Different levels of prepulse inhibition among patients with first-episode schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-01-18 Print Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1503/jpn.230083
Yue Sun, Qijing Bo, Zhen Mao, Qing Tian, Fang Dong, Liang Li, Chuanyue Wang
{"title":"Different levels of prepulse inhibition among patients with first-episode schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder.","authors":"Yue Sun, Qijing Bo, Zhen Mao, Qing Tian, Fang Dong, Liang Li, Chuanyue Wang","doi":"10.1503/jpn.230083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deficits in prepulse inhibition may be a common feature in first-episode schizophrenia, bipolar disorder (BD) and major depressive disorder (MDD). We sought to explore the levels and viability of prepulse inhibition to differentiate first-episode schizophrenia, BD and MDD in patient populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We tested patients with first-episode schizophrenia, BD or MDD and healthy controls using prepulse inhibition paradigms, namely perceived spatial co-location (PSC-PPI) and perceived spatial separation (PSS-PPI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 53 patients with first-episode schizophrenia, 30 with BD and 25 with MDD, as well as 82 healthy controls. The PSS-PPI indicated that the levels of prepulse inhibition were smallest to largest, respectively, in the first-episode schizophrenia, BD, MDD and control groups. Relative to the healthy controls, the prepulse inhibition deficits in the first-episode schizophrenia group were significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001), but the prepulse inhibitions were similar between patients with BD and healthy controls, and between patients with MDD and healthy controls. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that PSS-PPI (area under the curve [AUC] 0.73, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and latency (AUC 0.72, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were significant for differentiating patients with first-episode schizophrenia or BD from healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The demographics of the 4 groups were not ideally matched. We did not perform cognitive assessments. The possible confounding effect of medications on prepulse inhibition could not be eliminated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The level of prepulse inhibition among patients with first-episode schizophrenia was the lowest, with levels among patients with BD, patients with MDD and healthy controls increasingly higher. The PSS-PPI paradigm was more effective than PSC-PPI to recognize deficits in prepulse inhibition. These results provide a basis for further research on biological indicators that can assist differential diagnoses in psychosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience","volume":"49 1","pages":"E1-E10"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10803101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.230083","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Deficits in prepulse inhibition may be a common feature in first-episode schizophrenia, bipolar disorder (BD) and major depressive disorder (MDD). We sought to explore the levels and viability of prepulse inhibition to differentiate first-episode schizophrenia, BD and MDD in patient populations.

Methods: We tested patients with first-episode schizophrenia, BD or MDD and healthy controls using prepulse inhibition paradigms, namely perceived spatial co-location (PSC-PPI) and perceived spatial separation (PSS-PPI).

Results: We included 53 patients with first-episode schizophrenia, 30 with BD and 25 with MDD, as well as 82 healthy controls. The PSS-PPI indicated that the levels of prepulse inhibition were smallest to largest, respectively, in the first-episode schizophrenia, BD, MDD and control groups. Relative to the healthy controls, the prepulse inhibition deficits in the first-episode schizophrenia group were significant (p < 0.001), but the prepulse inhibitions were similar between patients with BD and healthy controls, and between patients with MDD and healthy controls. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that PSS-PPI (area under the curve [AUC] 0.73, p < 0.001) and latency (AUC 0.72, p < 0.001) were significant for differentiating patients with first-episode schizophrenia or BD from healthy controls.

Limitations: The demographics of the 4 groups were not ideally matched. We did not perform cognitive assessments. The possible confounding effect of medications on prepulse inhibition could not be eliminated.

Conclusion: The level of prepulse inhibition among patients with first-episode schizophrenia was the lowest, with levels among patients with BD, patients with MDD and healthy controls increasingly higher. The PSS-PPI paradigm was more effective than PSC-PPI to recognize deficits in prepulse inhibition. These results provide a basis for further research on biological indicators that can assist differential diagnoses in psychosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
首发精神分裂症、双相情感障碍和重度抑郁障碍患者的冲动抑制水平不同。
背景:冲动抑制缺陷可能是首发精神分裂症、双相情感障碍(BD)和重度抑郁障碍(MDD)的共同特征。我们试图探索前脉冲抑制的水平和可行性,以区分首发精神分裂症、双相情感障碍和重度抑郁症患者:我们使用前脉冲抑制范式,即感知空间同位(PSC-PPI)和感知空间分离(PSS-PPI),对首发精神分裂症、BD 或 MDD 患者和健康对照组进行了测试:我们纳入了 53 名首发精神分裂症患者、30 名 BD 患者和 25 名 MDD 患者,以及 82 名健康对照者。PSS-PPI显示,首次发作精神分裂症组、BD组、MDD组和对照组的冲动前抑制水平分别从低到高。与健康对照组相比,首发精神分裂症组的前脉冲抑制缺陷显著(P < 0.001),但 BD 患者与健康对照组之间、MDD 患者与健康对照组之间的前脉冲抑制相似。接受者操作特征曲线分析表明,PSS-PPI(曲线下面积[AUC] 0.73,p < 0.001)和潜伏期(AUC 0.72,p < 0.001)对区分首发精神分裂症或BD患者与健康对照组有显著意义:局限性:4组患者的人口统计学特征并不完全匹配。我们没有进行认知评估。局限性:我们没有进行认知评估,也没有排除药物对冲动抑制可能产生的混杂影响:初发精神分裂症患者的冲动抑制水平最低,而BD患者、MDD患者和健康对照组的水平则越来越高。PSS-PPI范式比PSC-PPI更能有效识别冲动前抑制的缺陷。这些结果为进一步研究有助于鉴别诊断精神病的生物指标奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience publishes papers at the intersection of psychiatry and neuroscience that advance our understanding of the neural mechanisms involved in the etiology and treatment of psychiatric disorders. This includes studies on patients with psychiatric disorders, healthy humans, and experimental animals as well as studies in vitro. Original research articles, including clinical trials with a mechanistic component, and review papers will be considered.
期刊最新文献
Decreased temporal variabilities of functional connectivities in insula and lingual gyrus are associated with better early treatment response in patients with panic disorder. Glutamate levels and symptom burden in high-risk and first-episode schizophrenia: a dual-voxel study of the anterior cingulate cortex. Altered neural activities during emotion regulation in depression: a meta-analysis. Beyond mood - depression as a speed disorder: biomarkers for abnormal slowness. Structural-informed functional MRI analysis of patients with empathy impairment following stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1