The effect of capital structure on the financial sustainability of microfinance institutions: A meta-analysis

IF 2 4区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Review of Development Economics Pub Date : 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1111/rode.13088
Muleye Tarekegn Dirse, Gurudutta P. Japee
{"title":"The effect of capital structure on the financial sustainability of microfinance institutions: A meta-analysis","authors":"Muleye Tarekegn Dirse, Gurudutta P. Japee","doi":"10.1111/rode.13088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Considering the trend toward microfinance institutions (MFIs) commercialization that fundamentally reshapes their capital structure, this meta-analysis, by synthesizing data from a wide range of studies, aims to investigate the impact of different sources of finance on the financial sustainability of MFIs and determine the optimal order in which these sources should be utilized. In this study, 166 effect sizes were obtained from 64 studies. Overall, the findings indicate that equity and deposit financing enhance financial sustainability positively, whereas debt and donation financing exhibit an inverse relationship. However, variations exist based on the MFI charters. While equity financing adversely affects the financial sustainability of MFI banks, it also exerts positive effects on other types of MFIs. Similarly, deposit financing negatively affected MFI NGOs. Regarding financial sustainability proxies, debt and equity financing affect financial self-sufficiency (FSS) and operating self-sufficiency (OSS), unlike donation and deposit financing. Equity financing has a positive effect on OSS but a negative effect on FSS. In contrast, debt financing shows the opposite trend. The meta-regression further reveals that, as capital structure variables, the sources of finance do not significantly explain the variance in MFIs' FSS but do so for OSS. These findings have implications for managers and for future research.","PeriodicalId":47635,"journal":{"name":"Review of Development Economics","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Development Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.13088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considering the trend toward microfinance institutions (MFIs) commercialization that fundamentally reshapes their capital structure, this meta-analysis, by synthesizing data from a wide range of studies, aims to investigate the impact of different sources of finance on the financial sustainability of MFIs and determine the optimal order in which these sources should be utilized. In this study, 166 effect sizes were obtained from 64 studies. Overall, the findings indicate that equity and deposit financing enhance financial sustainability positively, whereas debt and donation financing exhibit an inverse relationship. However, variations exist based on the MFI charters. While equity financing adversely affects the financial sustainability of MFI banks, it also exerts positive effects on other types of MFIs. Similarly, deposit financing negatively affected MFI NGOs. Regarding financial sustainability proxies, debt and equity financing affect financial self-sufficiency (FSS) and operating self-sufficiency (OSS), unlike donation and deposit financing. Equity financing has a positive effect on OSS but a negative effect on FSS. In contrast, debt financing shows the opposite trend. The meta-regression further reveals that, as capital structure variables, the sources of finance do not significantly explain the variance in MFIs' FSS but do so for OSS. These findings have implications for managers and for future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
资本结构对小额信贷机构财务可持续性的影响:元分析
考虑到小额信贷机构(MFIs)商业化的趋势从根本上重塑了其资本结构,本元分析通过综合大量研究数据,旨在调查不同资金来源对小额信贷机构财务可持续性的影响,并确定利用这些资金来源的最佳顺序。在这项研究中,从 64 项研究中获得了 166 个效应大小。总体而言,研究结果表明,股权和存款融资对财务可持续性有积极的促进作用,而债务和捐赠融资则表现出反向关系。不过,小额金融机构的章程也存在差异。虽然股权融资对小额贷款机构银行的财务可持续性产生了不利影响,但对其他类型的小额贷款机构也产生了积极影响。同样,存款融资也对小额金融机构非政府组织产生负面影响。在财务可持续性替代指标方面,与捐赠和存款融资不同,债务和股权融资会影响财务自给自足(FSS)和运营自给自足(OSS)。股权融资对运营自给自足有积极影响,但对财务自给自足有消极影响。相比之下,债务融资则呈现相反的趋势。元回归进一步显示,作为资本结构变量,融资来源不能显著解释小额金融机构的财务自给率差异,但却能解释经营自给率差异。这些研究结果对管理者和未来的研究具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: The Review of Development Economics is a leading journal publishing high-quality research in development economics. It publishes rigorous analytical papers, theoretical and empirical, which deal with contemporary growth problems of developing countries, including the transition economies. The Review not only serves as a link between theorists and practitioners, but also builds a bridge between development economists and their colleagues in related fields. While the level of the Review of Development Economics is academic, the materials presented are of value to policy makers and researchers, especially those in developing countries.
期刊最新文献
From non‐renewables to renewables and high‐tech production: The impact of natural wealth and technology on ecological load capacity in sub‐Saharan Africa Health expenditure, and economic growth in Sub‐Saharan African countries: The role of governance quality Gendered distributional impacts of ownership of mobile money account on farm input expenditures: A micro perspective from rural maize farmers in Ghana The impact of financial inclusion on rural–urban households welfare inequality in Ghana: A decomposition analysis Nutrition for all? Input subsidies and equitable diets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1