Mentoring in Academic Nursing From the Perspectives of Faculty Mentors.

Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-16 DOI:10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001220
Katie Ruth Busby, Claire Burke Draucker
{"title":"Mentoring in Academic Nursing From the Perspectives of Faculty Mentors.","authors":"Katie Ruth Busby, Claire Burke Draucker","doi":"10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to create a theoretical framework that describes how mentoring relationships in academic nursing unfold from the perspectives of nurse faculty mentors.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Mentoring is a strategy that can promote the satisfaction and retention of nurse faculty. Although research has focused on the experiences of protégés in mentoring relationships, little is known about mentoring from the perspectives of nurse faculty mentors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Constructivist grounded theory was used to interview 24 experienced nurse faculty about their mentoring experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The theoretical framework Growing Together: Mentors' Perspectives on Mentoring included four phases (getting together, getting going, going together, going beyond) and three strands (relationship with protégé, work of mentoring, emotional impact of mentoring).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants experienced a variety of benefits from mentoring while also experiencing a variety of challenges. Findings suggest that more resources are needed for experienced faculty who mentor novice nurse faculty.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to create a theoretical framework that describes how mentoring relationships in academic nursing unfold from the perspectives of nurse faculty mentors.

Background: Mentoring is a strategy that can promote the satisfaction and retention of nurse faculty. Although research has focused on the experiences of protégés in mentoring relationships, little is known about mentoring from the perspectives of nurse faculty mentors.

Method: Constructivist grounded theory was used to interview 24 experienced nurse faculty about their mentoring experiences.

Results: The theoretical framework Growing Together: Mentors' Perspectives on Mentoring included four phases (getting together, getting going, going together, going beyond) and three strands (relationship with protégé, work of mentoring, emotional impact of mentoring).

Conclusion: Participants experienced a variety of benefits from mentoring while also experiencing a variety of challenges. Findings suggest that more resources are needed for experienced faculty who mentor novice nurse faculty.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
从教师指导者的角度看学术护理中的指导。
目的:本研究旨在建立一个理论框架,从护士教员导师的角度描述学术护理中的指导关系是如何展开的:背景:指导是一种可以提高护理教师满意度和留任率的策略。背景:指导是一种可以提高护理教师满意度和留任率的策略。尽管研究主要集中在被指导者在指导关系中的经历,但从护理教师指导者的角度来看指导的情况却鲜为人知:方法:采用建构主义基础理论采访了 24 名经验丰富的护理教师,了解他们的指导经验:结果:理论框架为共同成长:结果:"共同成长:导师对指导的看法 "的理论框架包括四个阶段(相聚、开始、共同前进、超越)和三个方面(与被指导者的关系、指导工作、指导的情感影响):结论:参与者从指导中获得了各种益处,同时也经历了各种挑战。研究结果表明,需要为指导护士新手的资深教师提供更多资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1