Micro-Simulation Insights into the Safety and Operational Benefits of Autonomous Vehicles

Nalin Kumar Sekar;Vinayak Malaghan;Digvijay S. Pawar
{"title":"Micro-Simulation Insights into the Safety and Operational Benefits of Autonomous Vehicles","authors":"Nalin Kumar Sekar;Vinayak Malaghan;Digvijay S. Pawar","doi":"10.26599/JICV.2023.9210007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several past studies showed that Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) can reduce crash risk, stop-and-go traffic, and travel time. To analyze the safety benefits of AVs, most of the researchers proposed algorithms and simulation-based techniques. However, these studies have not assessed the safety benefits of AVs for different vehicle types under heterogeneous conditions. With this opportunity, this study focuses on the benefits of AVs in terms of safety for different penetration rates under heterogeneous conditions. This study considered three driving logics during peak hour conditions to assess the performance of AVs in terms of safety. In VISSIM, default driving behavior models for AVs were adopted to consider cautious and all-knowing driving logic and the third driving logic (Atkins) was modeled in VISSIM using parameters adopted from the previous studies. To this end, using VISSIM, the travel time output results were obtained. Also, using Surrogate Safety Assessment Model (SSAM), conflicts were extracted from output trajectory files (VISSIM). The results suggest that “cautious driving logic” reduced travel time and crash risk significantly when compared to the other two driving logics during peak hour conditions. Furthermore, the statistical analysis clearly demonstrated that “cautious driving logic” differs significantly from the other two driving logics. When Market Penetration Rates (MPR) were 50% or greater, the “cautious driving logic” significantly outperforms the other two driving logics. The results highlight that adopting “cautious driving logic” at an expressway may significantly increase safety at higher AV penetration rates (above 50%).","PeriodicalId":100793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles","volume":"6 4","pages":"202-210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10409209","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10409209/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several past studies showed that Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) can reduce crash risk, stop-and-go traffic, and travel time. To analyze the safety benefits of AVs, most of the researchers proposed algorithms and simulation-based techniques. However, these studies have not assessed the safety benefits of AVs for different vehicle types under heterogeneous conditions. With this opportunity, this study focuses on the benefits of AVs in terms of safety for different penetration rates under heterogeneous conditions. This study considered three driving logics during peak hour conditions to assess the performance of AVs in terms of safety. In VISSIM, default driving behavior models for AVs were adopted to consider cautious and all-knowing driving logic and the third driving logic (Atkins) was modeled in VISSIM using parameters adopted from the previous studies. To this end, using VISSIM, the travel time output results were obtained. Also, using Surrogate Safety Assessment Model (SSAM), conflicts were extracted from output trajectory files (VISSIM). The results suggest that “cautious driving logic” reduced travel time and crash risk significantly when compared to the other two driving logics during peak hour conditions. Furthermore, the statistical analysis clearly demonstrated that “cautious driving logic” differs significantly from the other two driving logics. When Market Penetration Rates (MPR) were 50% or greater, the “cautious driving logic” significantly outperforms the other two driving logics. The results highlight that adopting “cautious driving logic” at an expressway may significantly increase safety at higher AV penetration rates (above 50%).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过微观模拟深入了解自动驾驶汽车的安全和运营优势
过去的一些研究表明,自动驾驶汽车(AVs)可以降低碰撞风险、减少走走停停的交通流量和旅行时间。为了分析自动驾驶汽车的安全效益,大多数研究人员提出了基于算法和模拟的技术。然而,这些研究并未评估不同车辆类型在不同条件下的自动驾驶汽车安全效益。本研究以此为契机,重点研究了在异构条件下不同渗透率的自动驾驶汽车在安全方面的优势。本研究考虑了高峰时段的三种驾驶逻辑,以评估自动驾驶汽车的安全性能。在 VISSIM 中,采用了自动驾驶汽车的默认驾驶行为模型,以考虑谨慎和全知驾驶逻辑,并在 VISSIM 中使用先前研究中采用的参数对第三种驾驶逻辑(阿特金斯)进行建模。为此,利用 VISSIM 获得了旅行时间输出结果。此外,还使用代用安全评估模型(SSAM)从输出轨迹文件(VISSIM)中提取了冲突。结果表明,与其他两种驾驶逻辑相比,"谨慎驾驶逻辑 "大大减少了高峰时段的行车时间和碰撞风险。此外,统计分析清楚地表明,"谨慎驾驶逻辑 "与其他两种驾驶逻辑有明显不同。当市场渗透率(MPR)达到或超过 50%时,"谨慎驾驶逻辑 "明显优于其他两种驾驶逻辑。结果突出表明,在高速公路上采用 "谨慎驾驶逻辑 "可能会在更高的自动驾驶普及率(50% 以上)下显著提高安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Front Cover Contents Advancements and Prospects in Multisensor Fusion for Autonomous Driving Extracting Networkwide Road Segment Location, Direction, and Turning Movement Rules From Global Positioning System Vehicle Trajectory Data for Macrosimulation Decision Making and Control of Autonomous Vehicles Under the Condition of Front Vehicle Sideslip
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1