Dose Prescription to Isodose Lines in Static Multi-Beam Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Tumors: Which Line Is Optimal?

Q4 Medicine Kurume Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-14 Epub Date: 2024-01-16 DOI:10.2739/kurumemedj.MS6934016
Maho Iwana-Yamada, Yuta Shibamoto, Fumiya Baba, Hiromitsu Iwata, Satoshi Ishikura, Junpei Nagayoshi, Akio Hiwatashi, Hiroyuki Ogino
{"title":"Dose Prescription to Isodose Lines in Static Multi-Beam Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Tumors: Which Line Is Optimal?","authors":"Maho Iwana-Yamada, Yuta Shibamoto, Fumiya Baba, Hiromitsu Iwata, Satoshi Ishikura, Junpei Nagayoshi, Akio Hiwatashi, Hiroyuki Ogino","doi":"10.2739/kurumemedj.MS6934016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the appropriate dose prescription method in static multi-beam stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung tumors. Static multi-beam stereotactic body radiotherapy is a mainstream treatment in Japan. Based on the hypothesis that dose prescription to lower isodose lines may improve planning target volume dose coverage and decrease doses to organs at risk, we investigated changes in dose-volume histograms with prescription to various isodose lines for planning target volume in static multi-beam stereotactic body radiotherapy. In all treatment plans, 45 Gy in 4 fractions were prescribed to 95% of the planning target volume. By adjusting the leaf margins of each beam, various prescription isodose lines encompassing 95% volume of the planning target volume were generated. The prescription isodose lines investigated were 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 and 90% lines relative to the maximum dose of each planning target volume. The conformity index, homogeneity index, mean lung dose, and V5-V40 of the lung were evaluated. The dose was calculated by the adaptive convolve algorithm. The conformity index was lowest in the 70% or 80% isodose plan. The mean lung doses and V10-V40 of the lung decreased steeply from the 90% to the 70% isodose plan, and was lowest in the 60% and 70% isodose plans. These indices increased in the 40% and 50% isodose plans. The optimal stereotactic body radiotherapy plans appeared to be dose prescription to the 60% or 70% isodose line. Further investigation is warranted to clarify the advantage of using this method clinically.</p>","PeriodicalId":39559,"journal":{"name":"Kurume Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":"217-226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kurume Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2739/kurumemedj.MS6934016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the appropriate dose prescription method in static multi-beam stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung tumors. Static multi-beam stereotactic body radiotherapy is a mainstream treatment in Japan. Based on the hypothesis that dose prescription to lower isodose lines may improve planning target volume dose coverage and decrease doses to organs at risk, we investigated changes in dose-volume histograms with prescription to various isodose lines for planning target volume in static multi-beam stereotactic body radiotherapy. In all treatment plans, 45 Gy in 4 fractions were prescribed to 95% of the planning target volume. By adjusting the leaf margins of each beam, various prescription isodose lines encompassing 95% volume of the planning target volume were generated. The prescription isodose lines investigated were 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 and 90% lines relative to the maximum dose of each planning target volume. The conformity index, homogeneity index, mean lung dose, and V5-V40 of the lung were evaluated. The dose was calculated by the adaptive convolve algorithm. The conformity index was lowest in the 70% or 80% isodose plan. The mean lung doses and V10-V40 of the lung decreased steeply from the 90% to the 70% isodose plan, and was lowest in the 60% and 70% isodose plans. These indices increased in the 40% and 50% isodose plans. The optimal stereotactic body radiotherapy plans appeared to be dose prescription to the 60% or 70% isodose line. Further investigation is warranted to clarify the advantage of using this method clinically.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静态多波束立体定向体外放射治疗肺部肿瘤的等剂量线剂量处方:哪条线最佳?
本研究探讨了静态多光束立体定向体放射治疗肺部肿瘤的适当剂量处方方法。静态多波束立体定向体放射治疗是日本的主流治疗方法。根据剂量处方到较低的等剂量线可以提高计划靶体积剂量覆盖率并减少危险器官剂量的假设,我们研究了静态多波束立体定向体放射治疗计划靶体积剂量处方到不同等剂量线时剂量-体积直方图的变化。在所有治疗计划中,计划靶体积的 95% 都是 45 Gy,分 4 次照射。通过调整每个射束的叶缘,产生了各种等剂量线处方,涵盖了计划目标体积的 95%。相对于每个规划目标体积的最大剂量,所研究的处方等剂量线分别为 40、50、60、70、80 和 90%。对肺部的一致性指数、均匀性指数、平均肺部剂量和 V5-V40 进行了评估。剂量通过自适应卷积算法计算。在 70% 或 80% 等剂量计划中,一致性指数最低。平均肺剂量和肺部 V10-V40 从 90% 等剂量计划到 70% 等剂量计划急剧下降,在 60% 和 70% 等剂量计划中最低。这些指数在40%和50%等剂量方案中有所增加。最佳的立体定向体放射治疗计划似乎是剂量处方到60%或70%等剂量线。为了明确在临床上使用这种方法的优势,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kurume Medical Journal
Kurume Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
A Case of Sarcoid Reaction in Subcarinal Lymph Node in A Postoperative Breast Cancer Diagnosed by Thoracoscopic Biopsy. Comminuted Transverse Femoral Shaft Fractures Are at Risk for Nonunion. High Expression of NDRG1 is a Poor Prognostic Factor in Patients with Endometrial Endometrioid Carcinoma with Long-Term Observation. Histological Improvement of Hepatic Fibrosis of Decompensated Liver Cirrhosis after Prednisolone and Azathioprine Treatment in a Patient with Autoimmune Hepatitis. Surgical Treatment of Simultaneous Common Femoral and Profunda Femoris Artery Aneurysms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1