Facets of Trust and Distrust in Collaborative Robots at the Workplace: Towards a Multidimensional and Relational Conceptualisation

IF 3.8 2区 计算机科学 Q2 ROBOTICS International Journal of Social Robotics Pub Date : 2024-01-22 DOI:10.1007/s12369-023-01082-1
Tobias Kopp
{"title":"Facets of Trust and Distrust in Collaborative Robots at the Workplace: Towards a Multidimensional and Relational Conceptualisation","authors":"Tobias Kopp","doi":"10.1007/s12369-023-01082-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The relevance of trust on the road to successful human-robot interaction is widely acknowledged. Thereby, trust is commonly understood as a monolithic concept characterising dyadic relations between a human and a robot. However, this conceptualisation seems oversimplified and neglects the specific interaction context. In a multidisciplinary approach, this conceptual analysis synthesizes sociological notions of trust and distrust, psychological trust models, and ideas of philosophers of technology in order to pave the way for a multidimensional, relational and context-sensitive conceptualisation of human-robot trust and distrust. In this vein, trust is characterised functionally as a mechanism to cope with environmental complexity when dealing with ambiguously perceived hybrid robots such as collaborative robots, which enable human-robot interactions without physical separation in the workplace context. Common definitions of trust in the HRI context emphasise that trust is based on concrete expectations regarding individual goals. Therefore, I propose a three-dimensional notion of trust that binds trust to a reference object and accounts for various coexisting goals at the workplace. Furthermore, the assumption that robots represent trustees in a narrower sense is challenged by unfolding influential relational networks of trust within the organisational context. In terms of practical implications, trust is distinguished from acceptance and actual technology usage, which may be promoted by trust, but are strongly influenced by contextual moderating factors. In addition, theoretical arguments for considering distrust not only as the opposite of trust, but as an alternative and coexisting complexity reduction mechanism are outlined. Finally, the article presents key conclusions and future research avenues.</p>","PeriodicalId":14361,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Robotics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Robotics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-01082-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ROBOTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relevance of trust on the road to successful human-robot interaction is widely acknowledged. Thereby, trust is commonly understood as a monolithic concept characterising dyadic relations between a human and a robot. However, this conceptualisation seems oversimplified and neglects the specific interaction context. In a multidisciplinary approach, this conceptual analysis synthesizes sociological notions of trust and distrust, psychological trust models, and ideas of philosophers of technology in order to pave the way for a multidimensional, relational and context-sensitive conceptualisation of human-robot trust and distrust. In this vein, trust is characterised functionally as a mechanism to cope with environmental complexity when dealing with ambiguously perceived hybrid robots such as collaborative robots, which enable human-robot interactions without physical separation in the workplace context. Common definitions of trust in the HRI context emphasise that trust is based on concrete expectations regarding individual goals. Therefore, I propose a three-dimensional notion of trust that binds trust to a reference object and accounts for various coexisting goals at the workplace. Furthermore, the assumption that robots represent trustees in a narrower sense is challenged by unfolding influential relational networks of trust within the organisational context. In terms of practical implications, trust is distinguished from acceptance and actual technology usage, which may be promoted by trust, but are strongly influenced by contextual moderating factors. In addition, theoretical arguments for considering distrust not only as the opposite of trust, but as an alternative and coexisting complexity reduction mechanism are outlined. Finally, the article presents key conclusions and future research avenues.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作场所协作机器人的信任和不信任面面观:实现多维和关系概念化
信任对于人与机器人成功互动的重要性已得到广泛认可。因此,信任通常被理解为一个单一的概念,是人与机器人之间二元关系的特征。然而,这一概念似乎过于简单化,忽略了具体的交互环境。本概念分析采用多学科方法,综合了社会学中的信任和不信任概念、心理学中的信任模型以及技术哲学家的观点,从而为人类与机器人之间信任和不信任的多维、关系和情境概念化铺平道路。在这一思路下,信任被描述为一种功能性机制,在处理协作机器人等感知模糊的混合机器人时可应对环境的复杂性。人机交互背景下信任的常见定义强调,信任是基于对个人目标的具体期望。因此,我提出了一个三维信任概念,将信任与参考对象结合起来,并考虑到工作场所中各种共存的目标。此外,机器人代表狭义上的受信任者这一假设也受到了挑战,因为在组织环境中,有影响力的信任关系网络正在展开。就实际意义而言,信任与接受和实际技术使用是有区别的,后者可能会受到信任的促进,但也受到环境调节因素的强烈影响。此外,文章还从理论上论证了不信任不仅是信任的对立面,也是一种替代性的、共存的复杂性降低机制。最后,文章提出了主要结论和未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
8.50%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Social Robotics is the study of robots that are able to interact and communicate among themselves, with humans, and with the environment, within the social and cultural structure attached to its role. The journal covers a broad spectrum of topics related to the latest technologies, new research results and developments in the area of social robotics on all levels, from developments in core enabling technologies to system integration, aesthetic design, applications and social implications. It provides a platform for like-minded researchers to present their findings and latest developments in social robotics, covering relevant advances in engineering, computing, arts and social sciences. The journal publishes original, peer reviewed articles and contributions on innovative ideas and concepts, new discoveries and improvements, as well as novel applications, by leading researchers and developers regarding the latest fundamental advances in the core technologies that form the backbone of social robotics, distinguished developmental projects in the area, as well as seminal works in aesthetic design, ethics and philosophy, studies on social impact and influence, pertaining to social robotics.
期刊最新文献
Time-to-Collision Based Social Force Model for Intelligent Agents on Shared Public Spaces Investigation of Joint Action in Go/No-Go Tasks: Development of a Human-Like Eye Robot and Verification of Action Space How Non-experts Kinesthetically Teach a Robot over Multiple Sessions: Diversity in Teaching Styles and Effects on Performance The Child Factor in Child–Robot Interaction: Discovering the Impact of Developmental Stage and Individual Characteristics Is the Robot Spying on me? A Study on Perceived Privacy in Telepresence Scenarios in a Care Setting with Mobile and Humanoid Robots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1