An Electronic Health Record Alert for Inpatient Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccinations Increases Vaccination Ordering and Uncovers Workflow Inefficiencies.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-22 DOI:10.1055/a-2250-6305
Kameron Collin Black, Nicole Ashley Snyder, Mengyu Zhou, Zhen Zhu, Colby Uptegraft, Ani Chintalapani, Benjamin Orwoll
{"title":"An Electronic Health Record Alert for Inpatient Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccinations Increases Vaccination Ordering and Uncovers Workflow Inefficiencies.","authors":"Kameron Collin Black, Nicole Ashley Snyder, Mengyu Zhou, Zhen Zhu, Colby Uptegraft, Ani Chintalapani, Benjamin Orwoll","doi":"10.1055/a-2250-6305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Despite mortality benefits, only 19.9% of U.S. adults are fully vaccinated against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The inpatient setting is an opportune environment to update vaccinations, and inpatient electronic health record (EHR) alerts have been shown to increase vaccination rates.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong> Our objective was to evaluate whether an EHR alert could increase COVID-19 vaccinations in eligible hospitalized adults by prompting providers to order the vaccine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This was a quasiexperimental pre-post-interventional design study at an academic and community hospital in the western United States between 1 January, 2021 and 31 October, 2021. Inclusion criteria were unvaccinated hospitalized adults. A soft-stop, interruptive EHR alert prompted providers to order COVID-19 vaccines for those with an expected discharge date within 48 hours and interest in vaccination. The outcome measured was the proportion of all eligible patients for whom vaccines were ordered and administered before and after alert implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Vaccine ordering rates increased from 4.0 to 13.0% at the academic hospital (odds ratio [OR]: 4.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.39-4.74, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and from 7.4 to 11.6% at the community hospital (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.23-2.13, <i>p</i> < 0.001) after alert implementation. Administration increased postalert from 3.6 to 12.7% at the academic hospital (OR: 3.21, 95% CI: 2.70-3.82, <i>p</i> < 0.001) but was unchanged at the community hospital, 6.7 to 6.7% (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.73-1.37, <i>p</i> = 0.994). Further analysis revealed infrequent vaccine availability at the community hospital.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Vaccine ordering rates improved at both sites after alert implementation. Vaccine administration rates, however, only improved at the academic hospital, likely due in part to vaccine dispensation inefficiency at the community hospital. This study demonstrates the potential impact of complex workflow patterns on new EHR alert success and provides a rationale for subsequent qualitative workflow analysis with alert implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10917607/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2250-6305","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Despite mortality benefits, only 19.9% of U.S. adults are fully vaccinated against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The inpatient setting is an opportune environment to update vaccinations, and inpatient electronic health record (EHR) alerts have been shown to increase vaccination rates.

Objective:  Our objective was to evaluate whether an EHR alert could increase COVID-19 vaccinations in eligible hospitalized adults by prompting providers to order the vaccine.

Methods:  This was a quasiexperimental pre-post-interventional design study at an academic and community hospital in the western United States between 1 January, 2021 and 31 October, 2021. Inclusion criteria were unvaccinated hospitalized adults. A soft-stop, interruptive EHR alert prompted providers to order COVID-19 vaccines for those with an expected discharge date within 48 hours and interest in vaccination. The outcome measured was the proportion of all eligible patients for whom vaccines were ordered and administered before and after alert implementation.

Results:  Vaccine ordering rates increased from 4.0 to 13.0% at the academic hospital (odds ratio [OR]: 4.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.39-4.74, p < 0.001) and from 7.4 to 11.6% at the community hospital (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.23-2.13, p < 0.001) after alert implementation. Administration increased postalert from 3.6 to 12.7% at the academic hospital (OR: 3.21, 95% CI: 2.70-3.82, p < 0.001) but was unchanged at the community hospital, 6.7 to 6.7% (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.73-1.37, p = 0.994). Further analysis revealed infrequent vaccine availability at the community hospital.

Conclusion:  Vaccine ordering rates improved at both sites after alert implementation. Vaccine administration rates, however, only improved at the academic hospital, likely due in part to vaccine dispensation inefficiency at the community hospital. This study demonstrates the potential impact of complex workflow patterns on new EHR alert success and provides a rationale for subsequent qualitative workflow analysis with alert implementation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院病人 COVID-19 疫苗接种的电子病历提醒可提高疫苗接种的订购率,并发现工作流程中的低效之处。
背景:尽管对死亡率有好处,但只有 19.9% 的美国成年人接种了 2019 年冠状病毒病 (COVID-19) 疫苗。住院环境是更新疫苗接种的有利时机,住院病人电子健康记录(EHR)警报已被证明可提高疫苗接种率:评估电子病历警报是否能通过促使医疗服务提供者订购疫苗来增加符合条件的住院成人的 COVID-19 疫苗接种率:这是在 2021 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 10 月 31 日期间,在美国西部的一家学术和社区医院进行的一项前-后干预设计的准实验性研究。纳入标准为未接种疫苗的住院成年人。通过软停止、中断式电子病历提醒,促使医疗服务提供者为预计出院日期在 48 小时内且有意接种疫苗的患者订购 COVID-19 疫苗。测量的结果是预警实施前后所有符合条件的患者中订购和接种疫苗的比例:预警实施后,学术医院的疫苗接种率从 4.0% 上升至 13.0%(OR 4.01,95% CI 3.39 至 4.74,p < 0.001),社区医院的疫苗接种率从 7.4% 上升至 11.6%(OR 1.62,95% CI 1.23 至 2.13,p < 0.001)。预警后,学术医院的接种率从 3.6% 上升至 12.7%(OR 3.21,95% CI 2.70 至 3.82,p < 0.001),但社区医院的接种率没有变化,仍为 6.7% 至 6.7%(OR 0.99,95% CI 0.73 至 1.37,p = 0.994)。进一步分析表明,社区医院的疫苗供应并不频繁:结论:实施预警后,两家医院的疫苗接种率都有所提高。结论:实施预警后,两家医院的疫苗接种率都有所提高,但只有学术医院的疫苗接种率有所提高,部分原因可能是社区医院的疫苗分发效率较低。这项研究证明了复杂的工作流程模式对新电子病历警报成功与否的潜在影响,并为后续实施警报的定性工作流程分析提供了理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
期刊最新文献
Interventions to mitigate EHR and documentation burden in health professions trainees: A scoping review. A human-centered approach for designing a social care referral platform. Ethical dimensions of clinical data sharing by US healthcare organizations for purposes beyond direct patient care: Interviews with healthcare leaders. Special Issue on Informatics Education A Longitudinal Graduate Medical Education Curriculum in Clinical Informatics: Function, Structure, and Evaluation. Communication Challenges Experienced by Clinicians and Patients During Teleconsultation. Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1