Prevalence of orofacial pain in individuals with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Gerodontology Pub Date : 2024-01-21 DOI:10.1111/ger.12740
Arthur C. Macedo, Fernando Valentim Bitencourt, André Oliveira Vilela de Faria, Isabella Harb Bizzi, Daniella de Freitas Pereira Ângelo Durço, Claudia Britto Azevedo, Martin Morris, Karen dos Santos Ferreira, Leonardo Cruz De Souza, Ana Miriam Velly
{"title":"Prevalence of orofacial pain in individuals with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Arthur C. Macedo,&nbsp;Fernando Valentim Bitencourt,&nbsp;André Oliveira Vilela de Faria,&nbsp;Isabella Harb Bizzi,&nbsp;Daniella de Freitas Pereira Ângelo Durço,&nbsp;Claudia Britto Azevedo,&nbsp;Martin Morris,&nbsp;Karen dos Santos Ferreira,&nbsp;Leonardo Cruz De Souza,&nbsp;Ana Miriam Velly","doi":"10.1111/ger.12740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>This systematic review investigated the prevalence of orofacial pain in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and methods</h3>\n \n <p>The search was conducted in five databases (Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL, Scopus and LILACS), in three grey literature sources and in included articles' reference lists. Three independent reviewers performed study selection, quality appraisal and data extraction. The risk of bias was assessed with the National Institutes of Health tool. Prevalence was calculated using the random-effects model. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were used to explore the heterogeneity of results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The database and grey literature search led to 12 246 results, from which nine studies were included; a further four were selected through citation searching. The total sample comprised 6115 patients with dementia and 84 with MCI. All studies had high risk of bias. The overall estimated pooled prevalence of orofacial pain among dementia participants was 19.0% (95% CI, 11.0%-27.0%; <i>I</i>\n <sup>2</sup>, 97.1%, <i>P</i> &lt; .001). Only one study included MCI participants, among which the prevalence of orofacial pain was 20.5%. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the different sources of diagnosis might explain the heterogeneity. A higher prevalence of orofacial pain was observed in dementia participants aged over 80 years or living in nursing homes. Meta-regression analysis showed a nonlinear relationship between age and the prevalence of orofacial pain.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The pooled data from the primary studies revealed that 2 out of 10 patients with dementia have orofacial pain. Further research is needed to clarify the magnitude in individuals with MCI.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12583,"journal":{"name":"Gerodontology","volume":"41 3","pages":"335-345"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ger.12740","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ger.12740","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This systematic review investigated the prevalence of orofacial pain in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia.

Materials and methods

The search was conducted in five databases (Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL, Scopus and LILACS), in three grey literature sources and in included articles' reference lists. Three independent reviewers performed study selection, quality appraisal and data extraction. The risk of bias was assessed with the National Institutes of Health tool. Prevalence was calculated using the random-effects model. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were used to explore the heterogeneity of results.

Results

The database and grey literature search led to 12 246 results, from which nine studies were included; a further four were selected through citation searching. The total sample comprised 6115 patients with dementia and 84 with MCI. All studies had high risk of bias. The overall estimated pooled prevalence of orofacial pain among dementia participants was 19.0% (95% CI, 11.0%-27.0%; I 2, 97.1%, P < .001). Only one study included MCI participants, among which the prevalence of orofacial pain was 20.5%. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the different sources of diagnosis might explain the heterogeneity. A higher prevalence of orofacial pain was observed in dementia participants aged over 80 years or living in nursing homes. Meta-regression analysis showed a nonlinear relationship between age and the prevalence of orofacial pain.

Conclusions

The pooled data from the primary studies revealed that 2 out of 10 patients with dementia have orofacial pain. Further research is needed to clarify the magnitude in individuals with MCI.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轻度认知障碍或痴呆症患者口面部疼痛的患病率:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
背景:本系统综述调查了轻度认知障碍(MCI)或痴呆患者口面部疼痛的患病率:在五个数据库(Medline (Ovid)、Embase (Ovid)、CINAHL、Scopus 和 LILACS)、三个灰色文献来源以及纳入文章的参考文献列表中进行了检索。三位独立审稿人对研究进行了筛选、质量评估和数据提取。偏倚风险采用美国国立卫生研究院工具进行评估。采用随机效应模型计算患病率。亚组分析和元回归用于探讨结果的异质性:通过数据库和灰色文献检索获得了 12 246 项结果,其中九项研究被纳入;另外四项研究是通过引用文献检索筛选出来的。总样本包括6115名痴呆症患者和84名MCI患者。所有研究的偏倚风险都很高。据估计,痴呆症患者口面部疼痛的总患病率为 19.0% (95% CI, 11.0%-27.0%; I2 , 97.1%, P 结论:来自主要研究的汇总数据显示,每10名痴呆症患者中就有2人患有口面部疼痛。要明确 MCI 患者口面部疼痛的程度,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gerodontology
Gerodontology 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Gerodontology is to improve the quality of life and oral health of older people. The boundaries of most conventional dental specialties must be repeatedly crossed to provide optimal dental care for older people. In addition, management of other health problems impacts on dental care and clinicians need knowledge in these numerous overlapping areas. Bringing together these diverse topics within one journal serves clinicians who are seeking to read and to publish papers across a broad spectrum of specialties. This journal provides the juxtaposition of papers from traditional specialties but which share this patient-centred interest, providing a synergy that serves progress in the subject of gerodontology.
期刊最新文献
Natural products for denture base disinfection: A scoping review. Validity of the Oral Hygiene Ability Instrument (OHAI). Dentists' perceptions of providing care to community-dwelling older people. Distribution of Australian dental practices in relation to residential aged care facilities: A geographic analysis. Mandibular third molar coronectomy in older adults and its effects on oral health-related quality of life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1