Kant as a carpenter of reason: the highest good and systematic coherence

IF 0.8 2区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY British Journal for the History of Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1080/09608788.2023.2293882

Alexander T. Englert

引用次数: 0

Abstract

What is the highest good actually good for in Kant’s third Critique? While there are well-worked out answers to this question in the literature that focus on the highest good’s practical importance...

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

作为理性木匠的康德：至善与系统一致性

在康德的《第三次批判》中，至善究竟是为了什么？虽然文献中对这一问题的回答都是围绕着最高善的实践重要性而展开的......

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

British Journal for the History of Philosophy PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

16.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： BJHP publishes articles and reviews on the history of philosophy and related intellectual history from the ancient world to the end of the 20th Century. The journal is designed to foster understanding of the history of philosophy through studying the texts of past philosophers in the context - intellectual, political and social - in which the text was created. Although focusing on the recognized classics, a feature of the journal is to give attention to less major figures and to disciplines other than philosophy which impinge on the history of philosophy including political theory, religion and the natural sciences in so far as they illuminate the history of philosophy.

期刊最新文献

Peter of Mantua and the ‘piecemeal’ conception of substantial change* A taxonomy of divisibilism and Gregory of Rimini’s place Helen Knight and Margaret Macdonald on the meaning of ‘good’ Du Châtelet's causal idealism A resolute reading of Iris Murdoch’s Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals