Kathelijne Koops, Walter Akankwasa, Henry Didier Camara, Maegan Fitzgerald, Alex Keir, Gnan Mamy, Tetsuro Matsuzawa, Hella Péter, Kizza Vicent, Klaus Zuberbühler, Catherine Hobaiter
{"title":"Flexible grouping patterns in a western and eastern chimpanzee community","authors":"Kathelijne Koops, Walter Akankwasa, Henry Didier Camara, Maegan Fitzgerald, Alex Keir, Gnan Mamy, Tetsuro Matsuzawa, Hella Péter, Kizza Vicent, Klaus Zuberbühler, Catherine Hobaiter","doi":"10.1002/ajp.23593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Primate social organizations, or grouping patterns, vary significantly across species. Behavioral strategies that allow for flexibility in grouping patterns offer a means to reduce the costs of group living. Chimpanzees (<i>Pan troglodytes</i>) have a fission-fusion social system in which temporary subgroups (“parties”) change in composition because of local socio-ecological conditions. Notably, western chimpanzees (<i>P. t. verus</i>) are described as showing a higher degree of bisexual bonding and association than eastern chimpanzees, and eastern female chimpanzees (<i>P. t. schweinfurthii</i>) are thought to be more solitary than western female chimpanzees. However, reported comparisons in sociality currently depend on a small number of study groups, particularly in western chimpanzees, and variation in methods. The inclusion of additional communities and direct comparison using the same methods are essential to assess whether reported subspecies differences in sociality hold in this behaviorally heterogeneous species. We explored whether sociality differs between two communities of chimpanzees using the same motion-triggered camera technology and definitions of social measures. We compare party size and composition (party type, sex ratio) between the western Gahtoy community in the Nimba Mountains (Guinea) and the eastern Waibira community in the Budongo Forest (Uganda). Once potential competition for resources such as food and mating opportunities were controlled for, subspecies did not substantially influence the number of individuals in a party. We found a higher sex-ratio, indicating more males in a party, in Waibira; this pattern was driven by a greater likelihood in Gahtoy to be in all-female parties. This finding is the opposite of what was expected for eastern chimpanzees, where female-only parties are predicted to be more common. Our results highlight the flexibility in chimpanzee sociality, and caution against subspecies level generalizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7662,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Primatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajp.23593","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Primatology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajp.23593","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Primate social organizations, or grouping patterns, vary significantly across species. Behavioral strategies that allow for flexibility in grouping patterns offer a means to reduce the costs of group living. Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) have a fission-fusion social system in which temporary subgroups (“parties”) change in composition because of local socio-ecological conditions. Notably, western chimpanzees (P. t. verus) are described as showing a higher degree of bisexual bonding and association than eastern chimpanzees, and eastern female chimpanzees (P. t. schweinfurthii) are thought to be more solitary than western female chimpanzees. However, reported comparisons in sociality currently depend on a small number of study groups, particularly in western chimpanzees, and variation in methods. The inclusion of additional communities and direct comparison using the same methods are essential to assess whether reported subspecies differences in sociality hold in this behaviorally heterogeneous species. We explored whether sociality differs between two communities of chimpanzees using the same motion-triggered camera technology and definitions of social measures. We compare party size and composition (party type, sex ratio) between the western Gahtoy community in the Nimba Mountains (Guinea) and the eastern Waibira community in the Budongo Forest (Uganda). Once potential competition for resources such as food and mating opportunities were controlled for, subspecies did not substantially influence the number of individuals in a party. We found a higher sex-ratio, indicating more males in a party, in Waibira; this pattern was driven by a greater likelihood in Gahtoy to be in all-female parties. This finding is the opposite of what was expected for eastern chimpanzees, where female-only parties are predicted to be more common. Our results highlight the flexibility in chimpanzee sociality, and caution against subspecies level generalizations.
灵长类动物的社会组织或群居模式在不同物种之间存在很大差异。允许群居模式具有灵活性的行为策略为降低群居成本提供了一种手段。黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)有一种裂变-融合的社会系统,在这种系统中,临时的亚群("党派")的组成会因当地的社会生态条件而改变。值得注意的是,西部黑猩猩(P. t. verus)被描述为比东部黑猩猩表现出更高程度的双性结合和联合,而东部雌性黑猩猩(P. t. schweinfurthii)被认为比西部雌性黑猩猩更孤独。然而,目前所报道的社会性比较依赖于少数研究群体,特别是西部黑猩猩,以及方法上的差异。纳入更多的群落并使用相同的方法进行直接比较,对于评估在这一行为异质性物种中报告的社会性亚种差异是否成立至关重要。我们探索了两个黑猩猩群落之间的社会性是否存在差异,使用的是相同的运动触发相机技术和社会性测量的定义。我们比较了宁巴山脉(几内亚)西部 Gahtoy 黑猩猩群落和布东戈森林(乌干达)东部 Waibira 黑猩猩群落之间黑猩猩群落的规模和组成(群落类型、性别比例)。一旦控制了对食物和交配机会等资源的潜在竞争,亚种并不会对聚会中的个体数量产生重大影响。我们发现,Waibira的性别比例较高,表明聚会中雄性较多;这种模式是由于Gahtoy更有可能参加全为雌性的聚会。这一发现与东部黑猩猩的预期相反,在东部黑猩猩中,只有雌性的聚会更为常见。我们的研究结果突显了黑猩猩社会性的灵活性,并提醒我们不要在亚种水平上一概而论。
期刊介绍:
The objective of the American Journal of Primatology is to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas and findings among primatologists and to convey our increasing understanding of this order of animals to specialists and interested readers alike.
Primatology is an unusual science in that its practitioners work in a wide variety of departments and institutions, live in countries throughout the world, and carry out a vast range of research procedures. Whether we are anthropologists, psychologists, biologists, or medical researchers, whether we live in Japan, Kenya, Brazil, or the United States, whether we conduct naturalistic observations in the field or experiments in the lab, we are united in our goal of better understanding primates. Our studies of nonhuman primates are of interest to scientists in many other disciplines ranging from entomology to sociology.