Meta-Analysis of Demographic Disparities in Monkeypox Infections among Diverse Populations.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY New Microbiologica Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Mahmoud Kandeel
{"title":"Meta-Analysis of Demographic Disparities in Monkeypox Infections among Diverse Populations.","authors":"Mahmoud Kandeel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This meta-analysis aims to investigate demographic disparities in monkeypox (mpox) infections among various groups based on ethnicity, sexual partners, and gender. The study includes data from 2,646 to 4,002 patients across various outcomes. Among racial demographics, black populations show a lower odds ratio for mpox compared to white populations (OR=0.08 [0.01, 0.45], 95% CI, p=0.004). However, no statistically significant difference is found when comparing black populations with Hispanic or Asian populations (OR=0.72 [0.46, 1.11], p=0.13). There was a substantial disparity between gay, bisexual and other men-who-have-sex-with-men (GBMSM) and heterosexual populations, with significantly higher odds of mpox among the former (OR=393.80, 95% CI: [82.45, 180.85], p<0.00001). Analysis of sexual partners indicates a significant difference in infection risk between individuals with zero to one sexual partner and those with more than two partners (OR=0.06 [0.01, 0.28], p=0.0005). Additionally, there is a substantial difference in infection risk between male and female populations (OR=3868.02, p<0.00001). These findings emphasize the importance of considering demographic factors in understanding mpox transmission and risk profiles. Targeted research and intervention strategies are required to address the identified disparities and mitigate the spread of mpox.</p>","PeriodicalId":54723,"journal":{"name":"New Microbiologica","volume":"46 4","pages":"322-331"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Microbiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This meta-analysis aims to investigate demographic disparities in monkeypox (mpox) infections among various groups based on ethnicity, sexual partners, and gender. The study includes data from 2,646 to 4,002 patients across various outcomes. Among racial demographics, black populations show a lower odds ratio for mpox compared to white populations (OR=0.08 [0.01, 0.45], 95% CI, p=0.004). However, no statistically significant difference is found when comparing black populations with Hispanic or Asian populations (OR=0.72 [0.46, 1.11], p=0.13). There was a substantial disparity between gay, bisexual and other men-who-have-sex-with-men (GBMSM) and heterosexual populations, with significantly higher odds of mpox among the former (OR=393.80, 95% CI: [82.45, 180.85], p<0.00001). Analysis of sexual partners indicates a significant difference in infection risk between individuals with zero to one sexual partner and those with more than two partners (OR=0.06 [0.01, 0.28], p=0.0005). Additionally, there is a substantial difference in infection risk between male and female populations (OR=3868.02, p<0.00001). These findings emphasize the importance of considering demographic factors in understanding mpox transmission and risk profiles. Targeted research and intervention strategies are required to address the identified disparities and mitigate the spread of mpox.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同人群感染猴痘的人口统计学差异的 Meta 分析。
这项荟萃分析旨在根据种族、性伴侣和性别调查不同人群感染猴痘的人口统计学差异。研究包括来自 2646 到 4002 名患者的数据,涉及各种结果。在种族人口统计中,与白人相比,黑人感染水痘的几率较低(OR=0.08 [0.01, 0.45], 95% CI, p=0.004)。然而,将黑人与西班牙裔或亚裔人群进行比较,并没有发现有统计学意义的差异(OR=0.72 [0.46, 1.11],P=0.13)。男同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者(GBMSM)与异性恋人群之间存在巨大差异,前者患 mpox 的几率明显更高(OR=393.80,95% CI:[82.45, 180.85],p<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Microbiologica
New Microbiologica 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The publication, diffusion and furtherance of research and study on all aspects of basic and clinical Microbiology and related fields are the chief aims of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of infection indicators and risk factors for influenza A after the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical Pharmacology of the Single Tablet Regimen Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in the evolving era of antiretroviral therapies. Comparison between rapid and laboratory serological tests in the context of the first responders during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak: are the two tests interchangeable? Critical insights into the ocular surface microbiome: the need to standardize. Epidemiological characteristics and related risk factors of mixed infection in children with mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1