Resident and Caregiver Dyads Talk About Death and Dying in Assisted Living: A Typology of Communication Behaviors.

Ann E Vandenberg, Alexis A Bender, Candace L Kemp, Molly M Perkins
{"title":"Resident and Caregiver Dyads Talk About Death and Dying in Assisted Living: A Typology of Communication Behaviors.","authors":"Ann E Vandenberg, Alexis A Bender, Candace L Kemp, Molly M Perkins","doi":"10.1177/10499091231225960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the U.S., assisted living (AL) is increasingly a site of death, and anxiety about dying has been identified in long-term care residents and their caregivers. Communication about death and dying is associated with better quality of life and care at end of life (EOL).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand communication behaviors used by AL residents and their informal caregivers (i.e., family members or friends) related to death and dying, and address communication needs or opportunities applicable to EOL care in AL.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A thematic analysis of in-depth interviews and fieldnotes from a subsample of data from a 5-year NIA-funded study.</p><p><strong>Setting/subjects: </strong>Participants included 15 resident-caregiver dyads from three diverse AL communities in Atlanta, Georgia in the U.S.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Interview transcripts were coded for communication behavior. Concordances and discordances within dyads were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a typology of four dyadic communication behaviors: Talking (i.e., both partners were talking with each other about death), Blocking (i.e., one partner wanted to talk about death but the other did not), Avoiding (i.e., each partner perceived that the other did not want to communicate about death), and Unable (i.e., dyads could not communicate about death because of interpersonal barriers).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Older residents in AL often want to talk about death but are blocked from doing so by an informal caregiver. Caregivers and AL residents may benefit from training in death communication. Recommendations for improving advance care planning and promoting better EOL communication includes timing these conversations before the opportunity is lost.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11258204/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091231225960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the U.S., assisted living (AL) is increasingly a site of death, and anxiety about dying has been identified in long-term care residents and their caregivers. Communication about death and dying is associated with better quality of life and care at end of life (EOL).

Objective: To understand communication behaviors used by AL residents and their informal caregivers (i.e., family members or friends) related to death and dying, and address communication needs or opportunities applicable to EOL care in AL.

Design: A thematic analysis of in-depth interviews and fieldnotes from a subsample of data from a 5-year NIA-funded study.

Setting/subjects: Participants included 15 resident-caregiver dyads from three diverse AL communities in Atlanta, Georgia in the U.S.

Measurements: Interview transcripts were coded for communication behavior. Concordances and discordances within dyads were examined.

Results: We identified a typology of four dyadic communication behaviors: Talking (i.e., both partners were talking with each other about death), Blocking (i.e., one partner wanted to talk about death but the other did not), Avoiding (i.e., each partner perceived that the other did not want to communicate about death), and Unable (i.e., dyads could not communicate about death because of interpersonal barriers).

Conclusions: Older residents in AL often want to talk about death but are blocked from doing so by an informal caregiver. Caregivers and AL residents may benefit from training in death communication. Recommendations for improving advance care planning and promoting better EOL communication includes timing these conversations before the opportunity is lost.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
居住者和护理者二人组在辅助生活设施中谈论死亡和临终:交流行为的类型学。
背景:在美国,辅助生活(AL)越来越多地成为死亡的场所,长期护理居民及其护理人员对死亡的焦虑已经得到确认。关于死亡和临终的交流与更好的生活质量和临终关怀有关:了解长期护理住院者及其非正式护理者(即家庭成员或朋友)与死亡和临终有关的沟通行为,并解决适用于长期护理住院者临终关怀的沟通需求或机会:对一项为期 5 年、由国家卫生研究所资助的研究中的子样本数据进行深入访谈和现场记录的主题分析:参与者包括来自美国佐治亚州亚特兰大市三个不同 AL 社区的 15 个居民-护理人员二人组:对访谈记录进行沟通行为编码。结果:我们发现了四种类型的居住者-护理者二人组:结果:我们确定了四种二人交流行为的类型:交谈(即双方都与对方谈论死亡)、阻止(即一方想谈论死亡,但另一方不想)、回避(即双方都认为对方不想谈论死亡)和无法(即由于人际障碍,两人无法就死亡进行交流):结论:住在养老院的老年居民通常都想谈论死亡,但却受到非正式照护者的阻挠。护理人员和老年住户可能会从死亡沟通的培训中受益。改善预先护理计划和促进更好的临终沟通的建议包括在失去机会之前把握好这些对话的时机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Symptoms and Prognoses of Patients With Breast Cancer and Malignant Wounds in Palliative Care Units: The Multicenter, Prospective, Observational EASED Study. Development and Validation of the Home Hospice Care Needs Questionnaire for the Dying Old Adult (HHCNQ-DE) in Mainland China. Long-Term Impact of the End-of-Life Care Nursing Education Consortium on Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice (KAP) of Indian Nurses Working in Non-Palliative Care Settings: A KAP-GAP Analysis. The Perspective of Cancer Patients in Palliative Care on Unmet Needs: A Qualitative Synthesis Using Meta-Ethnography. Caring for Patients Requiring Venous Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Can Upstream Palliative Care Make a Difference?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1