Sensitivity of antenatal ultrasound in diagnosing posterior placenta accreta spectrum disorders

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Perinatal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1515/jpm-2023-0491
Gabriela Dellapiana, Thalia Mok, Lawrence D. Platt, Neil S. Silverman, Christina S. Han, Tania F. Esakoff
{"title":"Sensitivity of antenatal ultrasound in diagnosing posterior placenta accreta spectrum disorders","authors":"Gabriela Dellapiana, Thalia Mok, Lawrence D. Platt, Neil S. Silverman, Christina S. Han, Tania F. Esakoff","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2023-0491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives Optimal management of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) requires antenatal diagnosis. We sought to evaluate the sensitivity of ultrasound findings suggestive of PAS in detecting posterior PAS. Methods Cohort study of patients with posterior placentation and pathology-confirmed PAS from 2011 to 2020 at a tertiary center. Patients were excluded if ultrasound images were unavailable. Ultrasounds were reviewed for presence of lacunae, hypervascularity, myometrial thinning, loss of the hypoechoic zone, bridging vessels, abnormal uterine serosa–bladder interface, placental bulge, placental extension into/beyond the myometrium, and an exophytic mass. Risk factors, postpartum outcomes, and ultrasound findings were compared by antepartum suspicion for PAS. Sensitivity was calculated for each ultrasound finding. Results Thirty-three patients were included. PAS was not suspected antenatally in 70 % (23/33). Patients with unsuspected PAS were more likely to be non-Hispanic, have <jats:italic>in vitro</jats:italic> fertilization, no prior Cesarean deliveries, no placenta previa, and delivered later in gestation. Depth of invasion and estimated blood loss were less for unsuspected PAS, but there was no difference in hysterectomy between groups. Ultrasound findings were less frequently seen in those who were not suspected antenatally: lacunae 17.4 vs. 100 % (p&lt;0.001), hypervascularity 8.7 vs. 80 % (p&lt;0.001), myometrial thinning 4.4 vs. 70 % (p&lt;0.001), and placental bridging vessels 0 vs. 60 % (p&lt;0.001). There was poor sensitivity (0–42.4 %) for all findings. Conclusions Posterior PAS is less likely to be detected antenatally due to a lower sensitivity of typical ultrasound findings in the setting of a posterior placenta. Further studies are needed to better identify reliable markers of posterior PAS.","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2023-0491","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives Optimal management of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) requires antenatal diagnosis. We sought to evaluate the sensitivity of ultrasound findings suggestive of PAS in detecting posterior PAS. Methods Cohort study of patients with posterior placentation and pathology-confirmed PAS from 2011 to 2020 at a tertiary center. Patients were excluded if ultrasound images were unavailable. Ultrasounds were reviewed for presence of lacunae, hypervascularity, myometrial thinning, loss of the hypoechoic zone, bridging vessels, abnormal uterine serosa–bladder interface, placental bulge, placental extension into/beyond the myometrium, and an exophytic mass. Risk factors, postpartum outcomes, and ultrasound findings were compared by antepartum suspicion for PAS. Sensitivity was calculated for each ultrasound finding. Results Thirty-three patients were included. PAS was not suspected antenatally in 70 % (23/33). Patients with unsuspected PAS were more likely to be non-Hispanic, have in vitro fertilization, no prior Cesarean deliveries, no placenta previa, and delivered later in gestation. Depth of invasion and estimated blood loss were less for unsuspected PAS, but there was no difference in hysterectomy between groups. Ultrasound findings were less frequently seen in those who were not suspected antenatally: lacunae 17.4 vs. 100 % (p<0.001), hypervascularity 8.7 vs. 80 % (p<0.001), myometrial thinning 4.4 vs. 70 % (p<0.001), and placental bridging vessels 0 vs. 60 % (p<0.001). There was poor sensitivity (0–42.4 %) for all findings. Conclusions Posterior PAS is less likely to be detected antenatally due to a lower sensitivity of typical ultrasound findings in the setting of a posterior placenta. Further studies are needed to better identify reliable markers of posterior PAS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产前超声诊断后置胎盘频谱紊乱的敏感性
目的 胎盘早剥谱(PAS)的最佳处理需要产前诊断。我们试图评估提示 PAS 的超声检查结果对检测后置胎盘的敏感性。方法 对一家三级中心 2011 年至 2020 年期间患有后置胎盘并经病理学证实为 PAS 的患者进行队列研究。如果无法获得超声图像,则排除患者。对超声图像进行审查,以确定是否存在裂隙、血管过多、子宫肌层变薄、低回声区消失、桥接血管、子宫浆膜-膀胱界面异常、胎盘隆起、胎盘延伸至/超出子宫肌层以及外生肿块。根据产前对 PAS 的怀疑程度,比较了风险因素、产后结局和超声检查结果。计算了每种超声检查结果的敏感性。结果 共纳入 33 名患者。70%的患者(23/33)在产前未怀疑过 PAS。未怀疑 PAS 的患者多为非西班牙裔、体外受精、无剖宫产史、无前置胎盘、妊娠晚期分娩。未怀疑 PAS 的侵犯深度和估计失血量较少,但各组间的子宫切除术没有差异。产前未怀疑有前置胎盘者超声检查结果较少出现:裂隙 17.4% 对 100%(p<0.001),血管过多 8.7% 对 80%(p<0.001),子宫肌层变薄 4.4% 对 70%(p<0.001),胎盘桥接血管 0% 对 60%(p<0.001)。所有结果的灵敏度都很低(0-42.4%)。结论 由于在后置胎盘的情况下典型超声检查结果的敏感性较低,因此在产前发现后置胎盘的可能性较低。需要进一步研究以更好地确定后置胎盘的可靠标记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Journal of Perinatal Medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Placental fetal vascular malperfusion in maternal diabetes mellitus. Effects of a respiratory function indicator light on visual attention and ventilation quality during neonatal resuscitation: a randomised controlled crossover simulation trial. External validation of a non-invasive vaginal tool to assess the risk of intra-amniotic inflammation in pregnant women with preterm labor and intact membranes. The value of ultrasound spectra of middle cerebral artery and umbilical artery blood flow in adverse pregnancy outcomes. A family-centric, comprehensive nurse-led home oxygen programme for neonatal chronic lung disease: home oxygen policy evaluation (HOPE) study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1