Perception of near-threshold visual stimuli is influenced by prestimulus alpha-band amplitude but not by alpha phase.

Psychophysiology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-17 DOI:10.1111/psyp.14525
María Melcón, Enrique Stern, Dominique Kessel, Lydia Arana, Claudia Poch, Pablo Campo, Almudena Capilla
{"title":"Perception of near-threshold visual stimuli is influenced by prestimulus alpha-band amplitude but not by alpha phase.","authors":"María Melcón, Enrique Stern, Dominique Kessel, Lydia Arana, Claudia Poch, Pablo Campo, Almudena Capilla","doi":"10.1111/psyp.14525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ongoing brain activity preceding visual stimulation has been suggested to shape conscious perception. According to the pulsed inhibition framework, bouts of functional inhibition arise in each alpha cycle (every ~100 ms), allowing information to be processed in a pulsatile manner. Consequently, it has been hypothesized that perceptual outcome can be influenced by the specific phase of alpha oscillations prior to the stimulus onset, although empirical findings are controversial. In this study, we aimed to shed light on the role of prestimulus alpha oscillations in visual perception. To this end, we recorded electroencephalographic activity, while participants performed three near-threshold visual detection tasks with different attentional involvement: a no-cue task, a noninformative cue task (50% validity), and an informative cue task (100% validity). Cluster-based permutation statistics were complemented with Bayesian analyses to test the effect of prestimulus oscillatory amplitude and phase on visual awareness. We additionally examined whether these effects differed in trials with low and high oscillatory amplitude, as expected from the pulsed inhibition theory. Our results show a clear effect of prestimulus alpha amplitude on conscious perception, but only when alpha fluctuated spontaneously. In contrast, we did not find any evidence that prestimulus alpha phase influenced perceptual outcome, not even when differentiating between low- and high-amplitude trials. Furthermore, Bayesian analysis provided moderate evidence in favor of the absence of phase effects. Taken together, our results challenge the central theoretical predictions of the pulsed inhibition framework, at least for the particular experimental conditions used here.</p>","PeriodicalId":94182,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ongoing brain activity preceding visual stimulation has been suggested to shape conscious perception. According to the pulsed inhibition framework, bouts of functional inhibition arise in each alpha cycle (every ~100 ms), allowing information to be processed in a pulsatile manner. Consequently, it has been hypothesized that perceptual outcome can be influenced by the specific phase of alpha oscillations prior to the stimulus onset, although empirical findings are controversial. In this study, we aimed to shed light on the role of prestimulus alpha oscillations in visual perception. To this end, we recorded electroencephalographic activity, while participants performed three near-threshold visual detection tasks with different attentional involvement: a no-cue task, a noninformative cue task (50% validity), and an informative cue task (100% validity). Cluster-based permutation statistics were complemented with Bayesian analyses to test the effect of prestimulus oscillatory amplitude and phase on visual awareness. We additionally examined whether these effects differed in trials with low and high oscillatory amplitude, as expected from the pulsed inhibition theory. Our results show a clear effect of prestimulus alpha amplitude on conscious perception, but only when alpha fluctuated spontaneously. In contrast, we did not find any evidence that prestimulus alpha phase influenced perceptual outcome, not even when differentiating between low- and high-amplitude trials. Furthermore, Bayesian analysis provided moderate evidence in favor of the absence of phase effects. Taken together, our results challenge the central theoretical predictions of the pulsed inhibition framework, at least for the particular experimental conditions used here.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对近阈值视觉刺激的感知受刺激前阿尔法波段振幅的影响,但不受阿尔法相位的影响。
有人认为,在视觉刺激之前持续进行的大脑活动会形成有意识的感知。根据脉冲抑制框架,在每个α周期(每隔约 100 毫秒)中都会出现功能抑制,从而以脉冲方式处理信息。因此,有人假设知觉结果会受到刺激开始之前α振荡的特定相位的影响,尽管实证研究结果还存在争议。在本研究中,我们旨在揭示刺激前阿尔法振荡在视觉感知中的作用。为此,我们记录了脑电活动,同时参与者执行了三项有不同注意参与的近阈值视觉检测任务:无提示任务、非信息提示任务(50% 有效)和信息提示任务(100% 有效)。基于聚类的置换统计与贝叶斯分析相结合,检验了预刺激振荡振幅和相位对视觉意识的影响。此外,我们还检验了这些影响在低振荡振幅和高振荡振幅的试验中是否存在差异,正如脉冲抑制理论所预期的那样。我们的结果表明,预刺激α振幅对意识知觉有明显影响,但仅限于α自发波动时。相反,我们没有发现任何证据表明预刺激α相位会影响知觉结果,即使在区分低振幅和高振幅试验时也是如此。此外,贝叶斯分析也提供了适度的证据,证明不存在相位效应。综上所述,我们的研究结果对脉冲抑制框架的核心理论预测提出了挑战,至少在这里使用的特定实验条件下是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How effort-based self-interest motivation shapes altruistic donation behavior and brain responses. Beyond peaks and troughs: Multiplexed performance monitoring signals in the EEG. Reduced reward responsiveness and depression vulnerability: Consideration of social contexts and implications for intervention. Moving toward reality: Electrocortical reactivity to naturalistic multimodal emotional videos. Mapping the routes of perception: Hemispheric asymmetries in signal propagation dynamics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1