Trends in Use of Telemedicine for Stimulant Initiation Among Children and Adults.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Psychiatric services Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.20230421
Haiden A Huskamp, Lori Uscher-Pines, Pushpa Raja, Sharon-Lise T Normand, Ateev Mehrotra, Alisa B Busch
{"title":"Trends in Use of Telemedicine for Stimulant Initiation Among Children and Adults.","authors":"Haiden A Huskamp, Lori Uscher-Pines, Pushpa Raja, Sharon-Lise T Normand, Ateev Mehrotra, Alisa B Busch","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20230421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The authors sought to examine trends in stimulant initiation and follow-up care for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) via telemedicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective longitudinal study used national, deidentified commercial health insurance outpatient claims among children (ages 2-17 years; N=535,629) and adults (ages 18-64 years; N=2,116,160) from January 2019 through April 2022. Regression analyses were used to examine risk for stimulant initiation, whether initiation occurred via telemedicine or in-person care, and receipt of a follow-up visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean monthly adjusted number of stimulant initiations per 100,000 enrollees was similar for children before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (prepandemic, 57 initiations; during pandemic, 56 initiations) but increased for adults (prepandemic, 27 initiations; during pandemic, 33 initiations). Initiations via telemedicine peaked at 53%-57% in April 2020 and dropped to about 14% among children and 28% among adults in April 2022. Telemedicine initiations were significantly more common among psychiatrists than among other prescribers (OR=3.70, 95% CI=3.38-4.06 [children]; OR=3.02, 95% CI=2.87-3.17 [adults]) and less common for rural residents (OR=0.57, 95% CI=0.40-0.82 [children]; OR=0.75, 95% CI=0.61-0.92 [adults]). Follow-up care was significantly more common among individuals whose care was initiated via telemedicine than among those receiving in-person care (OR=1.09, 95% CI=1.00-1.19 [children]; OR=1.61, 95% CI=1.53-1.69 [adults]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many stimulant treatments were initiated via telemedicine. Proposed rules to prohibit controlled substance prescribing without an in-person evaluation would require significant changes in current practice, potentially limiting access to stimulant medications for ADHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":20878,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11216869/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric services","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20230421","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The authors sought to examine trends in stimulant initiation and follow-up care for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) via telemedicine.

Methods: This retrospective longitudinal study used national, deidentified commercial health insurance outpatient claims among children (ages 2-17 years; N=535,629) and adults (ages 18-64 years; N=2,116,160) from January 2019 through April 2022. Regression analyses were used to examine risk for stimulant initiation, whether initiation occurred via telemedicine or in-person care, and receipt of a follow-up visit.

Results: The mean monthly adjusted number of stimulant initiations per 100,000 enrollees was similar for children before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (prepandemic, 57 initiations; during pandemic, 56 initiations) but increased for adults (prepandemic, 27 initiations; during pandemic, 33 initiations). Initiations via telemedicine peaked at 53%-57% in April 2020 and dropped to about 14% among children and 28% among adults in April 2022. Telemedicine initiations were significantly more common among psychiatrists than among other prescribers (OR=3.70, 95% CI=3.38-4.06 [children]; OR=3.02, 95% CI=2.87-3.17 [adults]) and less common for rural residents (OR=0.57, 95% CI=0.40-0.82 [children]; OR=0.75, 95% CI=0.61-0.92 [adults]). Follow-up care was significantly more common among individuals whose care was initiated via telemedicine than among those receiving in-person care (OR=1.09, 95% CI=1.00-1.19 [children]; OR=1.61, 95% CI=1.53-1.69 [adults]).

Conclusions: Many stimulant treatments were initiated via telemedicine. Proposed rules to prohibit controlled substance prescribing without an in-person evaluation would require significant changes in current practice, potentially limiting access to stimulant medications for ADHD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童和成人使用远程医疗开始服用兴奋剂的趋势。
目的作者试图研究通过远程医疗对注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)进行兴奋剂治疗和后续治疗的趋势:这项回顾性纵向研究使用了从 2019 年 1 月到 2022 年 4 月的全国性去身份化商业健康保险门诊报销单,其中包括儿童(2-17 岁;N=535,629)和成人(18-64 岁;N=2,116,160)。我们使用回归分析来研究开始使用兴奋剂的风险、是否通过远程医疗或面对面护理开始使用兴奋剂以及接受随访的情况:结果:在 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间,每 100,000 名参保者中平均每月调整后的兴奋剂使用次数在儿童中相似(大流行前,57 次使用;大流行期间,56 次使用),但在成人中有所增加(大流行前,27 次使用;大流行期间,33 次使用)。2020 年 4 月,通过远程医疗启动的比例达到峰值,为 53%-57%,到 2022 年 4 月,儿童和成人中通过远程医疗启动的比例分别降至 14% 和 28%。精神科医生启动远程医疗的比例明显高于其他处方者(OR=3.70,95% CI=3.38-4.06[儿童];OR=3.02,95% CI=2.87-3.17[成人]),而农村居民启动远程医疗的比例较低(OR=0.57,95% CI=0.40-0.82[儿童];OR=0.75,95% CI=0.61-0.92[成人])。通过远程医疗开始治疗的患者接受后续治疗的比例明显高于亲自接受治疗的患者(OR=1.09,95% CI=1.00-1.19[儿童];OR=1.61,95% CI=1.53-1.69[成人]):许多兴奋剂治疗都是通过远程医疗开始的。禁止在未进行面对面评估的情况下开具受管制药物处方的拟议规则将要求对当前的做法进行重大改变,这可能会限制人们获得治疗多动症的兴奋剂药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatric services
Psychiatric services 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
295
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatric Services, established in 1950, is published monthly by the American Psychiatric Association. The peer-reviewed journal features research reports on issues related to the delivery of mental health services, especially for people with serious mental illness in community-based treatment programs. Long known as an interdisciplinary journal, Psychiatric Services recognizes that provision of high-quality care involves collaboration among a variety of professionals, frequently working as a team. Authors of research reports published in the journal include psychiatrists, psychologists, pharmacists, nurses, social workers, drug and alcohol treatment counselors, economists, policy analysts, and professionals in related systems such as criminal justice and welfare systems. In the mental health field, the current focus on patient-centered, recovery-oriented care and on dissemination of evidence-based practices is transforming service delivery systems at all levels. Research published in Psychiatric Services contributes to this transformation.
期刊最新文献
A Lived Experience Perspective in Suicide Prevention Research. State Policy Strategies for the Workforce Emergency in Behavioral Health. Employment Experiences and Employability of People in China Living With Schizophrenia: A Qualitative Study. Recovery Coach Program Implementation Across an Integrated Health System. Influenza and COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Among Individuals With Versus Without Diagnosed Psychiatric Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1