Methods and tools to screen and assess risks for intimate partner violence among women from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds in six high-income countries: A scoping review

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Journal of Family Violence Pub Date : 2024-01-17 DOI:10.1007/s10896-024-00682-3
Eliza Lock, Karina Reeves, Daniel Vujcich
{"title":"Methods and tools to screen and assess risks for intimate partner violence among women from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds in six high-income countries: A scoping review","authors":"Eliza Lock, Karina Reeves, Daniel Vujcich","doi":"10.1007/s10896-024-00682-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this review is to collate literature on approaches to screening women from culturally and linguistically diverse (CaLD) backgrounds for experiences of intimate partner violence (IPV) and assessing risks, with a view to identifying examples of best practice and research gaps.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A scoping review methodology was adopted. Medline (Ovid), Embase, CINALH and CENTRAL databases were searched, with supplementary searches for grey literature. Results were independently screened by two reviewers. Studies were included if they focused on women from CaLD backgrounds living in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, United Kingdom or United States of America being screened/assessed in a health setting in relation to IPV. Data on study characteristics and key findings were extracted and critical appraisal of study quality was performed.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>A total of <i>n </i>= 1,320 results were yielded. After deduplication, the titles and abstracts of <i>n </i>= 846 studies were screened. A total of <i>n </i>= 5 studies were included in the final analysis, and four screening or risk assessment tools/methods were assessed (Danger Assessment for Immigrant Women, Safe Start, Index of Spouse Abuse and Southern Asian Violence Screen).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Given the documented barriers to migrant help-seeking, screening and risk assessment has an important role to play in ensuring that women from CaLD backgrounds are linked into appropriate IPV support services in a timely manner. However, there is very limited evidence to demonstrate that existing screening/risk assessment tools and strategies meet the specific needs of CaLD populations, and more attention needs to be given to intersectional experiences of violence.</p>","PeriodicalId":48180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Violence","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-024-00682-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this review is to collate literature on approaches to screening women from culturally and linguistically diverse (CaLD) backgrounds for experiences of intimate partner violence (IPV) and assessing risks, with a view to identifying examples of best practice and research gaps.

Methods

A scoping review methodology was adopted. Medline (Ovid), Embase, CINALH and CENTRAL databases were searched, with supplementary searches for grey literature. Results were independently screened by two reviewers. Studies were included if they focused on women from CaLD backgrounds living in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, United Kingdom or United States of America being screened/assessed in a health setting in relation to IPV. Data on study characteristics and key findings were extracted and critical appraisal of study quality was performed.

Results

A total of = 1,320 results were yielded. After deduplication, the titles and abstracts of = 846 studies were screened. A total of = 5 studies were included in the final analysis, and four screening or risk assessment tools/methods were assessed (Danger Assessment for Immigrant Women, Safe Start, Index of Spouse Abuse and Southern Asian Violence Screen).

Conclusions

Given the documented barriers to migrant help-seeking, screening and risk assessment has an important role to play in ensuring that women from CaLD backgrounds are linked into appropriate IPV support services in a timely manner. However, there is very limited evidence to demonstrate that existing screening/risk assessment tools and strategies meet the specific needs of CaLD populations, and more attention needs to be given to intersectional experiences of violence.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
筛查和评估六个高收入国家中来自不同文化和语言背景的妇女遭受亲密伴侣暴力风险的方法和工具:范围界定审查
目的 本综述旨在整理有关亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)经历的文化和语言多样性(CaLD)背景妇女筛查方法和风险评估的文献,以确定最佳实践范例和研究差距。对 Medline (Ovid)、Embase、CINALH 和 CENTRAL 数据库进行了检索,并对灰色文献进行了补充检索。结果由两名审稿人独立筛选。如果研究的重点是居住在澳大利亚、加拿大、爱尔兰、新西兰、英国或美国的具有 CaLD 背景的女性在健康环境中接受与 IPV 相关的筛查/评估,则将其纳入研究范围。我们提取了有关研究特点和主要发现的数据,并对研究质量进行了严格评估。经过重复筛选,共筛选出 n = 846 项研究的标题和摘要。共有 n = 5 项研究被纳入最终分析,并对四种筛查或风险评估工具/方法(移民妇女危险评估、安全起步、配偶虐待指数和南亚暴力筛查)进行了评估。结论鉴于移民在寻求帮助时遇到的有据可查的障碍,筛查和风险评估在确保具有 CaLD 背景的妇女及时获得适当的 IPV 支持服务方面发挥着重要作用。然而,能够证明现有筛查/风险评估工具和策略能够满足 CaLD 群体特殊需求的证据非常有限,而且需要更加关注暴力的交叉体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Journal of Family Violence (JOFV) is a peer-reviewed publication committed to the dissemination of rigorous research on preventing, ending, and ameliorating all forms of family violence.  JOFV welcomes scholarly articles related to the broad categories of child abuse and maltreatment, dating violence, domestic and partner violence, and elder abuse. Within these categories, JOFV emphasizes research on physical violence, psychological violence, sexual violence, and homicides that occur in families. Studies on families in all their various forms and diversities are welcome.  JOFV publishes studies using quantitative, qualitative, and/or mixed methods involving the collection of primary data. Rigorous systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and theoretical analyses are also welcome. To help advance scientific understandings of family violence, JOFV is especially interested in research using transdisciplinary perspectives and innovative research methods. Because family violence is a global problem requiring solutions from diverse disciplinary perspectives, JOFV strongly encourages submissions from scholars worldwide from all disciplines and backgrounds.
期刊最新文献
Religious, Practical and Future-Oriented Coping Strategies to End Intimate Partner Violence: An In-Depth Examination of Ultraorthodox Israeli Women’s Narratives Domestic Violence and Custody Proceedings: An Analysis of Judicial Decisions in Portugal IPV exposure and mental and behavioral health in men during the COVID-19 An Exploratory Study of Safety Scenario Planning Among Ex-Partner Stalking Victims Post-separation Child Contact and Domestic Violence and Abuse: The Experiences of Children with a Disability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1