Double positivity for rheumatoid factor and anti-CCP autoantibodies: improving referral from primary care of patients suspected of having rheumatoid arthritis.

Maria Salinas, Álvaro Blasco, Emilio Flores, Mauricio Minguez, Carlos Leiva-Salinas
{"title":"Double positivity for rheumatoid factor and anti-CCP autoantibodies: improving referral from primary care of patients suspected of having rheumatoid arthritis.","authors":"Maria Salinas, Álvaro Blasco, Emilio Flores, Mauricio Minguez, Carlos Leiva-Salinas","doi":"10.1017/S1463423623000695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic progressive autoimmune inflammatory disease with significant morbidity and mortality. The course of the disease can be modified if diagnosis is early and treatment appropriate.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>In this study, we aimed to evaluate a new strategy for early identification of RA patients in primary care settings (the 'diagnostic bottleneck') based on serological biomarkers and to manage inappropriate rheumatoid factor (RF) laboratory test requests.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A two-arm study was carried out. The first arm corresponded to a retrospective observational descriptive study of patients referred for RF testing from primary care using the current laboratory workflow. The second arm included the following prospective interventions: cancelation of RF requests corresponding to patients with previous negative results for RF over a one-year period; and automatic reflex testing antibodies against cyclic citrullinated proteins (anti-CCP) for patients displaying RF values >30 IU/ml. Outcomes from both arms were then compared.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>As double positivity for RF and anti-CCP notably increases the positive likelihood ratio of RA. The intervention enabled a reduction of 2813 tests in 22 months. Moreover, the frequency of unnecessary referrals was reduced from 22% to 8.2%, while that of missed patients decreased slightly (from 21% to 16%), with the number of patients diagnosed per RF request remaining unchanged. In terms of costs, we saved 19.4 RF tests per anti-CCP test added.We developed a simple and cost-effective strategy for reducing the time to diagnosis of RA that can improve patients' quality of life. This approach was supported by primary and specialised care.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"25 ","pages":"e6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10894719/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423623000695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic progressive autoimmune inflammatory disease with significant morbidity and mortality. The course of the disease can be modified if diagnosis is early and treatment appropriate.

Aim: In this study, we aimed to evaluate a new strategy for early identification of RA patients in primary care settings (the 'diagnostic bottleneck') based on serological biomarkers and to manage inappropriate rheumatoid factor (RF) laboratory test requests.

Method: A two-arm study was carried out. The first arm corresponded to a retrospective observational descriptive study of patients referred for RF testing from primary care using the current laboratory workflow. The second arm included the following prospective interventions: cancelation of RF requests corresponding to patients with previous negative results for RF over a one-year period; and automatic reflex testing antibodies against cyclic citrullinated proteins (anti-CCP) for patients displaying RF values >30 IU/ml. Outcomes from both arms were then compared.

Findings: As double positivity for RF and anti-CCP notably increases the positive likelihood ratio of RA. The intervention enabled a reduction of 2813 tests in 22 months. Moreover, the frequency of unnecessary referrals was reduced from 22% to 8.2%, while that of missed patients decreased slightly (from 21% to 16%), with the number of patients diagnosed per RF request remaining unchanged. In terms of costs, we saved 19.4 RF tests per anti-CCP test added.We developed a simple and cost-effective strategy for reducing the time to diagnosis of RA that can improve patients' quality of life. This approach was supported by primary and specialised care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
类风湿因子和抗CCP自身抗体双阳性:改善基层医疗机构对疑似类风湿性关节炎患者的转诊。
背景:类风湿性关节炎(RA)是一种慢性进行性自身免疫性炎症疾病,发病率和死亡率都很高。目的:在这项研究中,我们旨在评估一种基于血清学生物标志物的新策略,以便在初级医疗机构("诊断瓶颈")中早期识别 RA 患者,并管理不适当的类风湿因子(RF)实验室检测请求:方法:开展了一项双臂研究。方法:该研究分为两部分,第一部分是对基层医疗机构转诊的类风湿因子检测患者进行回顾性观察和描述性研究,采用的是当前的实验室工作流程。第二组包括以下前瞻性干预措施:取消一年内射频检测结果为阴性的患者的射频检测申请;对射频检测值大于 30 IU/ml 的患者自动反射检测环瓜氨酸蛋白抗体(抗CCP)。然后对两组结果进行比较:研究结果:RF 和抗-CCP 双阳性明显增加了 RA 的阳性可能性比。干预措施在 22 个月内减少了 2813 次检测。此外,不必要的转诊率从 22% 降至 8.2%,而漏诊率则略有下降(从 21% 降至 16%),但每次射频请求确诊的患者人数保持不变。在成本方面,每增加一次抗CCP检测,我们就能节省19.4次RF检测。我们开发了一种简单、经济有效的策略,缩短了RA的诊断时间,改善了患者的生活质量。这种方法得到了初级和专业护理的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Healthy ageing in long-term care? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic: a position paper. Early structured communication between general practitioner, sick-listed patient, and employer: Results and lessons learned from a pragmatic trial in the Capacity Note project. The impact of COVID-19 on referrals among general practitioners and specialists in Shanghai, China. The unrevealed links: periodontal health, human milk composition, and infant gut microbiome dynamics. Primary healthcare as a strategy for eliminating hepatitis C: the METRIC toolkit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1