The narrative teacher: Narrative nonfiction as a teaching tool in the primary history classroom

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Review of Education Pub Date : 2024-01-16 DOI:10.1002/rev3.3459
Emma Browning, Jill Hohenstein
{"title":"The narrative teacher: Narrative nonfiction as a teaching tool in the primary history classroom","authors":"Emma Browning, Jill Hohenstein","doi":"10.1002/rev3.3459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Narrative is fundamental to human thought, yet in many classrooms, expository texts are commonly used to support learning in content-based subjects, such as history. Given the importance of narrative, it might be harnessed as a powerful tool to support learning. This research compares the impact of narrative nonfiction (NNF) and expository text (ET) on the development and retention of conceptual understanding relating to World War I (WWI). In an experiment involving 78 participants (mean age = 10.2 years, standard deviation = 0.29), pupils were placed into one of two conditions: in one, information about WWI was conveyed primarily through NNF texts, and in the other, through ETs. Participants completed written pre-, post- and delayed post-assessments to assess development and retention of conceptual understanding. It was found that participants in the NNF condition showed greater chronological and causal thinking skills. In addition, participants in the NNF condition retained significantly more conceptual understanding at delayed post-assessments than those in the ET condition. Overall, these findings suggest that narrative texts have the potential to be powerful learning tools. Implications for how texts are selected and utilised to support learning in the primary, history classroom are discussed.","PeriodicalId":45076,"journal":{"name":"Review of Education","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Narrative is fundamental to human thought, yet in many classrooms, expository texts are commonly used to support learning in content-based subjects, such as history. Given the importance of narrative, it might be harnessed as a powerful tool to support learning. This research compares the impact of narrative nonfiction (NNF) and expository text (ET) on the development and retention of conceptual understanding relating to World War I (WWI). In an experiment involving 78 participants (mean age = 10.2 years, standard deviation = 0.29), pupils were placed into one of two conditions: in one, information about WWI was conveyed primarily through NNF texts, and in the other, through ETs. Participants completed written pre-, post- and delayed post-assessments to assess development and retention of conceptual understanding. It was found that participants in the NNF condition showed greater chronological and causal thinking skills. In addition, participants in the NNF condition retained significantly more conceptual understanding at delayed post-assessments than those in the ET condition. Overall, these findings suggest that narrative texts have the potential to be powerful learning tools. Implications for how texts are selected and utilised to support learning in the primary, history classroom are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
叙事教师将叙事性非小说作为小学历史课堂教学工具
叙事是人类思维的基本要素,但在许多课堂上,说明性课文通常被用来支持以内容为基础的学科(如历史)的学习。鉴于叙事的重要性,可以将其作为支持学习的有力工具加以利用。本研究比较了叙事性非虚构文本(NNF)和说明性文本(ET)对第一次世界大战(WWI)相关概念理解的发展和保持的影响。在一项有 78 名参与者(平均年龄 = 10.2 岁,标准偏差 = 0.29)参加的实验中,学生们被分为两种情况:一种情况是主要通过非虚构叙事文本传达有关一战的信息,另一种情况是通过说明文本。参加者完成了书面的前评估、后评估和延迟后评估,以评估概念理解的发展和保持情况。结果发现,NNF 条件下的参与者表现出更强的时间和因果思维能力。此外,NNF 条件下的参与者在延迟后评估中保留的概念理解能力明显高于 ET 条件下的参与者。总之,这些研究结果表明,叙事文本有可能成为强大的学习工具。本文讨论了在小学历史课堂上如何选择和利用文本来支持学习的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Education
Review of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
The status of culturally relevant teacher education in the European context: A systematic review of research Effectiveness of language‐sensitive subject teaching: Heterogeneity and quality of the evidence and implications for future research Evaluation of the effectiveness of critical thinking training on critical thinking skills and academic achievement by using mixed‐meta method Research on teachers of colour and minoritised teachers in majoritarian education systems: A scoping review of the literature in the last two decades Generative AI in education and research: A systematic mapping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1