Assessment of the sacroiliac joint with computed tomography motion analysis: a diagnostic study of 12 patients.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Acta Orthopaedica Pub Date : 2024-01-18 DOI:10.2340/17453674.2024.35227
Grim Olivecrona, Lena Gordon Murkes, Henrik Olivecrona, Paul Gerdhem
{"title":"Assessment of the sacroiliac joint with computed tomography motion analysis: a diagnostic study of 12 patients.","authors":"Grim Olivecrona, Lena Gordon Murkes, Henrik Olivecrona, Paul Gerdhem","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2024.35227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Pain in the sacroiliac joint may be caused by abnormal joint motion. Diagnosis is mainly based on clinical tests. The aims of this study were to examine whether low-dose computed tomography with provocation of the hip could detect sacroiliac joint motion, and to study whether provocation of the hip results in greater sacroiliac joint motion in the ipsilateral than in the contralateral sacroiliac joint.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>12 patients with sacroiliac joint pain were examined with low-dose computed tomography scans of the sacroiliac joint, one with the hips in the neutral position, and one each in provocation with the left or the right hip in a figure-of-4 position. Accuracy was tested by comparing internal rotation of the sacrum with internal rotation in the sacroiliac joint. Motion in the sacroiliac joint was assessed by comparing the position of each of the ilia with the reference, the sacrum. Data is shown as mean with 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed greater motion in the sacroiliac joint than internally in the sacrum, i.e., 0.57° (CI 0.43-0.71) vs. 0.20° (CI 0.11-0.28). The motion of the geometric center of the moving object for the sacroiliac joint was larger on the provoked side; mean difference 0.17 mm (CI 0.01-0.33), P = 0.04. Corresponding figures for rotation were mean difference 0.19° (CI 0.10-0.28), P < 0.001. Compared with the sacrum, the largest motion was seen at the anterior superior iliac spine; mean difference 0.38 mm (CI 0.10-0.66), P = 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Provocation in the figure-of-4 position of the hip results in sacroiliac joint motion measurable with computed tomography motion analysis. Provocation of the hip induces larger motion on the ipsilateral than on the contralateral sacroiliac joint.</p>","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"95 ","pages":"20-24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10798261/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.35227","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Pain in the sacroiliac joint may be caused by abnormal joint motion. Diagnosis is mainly based on clinical tests. The aims of this study were to examine whether low-dose computed tomography with provocation of the hip could detect sacroiliac joint motion, and to study whether provocation of the hip results in greater sacroiliac joint motion in the ipsilateral than in the contralateral sacroiliac joint.

Patients and methods: 12 patients with sacroiliac joint pain were examined with low-dose computed tomography scans of the sacroiliac joint, one with the hips in the neutral position, and one each in provocation with the left or the right hip in a figure-of-4 position. Accuracy was tested by comparing internal rotation of the sacrum with internal rotation in the sacroiliac joint. Motion in the sacroiliac joint was assessed by comparing the position of each of the ilia with the reference, the sacrum. Data is shown as mean with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: We observed greater motion in the sacroiliac joint than internally in the sacrum, i.e., 0.57° (CI 0.43-0.71) vs. 0.20° (CI 0.11-0.28). The motion of the geometric center of the moving object for the sacroiliac joint was larger on the provoked side; mean difference 0.17 mm (CI 0.01-0.33), P = 0.04. Corresponding figures for rotation were mean difference 0.19° (CI 0.10-0.28), P < 0.001. Compared with the sacrum, the largest motion was seen at the anterior superior iliac spine; mean difference 0.38 mm (CI 0.10-0.66), P = 0.001.

Conclusion: Provocation in the figure-of-4 position of the hip results in sacroiliac joint motion measurable with computed tomography motion analysis. Provocation of the hip induces larger motion on the ipsilateral than on the contralateral sacroiliac joint.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过计算机断层扫描运动分析评估骶髂关节:对 12 名患者的诊断研究。
背景和目的:骶髂关节疼痛可能是由关节运动异常引起的。诊断主要基于临床测试。本研究旨在探讨低剂量计算机断层扫描与髋关节激惹是否能检测出骶髂关节运动,以及研究髋关节激惹是否会导致同侧骶髂关节运动大于对侧骶髂关节运动。患者和方法:12 位骶髂关节疼痛患者接受了骶髂关节低剂量计算机断层扫描检查,其中一位患者的髋关节处于中立位,另一位患者的左髋或右髋处于 "四 "字位。通过比较骶骨内旋和骶髂关节内旋来测试准确性。骶髂关节的运动是通过比较每个髂骨的位置和参照物(骶骨)来评估的。数据以平均值和 95% 置信区间 (CI) 表示:我们观察到骶髂关节的运动大于骶骨内部的运动,即 0.57° (CI 0.43-0.71) vs. 0.20° (CI 0.11-0.28)。骶髂关节运动物体几何中心的运动在受激惹一侧更大;平均差为 0.17 mm (CI 0.01-0.33),P = 0.04。旋转的相应数字为平均差 0.19° (CI 0.10-0.28),P < 0.001。与骶骨相比,髂前上棘的运动幅度最大;平均差值为 0.38 mm (CI 0.10-0.66),P = 0.001:在髋关节 "四 "字形位置进行刺激会导致骶髂关节运动,可通过计算机断层扫描运动分析进行测量。与对侧骶髂关节相比,同侧髋关节的刺激引起的运动更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Orthopaedica
Acta Orthopaedica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
105
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.
期刊最新文献
Clinical prediction models for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: an external validation based on a systematic review and the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Digital health literacy in Norwegian patients with hip and knee arthroplasty: normative data from a cross-sectional study. Safety notices and registry outlier data measure different aspects of safety and performance of total knee implants: a comparative study of safety notices and register outliers. Acute treatment of elderly patients with acetabular fractures by open reduction, internal fixation, and total hip arthroplasty: a 1-10-year follow-up of 48 patients. Incidence and risk factors of adverse events after distal radius fracture fixation with volar locking plates: retrospective analysis of 2,790 cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1