Asenapine versus olanzapine for the treatment of nausea and vomiting in patients with cancer: A retrospective study.

IF 2 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Neuropsychopharmacology Reports Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1002/npr2.12412
Tomohiko Kimura, Akifumi Kanai, Hiroyuki Muraoka, Yuichiro Takahashi, Masatomo Ara, Ken Inada
{"title":"Asenapine versus olanzapine for the treatment of nausea and vomiting in patients with cancer: A retrospective study.","authors":"Tomohiko Kimura, Akifumi Kanai, Hiroyuki Muraoka, Yuichiro Takahashi, Masatomo Ara, Ken Inada","doi":"10.1002/npr2.12412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Patients with cancer often experience nausea and vomiting (N/V), but may have difficulty using olanzapine (OLZ), a common antiemetic. Asenapine (ASE) is a multi-acting receptor-targeted antipsychotic like OLZ, although there is little evidence that ASE serves as an antiemetic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of ASE compared to those of OLZ for the treatment of N/V in patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study involved patients who received 5 mg ASE, 5 mg OLZ, or 2.5 mg OLZ for 2 days. Daily worst N/V was rated on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (very much). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who had a response, defined as any reduction in N/V score. A complete response (CR) was defined as a score reduction to 0. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients with CR and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between April 2017 and March 2023, 212 patients were enrolled to receive treatment: 5 mg ASE (n = 34), 5 mg OLZ (n = 102), or 2.5 mg OLZ (n = 76). No significant differences in response rates (52.9% vs. 58.8% vs. 52.6%, p = 0.671) or secondary endpoints were observed between the groups. Patients receiving ASE were more likely to experience oral hypoesthesia (p = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This preliminary study suggests that ASE may be effective for N/V. Further studies are required to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19137,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychopharmacology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10932765/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychopharmacology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/npr2.12412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Patients with cancer often experience nausea and vomiting (N/V), but may have difficulty using olanzapine (OLZ), a common antiemetic. Asenapine (ASE) is a multi-acting receptor-targeted antipsychotic like OLZ, although there is little evidence that ASE serves as an antiemetic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of ASE compared to those of OLZ for the treatment of N/V in patients with cancer.

Methods: This retrospective study involved patients who received 5 mg ASE, 5 mg OLZ, or 2.5 mg OLZ for 2 days. Daily worst N/V was rated on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (very much). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who had a response, defined as any reduction in N/V score. A complete response (CR) was defined as a score reduction to 0. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients with CR and adverse events.

Results: Between April 2017 and March 2023, 212 patients were enrolled to receive treatment: 5 mg ASE (n = 34), 5 mg OLZ (n = 102), or 2.5 mg OLZ (n = 76). No significant differences in response rates (52.9% vs. 58.8% vs. 52.6%, p = 0.671) or secondary endpoints were observed between the groups. Patients receiving ASE were more likely to experience oral hypoesthesia (p = 0.004).

Conclusion: This preliminary study suggests that ASE may be effective for N/V. Further studies are required to confirm these findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿塞那平与奥氮平治疗癌症患者的恶心和呕吐:一项回顾性研究。
目的:癌症患者经常会出现恶心和呕吐(N/V),但可能难以使用常用的止吐药奥氮平(OLZ)。阿塞那平(ASE)与奥氮平一样是一种多作用受体靶向抗精神病药,但几乎没有证据表明阿塞那平具有止吐作用。本研究旨在评估ASE与OLZ治疗癌症患者N/V的疗效和耐受性:这项回顾性研究涉及接受 5 毫克 ASE、5 毫克 OLZ 或 2.5 毫克 OLZ 治疗 2 天的患者。每天最严重的 N/V 评分从 0(无)到 3(非常严重)。主要终点是有应答的患者比例,即 N/V 评分下降。次要终点包括有应答的患者比例和不良事件:2017年4月至2023年3月期间,212名患者入组接受治疗:5 毫克 ASE(n = 34)、5 毫克 OLZ(n = 102)或 2.5 毫克 OLZ(n = 76)。各组间的应答率(52.9% vs. 58.8% vs. 52.6%,p = 0.671)或次要终点无明显差异。接受 ASE 治疗的患者更有可能出现口腔麻痹(p = 0.004):这项初步研究表明,ASE 可能对 N/V 有效。结论:这项初步研究表明,ASE 可能对 N/V 有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychopharmacology Reports
Neuropsychopharmacology Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Fluoxetine does not influence response to continuous theta burst stimulation in human motor cortex. The association between benzodiazepine prescriptions and the risk of laxative use in schizophrenia treatment. Effects of frequently prescribed antiseizure medications on motor vehicle driving performance: Narrative review based on a tiered approach for the assessment of clinically meaningful driving impairment in the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare guideline. Successful treatment with olanzapine and aripiprazole of a schizophrenic patient who developed priapism after switching from risperidone to paliperidone. Investigation of risk factors associated with the development of depressive symptoms in healthy subjects exposed to long-term stress: A prospective study of the Japanese Antarctic research expedition wintering party.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1