X. Busquet-Duran , B.M. Carralero , J. Bielsa-Pascual , L. Milian-Adriazola , N. Salamero-Tura , P. Torán-Monserrat
{"title":"Fortalezas sistémicas y necesidades en atención paliativa domiciliaria: explorando la complejidad","authors":"X. Busquet-Duran , B.M. Carralero , J. Bielsa-Pascual , L. Milian-Adriazola , N. Salamero-Tura , P. Torán-Monserrat","doi":"10.1016/j.rce.2023.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We aimed to investigate the relationship between systemic strengths and complexity in home care of end-of-life patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Quantitative descriptive longitudinal study of patients cared for at home by a palliative care team. Place of death was analyzed in relation to complexity, as determined by the HexCom complexity model after the initial home assessment. We used Pearson's chi-square test to analyze the comparison of proportions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty-six hundred patients (74.4% oncologic) with a mean age of 76.2<!--> <!-->years (SD 13.2) participated. Fifty-three percent had complete or severe functional dependence, 30.8% were already bedridden in the first assessment, and 59.7% died at home. Strengths influenced place of death, specifically exosystem (team) strength (OR: 4.07 [1.92-8.63]), microsystem (both patient 0.51 [0.28-0.94]) and caregiver (OR: 3.90 [1.48-10.25]), and chronosystem, related to prediction of progressive course (OR: 2.22 [1.37-3.60]).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>To improve care for end-of-life patients and their families, a systemic view of dying and death that includes both needs and strengths is necessary. In this sense, the systemic framework proposed by Bonfrenbrenner can be useful for clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21223,"journal":{"name":"Revista clinica espanola","volume":"224 1","pages":"Pages 1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014256523001959/pdfft?md5=ec8c686cddaf62c5da8ac2867a5bd72a&pid=1-s2.0-S0014256523001959-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista clinica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014256523001959","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
We aimed to investigate the relationship between systemic strengths and complexity in home care of end-of-life patients.
Methods
Quantitative descriptive longitudinal study of patients cared for at home by a palliative care team. Place of death was analyzed in relation to complexity, as determined by the HexCom complexity model after the initial home assessment. We used Pearson's chi-square test to analyze the comparison of proportions.
Results
Forty-six hundred patients (74.4% oncologic) with a mean age of 76.2 years (SD 13.2) participated. Fifty-three percent had complete or severe functional dependence, 30.8% were already bedridden in the first assessment, and 59.7% died at home. Strengths influenced place of death, specifically exosystem (team) strength (OR: 4.07 [1.92-8.63]), microsystem (both patient 0.51 [0.28-0.94]) and caregiver (OR: 3.90 [1.48-10.25]), and chronosystem, related to prediction of progressive course (OR: 2.22 [1.37-3.60]).
Conclusions
To improve care for end-of-life patients and their families, a systemic view of dying and death that includes both needs and strengths is necessary. In this sense, the systemic framework proposed by Bonfrenbrenner can be useful for clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Revista Clínica Española published its first issue in 1940 and is the body of expression of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI).
The journal fully endorses the goals of updating knowledge and facilitating the acquisition of key developments in internal medicine applied to clinical practice. Revista Clínica Española is subject to a thorough double blind review of the received articles written in Spanish or English. Nine issues are published each year, including mostly originals, reviews and consensus documents.