Estimating demand for potential disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer's disease in the UK.

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY British Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1192/bjp.2023.166
Axel A S Laurell, Ashwin V Venkataraman, Tatjana Schmidt, Marcella Montagnese, Christoph Mueller, Robert Stewart, Jonathan Lewis, Clare Mundell, Jeremy D Isaacs, Mani S Krishnan, Robert Barber, Timothy Rittman, Benjamin R Underwood
{"title":"Estimating demand for potential disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer's disease in the UK.","authors":"Axel A S Laurell, Ashwin V Venkataraman, Tatjana Schmidt, Marcella Montagnese, Christoph Mueller, Robert Stewart, Jonathan Lewis, Clare Mundell, Jeremy D Isaacs, Mani S Krishnan, Robert Barber, Timothy Rittman, Benjamin R Underwood","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2023.166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Phase three trials of the monoclonal antibodies lecanemab and donanemab, which target brain amyloid, have reported statistically significant differences in clinical end-points in early Alzheimer's disease. These drugs are already in use in some countries and are going through the regulatory approval process for use in the UK. Concerns have been raised about the ability of healthcare systems, including those in the UK, to deliver these treatments, considering the resources required for their administration and monitoring.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To estimate the scale of real-world demand for monoclonal antibodies for Alzheimer's disease in the UK.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used anonymised patient record databases from two National Health Service trusts for the year 2019 to collect clinical, demographic, cognitive and neuroimaging data for these cohorts. Eligibility for treatment was assessed using the inclusion criteria from the clinical trials of donanemab and lecanemab, with consideration given to diagnosis, cognitive performance, cerebrovascular disease and willingness to receive treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We examined the records of 82 386 people referred to services covering around 2.2 million people. After applying the trial criteria, we estimate that a maximum of 906 people per year would start treatment with monoclonal antibodies in the two services, equating to 30 200 people if extrapolated nationally.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Monoclonal antibody treatments for Alzheimer's disease are likely to present a significant challenge for healthcare services to deliver in terms of the neuroimaging and treatment delivery. The data provided here allows health services to understand the potential demand and plan accordingly.</p>","PeriodicalId":9259,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2023.166","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Phase three trials of the monoclonal antibodies lecanemab and donanemab, which target brain amyloid, have reported statistically significant differences in clinical end-points in early Alzheimer's disease. These drugs are already in use in some countries and are going through the regulatory approval process for use in the UK. Concerns have been raised about the ability of healthcare systems, including those in the UK, to deliver these treatments, considering the resources required for their administration and monitoring.

Aims: To estimate the scale of real-world demand for monoclonal antibodies for Alzheimer's disease in the UK.

Method: We used anonymised patient record databases from two National Health Service trusts for the year 2019 to collect clinical, demographic, cognitive and neuroimaging data for these cohorts. Eligibility for treatment was assessed using the inclusion criteria from the clinical trials of donanemab and lecanemab, with consideration given to diagnosis, cognitive performance, cerebrovascular disease and willingness to receive treatment.

Results: We examined the records of 82 386 people referred to services covering around 2.2 million people. After applying the trial criteria, we estimate that a maximum of 906 people per year would start treatment with monoclonal antibodies in the two services, equating to 30 200 people if extrapolated nationally.

Conclusions: Monoclonal antibody treatments for Alzheimer's disease are likely to present a significant challenge for healthcare services to deliver in terms of the neuroimaging and treatment delivery. The data provided here allows health services to understand the potential demand and plan accordingly.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
估算英国对阿尔茨海默病潜在疾病改变疗法的需求。
背景:针对脑淀粉样蛋白的单克隆抗体莱卡奈单抗(lecanemab)和多那奈单抗(donanemab)的三期试验报告显示,这两种单克隆抗体在早期阿尔茨海默病的临床终点方面存在统计学意义上的显著差异。这些药物已在一些国家使用,并正在通过在英国使用的监管审批程序。考虑到管理和监测所需的资源,人们对包括英国在内的医疗系统提供这些治疗的能力表示担忧:我们使用两家国民健康服务托管机构 2019 年的匿名患者记录数据库,收集这些队列的临床、人口统计学、认知和神经影像学数据。治疗资格根据多那单抗和来卡尼单抗临床试验的纳入标准进行评估,并考虑了诊断、认知表现、脑血管疾病和接受治疗的意愿:我们检查了 82 386 名转诊患者的病历,覆盖人群约 220 万。在应用试验标准后,我们估计每年最多有 906 人将在这两家服务机构开始接受单克隆抗体治疗,如果推算到全国,则相当于 30 200 人:单克隆抗体治疗阿尔茨海默病可能会在神经影像学和治疗提供方面给医疗服务带来巨大挑战。本文提供的数据可帮助医疗服务机构了解潜在需求并制定相应计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Psychiatry
British Journal of Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
1.90%
发文量
184
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Psychiatry (BJPsych) is a renowned international journal that undergoes rigorous peer review. It covers various branches of psychiatry, with a specific focus on the clinical aspects of each topic. Published monthly by the Royal College of Psychiatrists, this journal is dedicated to enhancing the prevention, investigation, diagnosis, treatment, and care of mental illness worldwide. It also strives to promote global mental health. In addition to featuring authoritative original research articles from across the globe, the journal includes editorials, review articles, commentaries on contentious issues, a comprehensive book review section, and a dynamic correspondence column. BJPsych is an essential source of information for psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, and other professionals interested in mental health.
期刊最新文献
Detection of suicidality from medical text using privacy-preserving large language models. Breast cancer risk among women with schizophrenia and association with duration of antipsychotic use: population-based cohort study in South Korea. Equal, equitable or exacerbating inequalities: patterns and predictors of social prescribing referrals in 160 128 UK patients. Apotychiaphobia: should there be a term for fear of miscarriage? Association between dietary fat intake and the risk of Alzheimer's disease: Mendelian randomisation study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1