Hand hygiene compliance in a Brazilian COVID-19 unit: the impact of moments and contact precautions

Marília Duarte Valim, Jéssica Regina Rossetto, Juliano Bortolini, Loreen Herwaldt
{"title":"Hand hygiene compliance in a Brazilian COVID-19 unit: the impact of moments and contact precautions","authors":"Marília Duarte Valim, Jéssica Regina Rossetto, Juliano Bortolini, Loreen Herwaldt","doi":"10.1186/s13756-023-01356-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Healthcare-associated infections are among the most common complications during hospitalization. These infections increase morbidity and mortality and they increase length of hospital stay and the cost of healthcare. The aims of our study were to monitor hand hygiene (HH) compliance, HH technique quality and factors related to HH practice among health professionals in a COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit (ICU). An observational, prospective study. Between September and December 2021, we observed 69 healthcare professionals in an eight-bed ICU for patients with COVID-19 in midwestern Brazil. We used the WHO observation form to collect data. The dependent variable was HH compliance and independent variables were professional category, sex, HH quality (3-step technique for at least 15 s), number of HH opportunities observed, observation shift and inappropriate glove use. We observed 1185 HH opportunities. The overall compliance rate was 26.4%, but only 6.5% were performed with the correct 3-step technique for the minimum time. HH compliance was considerably lower for moments “before” tasks (6.7%; 95% CI 4.8%, 9.2%) compared with moments “after” tasks (43.8%; 95% CI 39.9%, 47.8%). The logistic model found that inappropriate glove use, night shift and physicians (p < 0.001) were associated with low HH compliance. The infrastructure analysis found that the unit had an insufficient number of alcohol-based handrub (ABHR) dispensers at the point of care and that the mechanism for activating them was poorly designed. HH compliance was very low. Inappropriate glove use was associated with low compliance and the unit’s infrastructure did not support good HH practice. The fact that healthcare professionals were more likely to do HH after tasks, suggests that they use HH to protect themselves rather than the patients. Adequate infrastructure and ongoing health education with a focus on HH while caring for patients in contact precautions are essential for improving HH compliance and patient safety.","PeriodicalId":501612,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01356-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Healthcare-associated infections are among the most common complications during hospitalization. These infections increase morbidity and mortality and they increase length of hospital stay and the cost of healthcare. The aims of our study were to monitor hand hygiene (HH) compliance, HH technique quality and factors related to HH practice among health professionals in a COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit (ICU). An observational, prospective study. Between September and December 2021, we observed 69 healthcare professionals in an eight-bed ICU for patients with COVID-19 in midwestern Brazil. We used the WHO observation form to collect data. The dependent variable was HH compliance and independent variables were professional category, sex, HH quality (3-step technique for at least 15 s), number of HH opportunities observed, observation shift and inappropriate glove use. We observed 1185 HH opportunities. The overall compliance rate was 26.4%, but only 6.5% were performed with the correct 3-step technique for the minimum time. HH compliance was considerably lower for moments “before” tasks (6.7%; 95% CI 4.8%, 9.2%) compared with moments “after” tasks (43.8%; 95% CI 39.9%, 47.8%). The logistic model found that inappropriate glove use, night shift and physicians (p < 0.001) were associated with low HH compliance. The infrastructure analysis found that the unit had an insufficient number of alcohol-based handrub (ABHR) dispensers at the point of care and that the mechanism for activating them was poorly designed. HH compliance was very low. Inappropriate glove use was associated with low compliance and the unit’s infrastructure did not support good HH practice. The fact that healthcare professionals were more likely to do HH after tasks, suggests that they use HH to protect themselves rather than the patients. Adequate infrastructure and ongoing health education with a focus on HH while caring for patients in contact precautions are essential for improving HH compliance and patient safety.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西 COVID-19 单位的手卫生遵守情况:时刻和接触预防措施的影响
医疗相关感染是住院期间最常见的并发症之一。这些感染会增加发病率和死亡率,并延长住院时间和增加医疗成本。我们的研究旨在监测 COVID-19 重症监护病房(ICU)中医护人员的手卫生(HH)依从性、手卫生技术质量以及与手卫生实践相关的因素。这是一项前瞻性观察研究。2021 年 9 月至 12 月期间,我们对巴西中西部地区一家拥有 8 张床位的重症监护病房的 69 名医护人员进行了观察,该病房收治了 COVID-19 患者。我们使用世界卫生组织的观察表收集数据。因变量为HH依从性,自变量为专业类别、性别、HH质量(至少15秒的3步技术)、观察到的HH机会数、观察班次和手套使用不当。我们观察了 1185 次 HH 机会。总体符合率为 26.4%,但只有 6.5%在最短时间内采用了正确的三步操作法。与任务 "完成后 "的时间段(43.8%;95% CI 39.9%,47.8%)相比,任务 "完成前 "的时间段(6.7%;95% CI 4.8%,9.2%)的HH合规率要低得多。逻辑模型发现,手套使用不当、夜班和医生(p < 0.001)与 HH 合规性低有关。基础设施分析发现,该病房在护理点配备的酒精搓手液(ABHR)分配器数量不足,且启动机制设计不当。洗手依从性非常低。手套使用不当与依从性低有关,而病房的基础设施也不支持良好的洗手方法。事实上,医护人员更有可能在完成任务后使用健康手套,这表明他们使用健康手套是为了保护自己而不是病人。充足的基础设施和持续的健康教育,重点是在护理患者时采取接触预防措施,这对提高HH的依从性和患者安全至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Should my child be given antibiotics? A systematic review of parental decision making in rural and remote locations Pharmacies and use of antibiotics: a cross sectional study in 19 Arab countries Assessing infection prevention and control structures in German hospitals after the COVID-19 pandemic using the WHO infection prevention and control assessment framework (IPCAF): results from 660 hospitals and comparison with a pre-pandemic survey One decade of point-prevalence surveys for carriage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing enterobacterales: whole genome sequencing based prevalence and genetic characterization in a large Dutch teaching hospital from 2013 to 2022 Surveillance of antimicrobial utilization in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prescription rates, indications, and quality of use from point prevalence surveys
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1