Compassionate Presence in Seriously Ill Cancer Patients.

M Renz, C Gloggner, D Bueche, U Renz
{"title":"Compassionate Presence in Seriously Ill Cancer Patients.","authors":"M Renz, C Gloggner, D Bueche, U Renz","doi":"10.1177/10499091241226629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i>: Compassion is a relational response to patients' suffering. Palliative care focuses not only on skills but also on compassion. Nevertheless, incorporated patient perspectives are largely missing from existing research. <i>Aim</i>: Our mixed-method exploratory study in a major Swiss cancer center sought to better understand compassionate presence, its benefits and challenges for patients and providers (ie, close relatives, close friends, and professionals-all referred to here as providers). It also investigated providers' motivation. <i>Method</i>: Twelve multidisciplinary, specially trained professionals interviewed 50 patients who had received compassionate presence. All patients had advanced cancer with risk of death. Providers were also interviewed. Data on the positive and burdensome effects of compassionate presence on patients and providers were gathered using a specific protocol. This also served to record patients' characteristics and providers' motivations to give compassion and whether providers felt sustained (eg, by nature). <i>Results</i>: The study suggests a high impact of compassionate presence with benefits on patients (50/50) and on providers (49/50). Enhanced connectedness was evident not only in the patient-provider relationship (38/50) but also, for instance, in an increased ability to love (8/50) or in an intensified solidarity (29/50). A considerable number of patients and providers experienced mental-spiritual change but also burdensome effects (eg, ambivalences). Providers showed a range of motivations. <i>Conclusion</i>: Compassion is not only necessary in existential crises and near death, but also happens and takes considerable effects precisely in such situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"1408-1422"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241226629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Compassion is a relational response to patients' suffering. Palliative care focuses not only on skills but also on compassion. Nevertheless, incorporated patient perspectives are largely missing from existing research. Aim: Our mixed-method exploratory study in a major Swiss cancer center sought to better understand compassionate presence, its benefits and challenges for patients and providers (ie, close relatives, close friends, and professionals-all referred to here as providers). It also investigated providers' motivation. Method: Twelve multidisciplinary, specially trained professionals interviewed 50 patients who had received compassionate presence. All patients had advanced cancer with risk of death. Providers were also interviewed. Data on the positive and burdensome effects of compassionate presence on patients and providers were gathered using a specific protocol. This also served to record patients' characteristics and providers' motivations to give compassion and whether providers felt sustained (eg, by nature). Results: The study suggests a high impact of compassionate presence with benefits on patients (50/50) and on providers (49/50). Enhanced connectedness was evident not only in the patient-provider relationship (38/50) but also, for instance, in an increased ability to love (8/50) or in an intensified solidarity (29/50). A considerable number of patients and providers experienced mental-spiritual change but also burdensome effects (eg, ambivalences). Providers showed a range of motivations. Conclusion: Compassion is not only necessary in existential crises and near death, but also happens and takes considerable effects precisely in such situations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对重症癌症患者给予同情。
背景:同情是对病人痛苦的一种关系性反应。姑息关怀不仅注重技能,也注重同情心。然而,现有的研究在很大程度上没有纳入病人的视角。目的:我们在瑞士一家大型癌症中心开展了一项混合方法探索性研究,旨在更好地了解患者和提供者(即近亲、密友和专业人士,此处均称为提供者)的同情存在、其益处和挑战。研究还调查了提供者的动机。研究方法:12 位接受过专门培训的多学科专业人员对 50 位接受过 "同情陪伴 "的患者进行了访谈。所有患者都是有死亡风险的晚期癌症患者。提供者也接受了访谈。通过特定的协议,收集了有关 "同情陪伴 "对患者和提供者的积极影响和负担的数据。这也有助于记录患者的特征和提供者给予同情的动机,以及提供者是否感觉到了支持(例如,自然)。研究结果研究表明,富有同情心的陪伴对患者(50/50)和服务提供者(49/50)都有很大影响。联系性的增强不仅体现在病人与医护人员的关系上(38/50),还体现在爱的能力的提高(8/50)或团结的加强(29/50)等方面。相当多的病人和医疗服务提供者经历了精神上的变化,但也有一些负担(如矛盾心理)。医疗服务提供者表现出不同的动机。结论同情不仅在生存危机和濒临死亡时是必要的,而且恰恰在这种情况下会发生并产生相当大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Knowledge and Attitude of the General Public Toward Palliative Care in Jordan: A Cross-Sectional Study. Differences in Attitudes and Barriers Towards Advance Care Planning Amongst Ischemic Heart Disease Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study. A Mixed Methods Analysis of Standardized Documentation of Serious Illness Conversations Within an Electronic Health Record Module During Hospitalization. Palliative and End-of-Life Care Interventions with Minoritized Populations in the US with Serious Illness: A Scoping Review. Exploring Palliative Care Needs Among Patients With Cancer and Non-Cancer Serious Chronic Diseases: A Comparison Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1