Does Old Age Comprise Distinct Subphases? Evidence from an Analysis of the Relationship between Age and Activities of Daily Living, Comorbidities, and Geriatric Syndromes.

IF 2.8 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-17 DOI:10.4235/agmr.23.0177
Ioannis Vrettos, Fotios Anagnostopoulos, Panagiota Voukelatou, Andreas Kyvetos, Despoina Theotoka, Dimitris Niakas
{"title":"Does Old Age Comprise Distinct Subphases? Evidence from an Analysis of the Relationship between Age and Activities of Daily Living, Comorbidities, and Geriatric Syndromes.","authors":"Ioannis Vrettos, Fotios Anagnostopoulos, Panagiota Voukelatou, Andreas Kyvetos, Despoina Theotoka, Dimitris Niakas","doi":"10.4235/agmr.23.0177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older individuals are usually treated as a homogenous group despite evidence that old age consists of distinct subphases. This observational study including 493 older patients aimed to identify differences among age subgroups of older persons. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was then applied to identify the optimal age cutoff points to distinguish those age groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected on the demographics of older patients, their medical and medication histories, dependence on activities of daily living (ADLs), and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs). Non-parametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests) and ROC curves were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 65-79 and ≥80 years of age groups showed distinct frailty status, comorbidity, and dependency in ADLs. The median age to remain completely independent in IADLs was 76-79 years, while the median age for being free from geriatric syndromes was slightly higher (77-80 years) and reached 82 years for the absence of delirium, falls, and swallowing problems. In the ROC analysis, the optimal cutoff ages for the presence of frailty, cognitive impairment, and dependency in ADLs were 80-82 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 65-79 and ≥80 years of age groups differed significantly in numerous parameters, underscoring the need to address these distinct age groups differently, both for applying medical therapies and interventions, as well as for conducting health research.</p>","PeriodicalId":44729,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research","volume":" ","pages":"65-75"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10982449/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.23.0177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Older individuals are usually treated as a homogenous group despite evidence that old age consists of distinct subphases. This observational study including 493 older patients aimed to identify differences among age subgroups of older persons. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was then applied to identify the optimal age cutoff points to distinguish those age groups.

Methods: Data were collected on the demographics of older patients, their medical and medication histories, dependence on activities of daily living (ADLs), and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs). Non-parametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests) and ROC curves were used for statistical analysis.

Results: The 65-79 and ≥80 years of age groups showed distinct frailty status, comorbidity, and dependency in ADLs. The median age to remain completely independent in IADLs was 76-79 years, while the median age for being free from geriatric syndromes was slightly higher (77-80 years) and reached 82 years for the absence of delirium, falls, and swallowing problems. In the ROC analysis, the optimal cutoff ages for the presence of frailty, cognitive impairment, and dependency in ADLs were 80-82 years.

Conclusion: The 65-79 and ≥80 years of age groups differed significantly in numerous parameters, underscoring the need to address these distinct age groups differently, both for applying medical therapies and interventions, as well as for conducting health research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年是否包含不同的亚阶段?年龄与日常生活活动、合并症和老年综合症之间关系的分析证据。
背景:尽管有证据表明老年期由不同的亚阶段组成,但老年人通常被视为一个同质群体。这项观察性研究包括 493 名老年患者,旨在确定老年人年龄亚群之间的差异。然后应用接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析,确定区分这些年龄组的最佳年龄分界点:收集的数据包括老年患者的人口统计学特征、病史和用药史、日常生活活动(ADLs)依赖性和日常生活工具性活动(IADLs)依赖性。统计分析采用了非参数检验(Kruskal-Wallis 和 Mann-Whitney U 检验)和 ROC 曲线:结果:65-79 岁年龄组和 80 岁以上年龄组显示出不同的虚弱状态、并发症和 ADLs 依赖性。在日常生活自理能力方面保持完全独立的中位年龄为 76-79 岁,而无老年综合症的中位年龄略高(77-80 岁),无谵妄、跌倒和吞咽困难的中位年龄达到 82 岁。在ROC分析中,出现虚弱、认知障碍和ADL依赖的最佳截止年龄为80-82岁:结论:65-79 岁年龄组和 80 岁以上年龄组在许多参数上存在显著差异,这表明在应用医疗疗法和干预措施以及开展健康研究时,有必要对这些不同的年龄组采取不同的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impairment in activities of daily living and related factors in elderly patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis before hospitalization. Circulating BMP-7 Level is Independent of Sarcopenia in Older Asian Adults. Relationship between Muscle Mass and Muscle Strength with Bone Density in Older Adults: A Systematic Review. Perioperative Risk Factors for Postoperative Delirium in Non-Dementia Older Patients after Non-Cardiac Surgery and Anesthesia: A Prospective Study. Preoperative Geriatric Characteristics Associated with Changes in Postoperative Cognitive Function and Quality of Life: a Prospective, Observational Analytic Multicenter Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1