Environmental filtering is the primary driver of community assembly in forest–grassland mosaics: A case study based on CSR strategies

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Journal of Vegetation Science Pub Date : 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1111/jvs.13228
László Erdős, Khanh Vu Ho, Ákos Bede-Fazekas, György Kröel-Dulay, Csaba Tölgyesi, Zoltán Bátori, Péter Török
{"title":"Environmental filtering is the primary driver of community assembly in forest–grassland mosaics: A case study based on CSR strategies","authors":"László Erdős,&nbsp;Khanh Vu Ho,&nbsp;Ákos Bede-Fazekas,&nbsp;György Kröel-Dulay,&nbsp;Csaba Tölgyesi,&nbsp;Zoltán Bátori,&nbsp;Péter Török","doi":"10.1111/jvs.13228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Ecological strategies can provide information about plant community assembly and its main drivers. Our aim was to reveal the dominant strategies of the vegetation types of forest–grassland mosaics and to deduce the assembly processes responsible for their species composition.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Hungary.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We investigated eight vegetation types of Hungarian forest–steppes. The trade-off between three key traits related to leaf size and economics was used to calculate Grime's competitive–stress tolerance–ruderal (CSR) value for each species, based on which the mean value for each vegetation type was determined. Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) ordination was used to reveal the compositional differences among the vegetation types under study. To analyze how ecological strategies correlate with the compositional gradient, we used linear regression between plot ordination scores (the first DCA scores) and each strategy (C, S, and R). Linear mixed-effect models were used to evaluate the differences between the vegetation types regarding each strategy (C, S, and R).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Each vegetation type was dominated by the stress-tolerator strategy, indicating the prominent role of environmental filtering in community assembly. However, ecological strategies differed significantly among the communities. The importance of the stress-tolerator strategy decreased toward the less harsh end of the gradient (i.e., from grasslands to forests), while the competitor strategy showed a reverse pattern. The ruderal strategy was weakly correlated with the gradient, although its proportion increased toward the harsh end of the gradient.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>With ongoing climate change, an increasing importance of environmental filtering is expected in the assembly of the vegetation types in the studied forest–grassland mosaics. We suggest that CSR strategies offer a useful tool for studying plant-community assembly rules along environmental gradients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vegetation Science","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jvs.13228","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vegetation Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvs.13228","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

Ecological strategies can provide information about plant community assembly and its main drivers. Our aim was to reveal the dominant strategies of the vegetation types of forest–grassland mosaics and to deduce the assembly processes responsible for their species composition.

Location

Hungary.

Methods

We investigated eight vegetation types of Hungarian forest–steppes. The trade-off between three key traits related to leaf size and economics was used to calculate Grime's competitive–stress tolerance–ruderal (CSR) value for each species, based on which the mean value for each vegetation type was determined. Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) ordination was used to reveal the compositional differences among the vegetation types under study. To analyze how ecological strategies correlate with the compositional gradient, we used linear regression between plot ordination scores (the first DCA scores) and each strategy (C, S, and R). Linear mixed-effect models were used to evaluate the differences between the vegetation types regarding each strategy (C, S, and R).

Results

Each vegetation type was dominated by the stress-tolerator strategy, indicating the prominent role of environmental filtering in community assembly. However, ecological strategies differed significantly among the communities. The importance of the stress-tolerator strategy decreased toward the less harsh end of the gradient (i.e., from grasslands to forests), while the competitor strategy showed a reverse pattern. The ruderal strategy was weakly correlated with the gradient, although its proportion increased toward the harsh end of the gradient.

Conclusions

With ongoing climate change, an increasing importance of environmental filtering is expected in the assembly of the vegetation types in the studied forest–grassland mosaics. We suggest that CSR strategies offer a useful tool for studying plant-community assembly rules along environmental gradients.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环境过滤是森林-草原镶嵌区群落集结的主要驱动力:基于企业社会责任战略的案例研究
目的 生态策略可以提供有关植物群落组合及其主要驱动因素的信息。我们的目的是揭示森林-草地镶嵌区植被类型的主要策略,并推断出造成其物种组成的集合过程。 地点:匈牙利 方法 我们调查了匈牙利森林-草原的八种植被类型。利用与叶片大小和经济性相关的三个关键性状之间的权衡来计算每个物种的格里姆竞争-压力-耐受-粗放(CSR)值,并在此基础上确定每个植被类型的平均值。利用去趋势对应分析(DCA)排序法揭示了所研究植被类型之间的成分差异。为了分析生态策略与成分梯度之间的相关性,我们使用了地块排序得分(第一个 DCA 分数)与每种策略(C、S 和 R)之间的线性回归。线性混合效应模型用于评估植被类型在每种策略(C、S 和 R)方面的差异。 结果 每种植被类型都以压力-调节策略为主,这表明环境过滤在群落组合中起着重要作用。然而,不同群落之间的生态策略有很大差异。压力-调节策略的重要性在梯度较低的一端(即从草地到森林)降低,而竞争策略则呈现相反的模式。粗放型策略与梯度的相关性较弱,但其比例在梯度的严酷一端有所增加。 结论 随着气候变化的不断加剧,在所研究的森林-草地镶嵌区植被类型的组合过程中,环境过滤的重要性将不断增加。我们认为,CSR 策略为研究植物群落在环境梯度上的组合规则提供了有用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vegetation Science
Journal of Vegetation Science 环境科学-林学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
60
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vegetation Science publishes papers on all aspects of plant community ecology, with particular emphasis on papers that develop new concepts or methods, test theory, identify general patterns, or that are otherwise likely to interest a broad international readership. Papers may focus on any aspect of vegetation science, e.g. community structure (including community assembly and plant functional types), biodiversity (including species richness and composition), spatial patterns (including plant geography and landscape ecology), temporal changes (including demography, community dynamics and palaeoecology) and processes (including ecophysiology), provided the focus is on increasing our understanding of plant communities. The Journal publishes papers on the ecology of a single species only if it plays a key role in structuring plant communities. Papers that apply ecological concepts, theories and methods to the vegetation management, conservation and restoration, and papers on vegetation survey should be directed to our associate journal, Applied Vegetation Science journal.
期刊最新文献
Role of Plant Specialists in Fine-Scale Diversity–Area Relationships (DARs) in Southern European Atlantic Coastal Dunes Willow above, changes below: Seedless tree invader impacts riparian seed bank in the Patagonian ecotone Repeat photography reveals long-term climate change impacts on sub-Antarctic tundra vegetation Mammalian herbivory alters structure, composition and edaphic conditions of a grey-dune community Short-term vegetation shifts in an alpine grassland under current and simulated climate change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1