Evaluation of transmission risk of respiratory particles under different ventilation strategies in an elevator

IF 6.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Building Simulation Pub Date : 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1007/s12273-024-1102-0
Liangyu Zhu, Xian Li, Bujin Feng, Fan Liu
{"title":"Evaluation of transmission risk of respiratory particles under different ventilation strategies in an elevator","authors":"Liangyu Zhu, Xian Li, Bujin Feng, Fan Liu","doi":"10.1007/s12273-024-1102-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>People in elevators are at risk of respiratory infection because the elevator cabin is crowded and has poor ventilation. The exhaled particles may be inhaled by the susceptible person, deposited on the surface and suspended in the elevator, which can result in direct and indirect transmission. However, whether the air vent designs adopted in the elevator can effectively reduce the transmission risk of respiratory particles remains unknown. In this study, the dispersion of particles under four common ventilation strategies used in the commercial elevator was investigated by proven computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The flow field was simulated with the RNG k-ξ turbulence model and the Lagrangian method was adopted to track particle trajectories. The effects of air vent layout and airflow rate on particle transmission were analyzed. We found that more than 50% of exhaled particles (average value) were suspended in the cabin and difficult to discharge under the investigated ventilation strategies. The deposited fraction of particles on the susceptible person reached up to 39.14% for infiltration ventilation, which led to a high risk of contact infection. Increasing the ventilation rate could not significantly reduce the inhalation proportion of particles due to the poor airflow distribution inside the elevator. A more proper ventilation strategy should be explored for the elevator to control transmission risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":49226,"journal":{"name":"Building Simulation","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-024-1102-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People in elevators are at risk of respiratory infection because the elevator cabin is crowded and has poor ventilation. The exhaled particles may be inhaled by the susceptible person, deposited on the surface and suspended in the elevator, which can result in direct and indirect transmission. However, whether the air vent designs adopted in the elevator can effectively reduce the transmission risk of respiratory particles remains unknown. In this study, the dispersion of particles under four common ventilation strategies used in the commercial elevator was investigated by proven computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The flow field was simulated with the RNG k-ξ turbulence model and the Lagrangian method was adopted to track particle trajectories. The effects of air vent layout and airflow rate on particle transmission were analyzed. We found that more than 50% of exhaled particles (average value) were suspended in the cabin and difficult to discharge under the investigated ventilation strategies. The deposited fraction of particles on the susceptible person reached up to 39.14% for infiltration ventilation, which led to a high risk of contact infection. Increasing the ventilation rate could not significantly reduce the inhalation proportion of particles due to the poor airflow distribution inside the elevator. A more proper ventilation strategy should be explored for the elevator to control transmission risk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电梯内不同通风策略下呼吸道微粒传播风险评估
由于电梯轿厢拥挤且通风不良,乘坐电梯的人有可能受到呼吸道感染。呼出的微粒可能被易感人群吸入、沉积在电梯表面和悬浮在电梯内,从而导致直接和间接传播。然而,电梯采用的通风口设计能否有效降低呼吸道微粒的传播风险仍是未知数。本研究通过可靠的计算流体动力学(CFD)模拟,研究了商业电梯中四种常用通风策略下的颗粒扩散情况。采用 RNG k-ξ 湍流模型模拟流场,并采用拉格朗日方法跟踪粒子轨迹。分析了通风口布局和气流速度对粒子传播的影响。我们发现,在所研究的通风策略下,超过 50% 的呼出颗粒(平均值)悬浮在机舱内,难以排出。在渗透式通风中,易感人群身上的颗粒沉积率高达 39.14%,导致接触感染的风险很高。由于电梯内气流分布不均,提高通风率并不能显著降低微粒的吸入比例。为控制传播风险,电梯应采用更合适的通风策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Building Simulation
Building Simulation THERMODYNAMICS-CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
16.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Building Simulation: An International Journal publishes original, high quality, peer-reviewed research papers and review articles dealing with modeling and simulation of buildings including their systems. The goal is to promote the field of building science and technology to such a level that modeling will eventually be used in every aspect of building construction as a routine instead of an exception. Of particular interest are papers that reflect recent developments and applications of modeling tools and their impact on advances of building science and technology.
期刊最新文献
Evolving multi-objective optimization framework for early-stage building design: Improving energy efficiency, daylighting, view quality, and thermal comfort An integrated framework utilizing machine learning to accelerate the optimization of energy-efficient urban block forms Exploring the impact of evaluation methods on Global South building design—A case study in Brazil Mitigation of long-term heat extraction attenuation of U-type medium-deep borehole heat exchanger by climate change Developing an integrated prediction model for daylighting, thermal comfort, and energy consumption in residential buildings based on the stacking ensemble learning algorithm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1