In vitro Activity of Cefmetazole and Flomoxef among Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase producing Enterobacterales.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY New Microbiologica Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Koji Iio, Hideharu Hagiya, Tsukasa Higashionna, Fumio Otsuka
{"title":"In vitro Activity of Cefmetazole and Flomoxef among Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase producing Enterobacterales.","authors":"Koji Iio, Hideharu Hagiya, Tsukasa Higashionna, Fumio Otsuka","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this age of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), improving treatment using existing antibiotics is desirable. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) are high priority AMR pathogens according to the World Health Organization. Cephamycin-class beta- lactams are tolerant to hydrolysis by ESBL activity and have bactericidal effects on ESBL-E. The aim of the present study was to compare the in vitro minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of cefmetazole (CMZ) and flomoxef (FMOX) among ESBL-E strains. This was a retrospective study using microbiology laboratory data from Okayama University Hospital (Japan) from January 2014 to June 2022. The MIC was determined by broth microdilution method and the ESBL phenotypes were determined by double-disk method. Antimicrobial use density (AUD) data for CMZ and FMOX were also gathered. Annual proportions of ESBL-producing organisms in Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterobacter cloacae complex were 20.4-30.6%, 3.5-13.7%, and 0-3.1%, respectively. The ESBL-producing bacteria with MIC levels ≤1 μg/mL for CMZ and FMOX ranged from 57 to 84% and 97 to 100%, respectively, for E. coli, and from 50 to 92% and 80 to 100%, respectively, for K. pneumoniae. E. cloacae strains showed MIC levels ≥32 μg/mL for both agents. The AUD ratio for CMZ to FMOX ranged from 5.31 to 12.27, with no apparent upward or downward trend. Proportions of ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae strains with MIC ≤1 μg/mL were greater in FMOX than in CMZ. To corroborate the clinical superiority of FMOX in treating ESBL-E infections, a randomized controlled study, as well as pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis, is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":54723,"journal":{"name":"New Microbiologica","volume":"46 4","pages":"348-353"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Microbiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this age of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), improving treatment using existing antibiotics is desirable. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) are high priority AMR pathogens according to the World Health Organization. Cephamycin-class beta- lactams are tolerant to hydrolysis by ESBL activity and have bactericidal effects on ESBL-E. The aim of the present study was to compare the in vitro minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of cefmetazole (CMZ) and flomoxef (FMOX) among ESBL-E strains. This was a retrospective study using microbiology laboratory data from Okayama University Hospital (Japan) from January 2014 to June 2022. The MIC was determined by broth microdilution method and the ESBL phenotypes were determined by double-disk method. Antimicrobial use density (AUD) data for CMZ and FMOX were also gathered. Annual proportions of ESBL-producing organisms in Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterobacter cloacae complex were 20.4-30.6%, 3.5-13.7%, and 0-3.1%, respectively. The ESBL-producing bacteria with MIC levels ≤1 μg/mL for CMZ and FMOX ranged from 57 to 84% and 97 to 100%, respectively, for E. coli, and from 50 to 92% and 80 to 100%, respectively, for K. pneumoniae. E. cloacae strains showed MIC levels ≥32 μg/mL for both agents. The AUD ratio for CMZ to FMOX ranged from 5.31 to 12.27, with no apparent upward or downward trend. Proportions of ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae strains with MIC ≤1 μg/mL were greater in FMOX than in CMZ. To corroborate the clinical superiority of FMOX in treating ESBL-E infections, a randomized controlled study, as well as pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis, is required.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
头孢美唑和氟莫昔夫对产广谱β-内酰胺酶肠杆菌的体外活性
在抗菌药耐药性(AMR)日益严重的今天,人们希望利用现有抗生素改善治疗效果。世界卫生组织认为,产生广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)的肠杆菌属(ESBL-E)是AMR的重点病原体。头霉素类β-内酰胺耐受 ESBL 活性的水解,对 ESBL-E 具有杀菌作用。本研究旨在比较头孢美唑(CMZ)和氟莫西汀(FMOX)在ESBL-E菌株中的体外最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。这是一项回顾性研究,使用了冈山大学医院(日本)2014年1月至2022年6月的微生物实验室数据。MIC采用肉汤微量稀释法测定,ESBL表型采用双盘法测定。此外,还收集了 CMZ 和 FMOX 的抗菌药物使用密度 (AUD) 数据。在大肠埃希菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和复合泄殖腔肠杆菌中,产ESBL菌的年比例分别为20.4%-30.6%、3.5%-13.7%和0%-3.1%。对 CMZ 和 FMOX 的 MIC 含量≤1 μg/mL 的产 ESBL 细菌中,大肠杆菌的比例分别为 57% 至 84% 和 97% 至 100%,肺炎克雷伯菌的比例分别为 50% 至 92% 和 80% 至 100%。泄殖腔杆菌菌株对这两种制剂的 MIC 水平均≥32 μg/mL。CMZ 与 FMOX 的 AUD 比值从 5.31 到 12.27 不等,没有明显的上升或下降趋势。MIC≤1μg/mL的产ESBL大肠杆菌和肺炎双球菌菌株在FMOX中的比例高于CMZ。为了证实 FMOX 在治疗 ESBL-E 感染方面的临床优势,需要进行随机对照研究以及药代动力学/药效学分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Microbiologica
New Microbiologica 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The publication, diffusion and furtherance of research and study on all aspects of basic and clinical Microbiology and related fields are the chief aims of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of infection indicators and risk factors for influenza A after the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical Pharmacology of the Single Tablet Regimen Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in the evolving era of antiretroviral therapies. Comparison between rapid and laboratory serological tests in the context of the first responders during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak: are the two tests interchangeable? Critical insights into the ocular surface microbiome: the need to standardize. Epidemiological characteristics and related risk factors of mixed infection in children with mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1