Delays in Obtaining Abortion and Miscarriage Care Among Pregnant Persons in New York State During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The CAP Study.

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2024-01-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/whr.2023.0128
Sarah Pickering, Meredith Manze, Jessie Losch, Diana Romero
{"title":"Delays in Obtaining Abortion and Miscarriage Care Among Pregnant Persons in New York State During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The CAP Study.","authors":"Sarah Pickering, Meredith Manze, Jessie Losch, Diana Romero","doi":"10.1089/whr.2023.0128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We sought to investigate delays obtaining abortion and miscarriage care during the COVID-19 pandemic, compared with before the pandemic, among pregnant persons in New York State (NYS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered a cross-sectional survey in June-July 2020 to NYS residents aged 18-44 years who identified as female or transgender male (<i>N</i> = 1,525). This analysis focused on a subsample who had an abortion or miscarriage during COVID-19, were seeking an abortion at the time of the survey, or had an abortion or miscarriage before COVID-19 (<i>n</i> = 116). We conducted bivariate analyses to determine differences in delays to seeking or obtaining an abortion or miscarriage during versus before the pandemic, as well as consideration of abortion among those pregnant during versus before the pandemic. We also asked open-ended questions about miscarriage and abortion experiences.</p><p><strong>Main findings: </strong>Of the 21 respondents who sought or were seeking an abortion during the COVID-19 pandemic, 76.2% (<i>n</i> = 16) reported experiencing a delay in obtaining abortion care, compared with 18.2% (<i>n</i> = 4) of those who experienced a delay before the pandemic (<i>p</i> < 0.001). A significantly higher proportion of respondents who were pregnant during the pandemic considered abortion, compared with those who gave birth before the pandemic (39.1% vs. 7.6%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Of the 39 respondents who miscarried during the pandemic, 35.9% (<i>n</i> = 14) delayed care, compared with 5.9% (<i>n</i> = 2) before the pandemic (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Some respondents also commented on the difficulty of accessing miscarriage services during COVID-19 in open-ended responses.</p><p><strong>Principal conclusions: </strong>Those who sought abortion or miscarriage care during the COVID-19 pandemic experienced significant delays in getting care. These are essential services that must be available during public health emergencies, and yet access to these services is now severely limited in many states due to the Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision.</p>","PeriodicalId":75329,"journal":{"name":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"5 1","pages":"30-39"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10797165/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/whr.2023.0128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We sought to investigate delays obtaining abortion and miscarriage care during the COVID-19 pandemic, compared with before the pandemic, among pregnant persons in New York State (NYS).

Methods: We administered a cross-sectional survey in June-July 2020 to NYS residents aged 18-44 years who identified as female or transgender male (N = 1,525). This analysis focused on a subsample who had an abortion or miscarriage during COVID-19, were seeking an abortion at the time of the survey, or had an abortion or miscarriage before COVID-19 (n = 116). We conducted bivariate analyses to determine differences in delays to seeking or obtaining an abortion or miscarriage during versus before the pandemic, as well as consideration of abortion among those pregnant during versus before the pandemic. We also asked open-ended questions about miscarriage and abortion experiences.

Main findings: Of the 21 respondents who sought or were seeking an abortion during the COVID-19 pandemic, 76.2% (n = 16) reported experiencing a delay in obtaining abortion care, compared with 18.2% (n = 4) of those who experienced a delay before the pandemic (p < 0.001). A significantly higher proportion of respondents who were pregnant during the pandemic considered abortion, compared with those who gave birth before the pandemic (39.1% vs. 7.6%; p < 0.001). Of the 39 respondents who miscarried during the pandemic, 35.9% (n = 14) delayed care, compared with 5.9% (n = 2) before the pandemic (p < 0.01). Some respondents also commented on the difficulty of accessing miscarriage services during COVID-19 in open-ended responses.

Principal conclusions: Those who sought abortion or miscarriage care during the COVID-19 pandemic experienced significant delays in getting care. These are essential services that must be available during public health emergencies, and yet access to these services is now severely limited in many states due to the Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 大流行期间纽约州孕妇在获得流产和流产护理方面的延误:CAP 研究。
背景:我们试图调查在 COVID-19 大流行期间与大流行之前相比,纽约州(NYS)孕妇获得堕胎和流产护理的延迟情况:我们于 2020 年 6 月至 7 月对纽约州 18-44 岁、自称女性或变性男性的居民(N = 1525)进行了横断面调查。本分析主要针对在 COVID-19 期间堕胎或流产、调查时正在寻求堕胎或在 COVID-19 之前堕胎或流产的子样本(n = 116)。我们进行了双变量分析,以确定大流行期间与大流行前寻求或获得人工流产或流产的延迟差异,以及大流行期间与大流行前怀孕者考虑人工流产的差异。我们还询问了有关流产和堕胎经历的开放式问题:在 COVID-19 大流行期间寻求或正在寻求堕胎的 21 名受访者中,76.2%(n = 16)报告称在获得堕胎护理方面经历了延误,而在大流行前经历延误的受访者中,18.2%(n = 4)报告称在获得堕胎护理方面经历了延误(p n = 14),而在大流行前,5.9%(n = 2)报告称在获得堕胎护理方面经历了延误(p 主要结论:在 COVID-19 大流行期间寻求堕胎或流产护理的人在获得护理方面经历了严重的延误。这些都是在公共卫生突发事件期间必须提供的基本服务,但由于多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案的判决,目前在许多州获得这些服务的机会受到严重限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Young Adults' Understanding of Modifiable Risk Factors of Infertility. Increased risks of Maternal Mental Health Conditions Following the COVID-19 Pandemic. Gut Akkermansia muciniphila, Prevotellaceae, and Enterobacteriaceae spp. as Possible Markers in Women-Related Nutritional and Clinical Trials: Familial Mediterranean Fever Disease. Impact of Illness Perception in Overweight and Obesity on Bio-Functional Age and Eating/Movement Behavior-A Follow-Up Study. Web-Based Development of Standard Operating Procedures and Midwifery Trainings at Ugandan Birth Clinic in the Framework of Implementing a Quality Improvement System for the MEWU-Midwife Exchange with Uganda.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1