The characteristic of acute coronary syndromes of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease in centers with and without cardiac surgery on-site.

Cardiology journal Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-22 DOI:10.5603/cj.95152
Krzysztof Brust, Karol Śmiech, Kamil Bujak, Tomasz Roleder, Mariusz Gąsior
{"title":"The characteristic of acute coronary syndromes of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease in centers with and without cardiac surgery on-site.","authors":"Krzysztof Brust, Karol Śmiech, Kamil Bujak, Tomasz Roleder, Mariusz Gąsior","doi":"10.5603/cj.95152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multivessel disease (MVD) is diagnosed in a fair number of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). There are 36 cardiac-surgery (CS) centres and 157 catheterization laboratories dedicated to treat ACS in Poland. The aim of the study was to analyze MVD patient outcomes presented with ACS in centers with or without CS on-site.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study is a retrospective analysis (2017-2020) of MVD ACS patients (n = 4618) outcomes between those treated in centers with CS on site (n = 595) and those without CS (n = 4023).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in CS centers had a higher prevalence of renal failure (13.3% vs. 8.8%, p ≤ 0.001) and a more frequent history of coronary angioplasty - percutaneous coronary intervention (18.9% vs. 14.4%, p = 0.005). During the coronary angiography a femoral artery access was more often used in CS center patients (47.1% vs. 15.2%, p < 0.001). Percutaneous coronary intervention of MVD was more often performed in CS centers (74.6% vs. 71.0%, p = 0.054). In-hospital death (7.6% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.002), reinfarction (1.1% vs. 0.1%, p < 0.001), hemorrhagic complications (6.4% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001), recurrent target vessel revascularization (1.8% vs. 0.4%, p ≤ 0.001) and pulmonary edema (3.7% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001) occurred more often in CS centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The safety of ACS treatment in MVD patients in centers without CS on site is non-inferior to their treatment in centers with CS on site. Interestingly, there were more in-hospital adverse events observed in ACS MVD patients treated in centers with CS.</p>","PeriodicalId":93923,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11374331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/cj.95152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multivessel disease (MVD) is diagnosed in a fair number of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). There are 36 cardiac-surgery (CS) centres and 157 catheterization laboratories dedicated to treat ACS in Poland. The aim of the study was to analyze MVD patient outcomes presented with ACS in centers with or without CS on-site.

Methods: The present study is a retrospective analysis (2017-2020) of MVD ACS patients (n = 4618) outcomes between those treated in centers with CS on site (n = 595) and those without CS (n = 4023).

Results: Patients in CS centers had a higher prevalence of renal failure (13.3% vs. 8.8%, p ≤ 0.001) and a more frequent history of coronary angioplasty - percutaneous coronary intervention (18.9% vs. 14.4%, p = 0.005). During the coronary angiography a femoral artery access was more often used in CS center patients (47.1% vs. 15.2%, p < 0.001). Percutaneous coronary intervention of MVD was more often performed in CS centers (74.6% vs. 71.0%, p = 0.054). In-hospital death (7.6% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.002), reinfarction (1.1% vs. 0.1%, p < 0.001), hemorrhagic complications (6.4% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001), recurrent target vessel revascularization (1.8% vs. 0.4%, p ≤ 0.001) and pulmonary edema (3.7% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001) occurred more often in CS centers.

Conclusions: The safety of ACS treatment in MVD patients in centers without CS on site is non-inferior to their treatment in centers with CS on site. Interestingly, there were more in-hospital adverse events observed in ACS MVD patients treated in centers with CS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在有和没有心脏外科现场的中心,多支血管冠状动脉疾病患者急性冠状动脉综合征的特征。
背景:相当多的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者被诊断出患有多支血管疾病(MVD)。波兰有 36 家心脏外科(CS)中心和 157 家专门治疗 ACS 的导管室。本研究的目的是分析在有或没有心脏外科中心的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中 MVD 患者的治疗效果:本研究是一项回顾性分析(2017-2020 年),分析在有现场 CS 的中心(n = 595)和没有 CS 的中心(n = 4023)接受治疗的 MVD ACS 患者(n = 4618)的疗效:结果:CS中心的患者肾功能衰竭发生率更高(13.3%对8.8%,P≤0.001),冠状动脉血管成形术-经皮冠状动脉介入治疗史更频繁(18.9%对14.4%,P=0.005)。在冠状动脉造影过程中,CS中心的患者更常使用股动脉通路(47.1% 对 15.2%,P < 0.001)。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 MVD 更常在 CS 中心进行(74.6% 对 71.0%,P = 0.054)。CS中心更常发生院内死亡(7.6% vs. 4.6%,p = 0.002)、再梗死(1.1% vs. 0.1%,p < 0.001)、出血并发症(6.4% vs. 1.6%,p < 0.001)、复发性靶血管再通术(1.8% vs. 0.4%,p ≤ 0.001)和肺水肿(3.7% vs. 1.5%,p < 0.001):结论:在没有现场CS的中心,MVD患者ACS治疗的安全性并不比在有现场CS的中心差。有趣的是,在有CS的中心接受治疗的ACS MVD患者在院内发生的不良事件更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A real-life clinical application of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocarditis - one-center observational retrospective study. Cardiovascular sequelae in symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection survivors. Pregabalin and gabapentin-induced heart failure. A comparison of the management and five-year outcomes of patients treated for chronic coronary syndrome between 2006-2007 and 2015-2016 - insights from the PRESAGE registry. Effect of alcohol abuse on selected markers of inflammation, hemostasis, and endothelial function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1