and necessitates repeated interventions, including nothing-by-mouth (NPO) restriction, endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT), or surgical repair. In this study, we evaluated the patterns and outcomes of AL treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer at a single center between 2003 and 2020. Of 3,096 examined cases, 181 patients (5.8%) with AL were included in the study: 114 patients (63%) with cervical anastomosis (CA) and 67 (37%) with intrathoracic anastomosis (TA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of AL was 11.9% in the CA and 3.2% in the TA group (p<0.001). Among patients with CA who developed AL, 87 (76.3%) were managed with NPO, 15 (13.2%) with EVT, and 12 (10.5%) with surgical repair. Over 90% of patients with cervical AL resumed an oral diet by the time of discharge, regardless of treatment method. Among patients with TA and AL, 36 (53.7%) received NPO, 25 (37.7%) underwent EVT, and 6 (9%) required surgery. Of these, 34 patients who were managed with NPO and 19 with EVT could resume an oral diet. However, only 2 patients who underwent surgery resumed an oral diet, and 2 patients required additional EVT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although patients with CA displayed a higher incidence of AL, their rate of successful oral intake exceeded that of those with TA, regardless of treatment method. Among patients exhibiting AL with TA, EVT was more commonly employed than in CA cases, and it appears effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":34499,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chest Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10927423/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chest Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5090/jcs.23.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anastomotic leakage (AL) following esophagectomy represents a serious complication that often results in prolonged hospitalization and necessitates repeated interventions, including nothing-by-mouth (NPO) restriction, endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT), or surgical repair. In this study, we evaluated the patterns and outcomes of AL treatment.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer at a single center between 2003 and 2020. Of 3,096 examined cases, 181 patients (5.8%) with AL were included in the study: 114 patients (63%) with cervical anastomosis (CA) and 67 (37%) with intrathoracic anastomosis (TA).

Results: The incidence of AL was 11.9% in the CA and 3.2% in the TA group (p<0.001). Among patients with CA who developed AL, 87 (76.3%) were managed with NPO, 15 (13.2%) with EVT, and 12 (10.5%) with surgical repair. Over 90% of patients with cervical AL resumed an oral diet by the time of discharge, regardless of treatment method. Among patients with TA and AL, 36 (53.7%) received NPO, 25 (37.7%) underwent EVT, and 6 (9%) required surgery. Of these, 34 patients who were managed with NPO and 19 with EVT could resume an oral diet. However, only 2 patients who underwent surgery resumed an oral diet, and 2 patients required additional EVT.

Conclusion: Although patients with CA displayed a higher incidence of AL, their rate of successful oral intake exceeded that of those with TA, regardless of treatment method. Among patients exhibiting AL with TA, EVT was more commonly employed than in CA cases, and it appears effective.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
食管癌食管切除术后吻合口漏的治疗模式和结果
背景:食管切除术后的吻合口漏(AL)是一种严重的并发症,通常会导致患者住院时间延长,并需要反复进行干预,包括禁食(NPO)、内镜真空治疗(EVT)或手术修复。在这项研究中,我们评估了 AL 治疗的模式和结果:我们回顾性审查了 2003 年至 2020 年间在一个中心接受食管癌食管切除术的患者的病历。在3096例受检病例中,181例(5.8%)AL患者被纳入研究:114名患者(63%)进行了颈部吻合术(CA),67名患者(37%)进行了胸内吻合术(TA):结果:CA组AL发生率为11.9%,TA组为3.2%(P结论:虽然CA组患者的AL发生率较高,但TA组患者的AL发生率较低:虽然CA患者的AL发生率较高,但无论采用哪种治疗方法,他们的口服成功率都高于TA患者。在伴有AL的TA患者中,EVT比CA患者更常用,而且似乎很有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chest Surgery
Journal of Chest Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Costs Associated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Korea. Diaphragmatic Fibromatosis: A Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenge: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Histological Findings of ETosis in Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome with Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Follow-Up Case Report. Recommendation for Clinical T Staging in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Volumetric Measurement: A Retrospective Study from Turkey. Prediction Model of Delayed Hemothorax in Patients with Traumatic Occult Hemothorax Using a Novel Nomogram.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1