Ant protection effectiveness in myrmecophytes and extrafloral nectary plants

IF 1.9 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY Journal of Zoology Pub Date : 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1111/jzo.13144
L. S. Souza, E. S. Calixto, S. S. Domingos, A. Bächtold, E. Alves-Silva
{"title":"Ant protection effectiveness in myrmecophytes and extrafloral nectary plants","authors":"L. S. Souza,&nbsp;E. S. Calixto,&nbsp;S. S. Domingos,&nbsp;A. Bächtold,&nbsp;E. Alves-Silva","doi":"10.1111/jzo.13144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Extrafloral nectaried plants and myrmecophytes offer resources to ants that engage in protective mutualisms. The role of different ant species in herbivore deterrence has long been analyzed by using insect baits, and ants are regarded as effective plant guards if they attack the insects. Here, by performing a literature review, we conducted a comparative investigation on which ants display aggression toward experimental prey, which ants are better plant guards, and which plants (extrafloral nectaried plants or myrmecophytes) are better defended by ants. Data revealed that studies evaluating ant aggression toward insect baits have been performed on 37 extrafloral nectaried plant species and 19 myrmecophytes, and have involved over 30 genera of ants. Extrafloral nectaried plants and myrmecophytes rely on specific ant fauna to defend them from herbivores. In extrafloral nectaried plants, <i>Camponotus</i> and <i>Crematogaster</i> were regarded as the best plant protectors, as they attacked insects in nearly all plants. In myrmecophytes, <i>Azteca</i>, <i>Pheidole</i>, and <i>Pseudomyrmex</i> were the most important insect attackers. Myrmecophytes were better protected by ants, as all insects were attacked; in extrafloral nectaried plants, some ants failed to attack the insects. Plants are patrolled by several different ants, but there is a core of ants that excel in protection, and this varies according to plant type (extrafloral nectaried plants and myrmecophytes). With this knowledge, it may be possible to label different ants as effective plant guards, to anticipate their effects on plant performance, and even to understand their potential role as biological control agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":17600,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zoology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jzo.13144","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extrafloral nectaried plants and myrmecophytes offer resources to ants that engage in protective mutualisms. The role of different ant species in herbivore deterrence has long been analyzed by using insect baits, and ants are regarded as effective plant guards if they attack the insects. Here, by performing a literature review, we conducted a comparative investigation on which ants display aggression toward experimental prey, which ants are better plant guards, and which plants (extrafloral nectaried plants or myrmecophytes) are better defended by ants. Data revealed that studies evaluating ant aggression toward insect baits have been performed on 37 extrafloral nectaried plant species and 19 myrmecophytes, and have involved over 30 genera of ants. Extrafloral nectaried plants and myrmecophytes rely on specific ant fauna to defend them from herbivores. In extrafloral nectaried plants, Camponotus and Crematogaster were regarded as the best plant protectors, as they attacked insects in nearly all plants. In myrmecophytes, Azteca, Pheidole, and Pseudomyrmex were the most important insect attackers. Myrmecophytes were better protected by ants, as all insects were attacked; in extrafloral nectaried plants, some ants failed to attack the insects. Plants are patrolled by several different ants, but there is a core of ants that excel in protection, and this varies according to plant type (extrafloral nectaried plants and myrmecophytes). With this knowledge, it may be possible to label different ants as effective plant guards, to anticipate their effects on plant performance, and even to understand their potential role as biological control agents.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蜜腺植物和花外蜜源植物的防蚁效果
花外蜜源植物和绵羊科植物为蚂蚁提供了资源,而蚂蚁则参与保护性互惠关系。长期以来,人们一直利用昆虫诱饵分析不同种类的蚂蚁在食草动物威慑中的作用,如果蚂蚁攻击昆虫,就会被认为是有效的植物卫士。在此,我们通过文献综述,对哪些蚂蚁对实验性猎物表现出攻击性、哪些蚂蚁是更好的植物卫士以及哪些植物(花外蜜源植物或麦角植物)更受蚂蚁的保护进行了比较调查。数据显示,评估蚂蚁对昆虫诱饵的攻击性的研究已在 37 种花蜜源外植物和 19 种甲壳纲植物上进行,涉及 30 多个蚂蚁属。花蜜外植物和绵羊科植物依靠特定的蚂蚁群来抵御食草动物。在花蜜外植物中,Camponotus 和 Crematogaster 被认为是最好的植物保护者,因为它们几乎能攻击所有植物中的昆虫。在糠秕类植物中,Azteca、Pheidole 和 Pseudomyrmex 是最重要的昆虫攻击者。蚂蚁能更好地保护肉质植物,因为所有昆虫都会受到攻击;在花外蜜源植物中,一些蚂蚁未能攻击昆虫。植物由几种不同的蚂蚁巡逻,但有一种核心蚂蚁的保护能力很强,而且根据植物类型(花外蜜源植物和麦杆植物)的不同而不同。有了这些知识,就有可能给不同的蚂蚁贴上有效保护植物的标签,预测它们对植物性能的影响,甚至了解它们作为生物控制剂的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Zoology
Journal of Zoology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Zoology publishes high-quality research papers that are original and are of broad interest. The Editors seek studies that are hypothesis-driven and interdisciplinary in nature. Papers on animal behaviour, ecology, physiology, anatomy, developmental biology, evolution, systematics, genetics and genomics will be considered; research that explores the interface between these disciplines is strongly encouraged. Studies dealing with geographically and/or taxonomically restricted topics should test general hypotheses, describe novel findings or have broad implications. The Journal of Zoology aims to maintain an effective but fair peer-review process that recognises research quality as a combination of the relevance, approach and execution of a research study.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Reproductive health from hair: Validation and utility of hair progesterone analysis in the Asian black bear, Ursus thibetanus Multimodal courtship communication in a wolf spider Exploring resource patch occupancy: patch size, but not connectivity, explains the abundance of spider kleptoparasites in golden orb webs Lodge‐building in rodents: relationships with ecological and natural history factors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1