Can't stop, won't stop - understanding anxiety's role in cyberchondria among pregnant women.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Women & Health Pub Date : 2024-02-07 Epub Date: 2024-01-30 DOI:10.1080/03630242.2024.2308525
Matea Šoštarić, Nataša Jokić-Begić, Matea Vukušić Mijačika
{"title":"Can't stop, won't stop - understanding anxiety's role in cyberchondria among pregnant women.","authors":"Matea Šoštarić, Nataša Jokić-Begić, Matea Vukušić Mijačika","doi":"10.1080/03630242.2024.2308525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Online health research is common during pregnancy, especially if women are facing complications. Given the unpleasant emotions women experience after research, it is surprising that cyberchondria, excessive and repeated online health research caused by anxiety that intensifies such anxiety, has not been studied in pregnant women. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the predictors of cyberchondria among women with and without pregnancy complications, accounting for health anxiety (a worry regarding personal health) and pregnancy-specific anxiety (concerns related to pregnancy and childbirth). A total of 360 pregnant women completed a questionnaire consisted of Short Health Anxiety Inventory, Pregnancy Concerns Scale and Short Cyberchondria Scale. The results of one-way MANOVA showed that women who had medically complicated pregnancy had higher levels of health anxiety, pregnancy-specific anxiety and cyberchondria compared to those without complications. A hierarchical multiple regression analysis showed that health anxiety and pregnancy-specific anxiety were predictors of cyberchondria but had different roles depending on complications. Pregnancy-specific anxiety predicted cyberchondria in both groups above health anxiety. Health anxiety predicted cyberchondria only in women without complications. In conclusion, women with complications have a higher chance of experiencing cyberchondria. Pregnancy-specific and health anxiety are risk factors for cyberchondria in pregnant women.</p>","PeriodicalId":23972,"journal":{"name":"Women & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2024.2308525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online health research is common during pregnancy, especially if women are facing complications. Given the unpleasant emotions women experience after research, it is surprising that cyberchondria, excessive and repeated online health research caused by anxiety that intensifies such anxiety, has not been studied in pregnant women. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the predictors of cyberchondria among women with and without pregnancy complications, accounting for health anxiety (a worry regarding personal health) and pregnancy-specific anxiety (concerns related to pregnancy and childbirth). A total of 360 pregnant women completed a questionnaire consisted of Short Health Anxiety Inventory, Pregnancy Concerns Scale and Short Cyberchondria Scale. The results of one-way MANOVA showed that women who had medically complicated pregnancy had higher levels of health anxiety, pregnancy-specific anxiety and cyberchondria compared to those without complications. A hierarchical multiple regression analysis showed that health anxiety and pregnancy-specific anxiety were predictors of cyberchondria but had different roles depending on complications. Pregnancy-specific anxiety predicted cyberchondria in both groups above health anxiety. Health anxiety predicted cyberchondria only in women without complications. In conclusion, women with complications have a higher chance of experiencing cyberchondria. Pregnancy-specific and health anxiety are risk factors for cyberchondria in pregnant women.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
停不下来,停不下来--了解焦虑在孕妇网络成瘾中的作用。
在怀孕期间,尤其是在面临并发症的情况下,在线健康研究是很常见的。鉴于妇女在研究后会产生不愉快的情绪,令人惊讶的是,网络焦虑症(由焦虑引起的过度和重复的在线健康研究,会加剧这种焦虑)尚未在孕妇中进行研究。因此,本研究的目的是在考虑到健康焦虑(对个人健康的担忧)和妊娠特定焦虑(与妊娠和分娩有关的担忧)的情况下,研究有妊娠并发症和无妊娠并发症的妇女中网络成瘾的预测因素。共有 360 名孕妇填写了由简短健康焦虑量表、妊娠担忧量表和简短网络成瘾量表组成的调查问卷。单因素 MANOVA 分析结果显示,与无并发症的孕妇相比,妊娠并发症孕妇的健康焦虑、妊娠特异性焦虑和网络心理水平更高。分层多元回归分析表明,健康焦虑和妊娠特异性焦虑是网络成瘾的预测因素,但因并发症的不同而作用不同。在两个组别中,妊娠特异性焦虑对网络成瘾的预测均高于健康焦虑。健康焦虑只对无并发症的妇女有预测作用。总之,有并发症的妇女患网络成瘾症的几率更高。妊娠特异性焦虑和健康焦虑是孕妇患网络成瘾症的风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Women & Health
Women & Health Multiple-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Women & Health publishes original papers and critical reviews containing highly useful information for researchers, policy planners, and all providers of health care for women. These papers cover findings from studies concerning health and illness and physical and psychological well-being of women, as well as the environmental, lifestyle and sociocultural factors that are associated with health and disease, which have implications for prevention, early detection and treatment, limitation of disability and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of arterial stiffness index predictors in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. Pregnant women's depression and posttraumatic stress levels after the large-scale Turkey earthquakes: a cross-sectional study. Healthcare provider's perspective on the implementation & adoption of digitalized antenatal care services in Bangladesh. Gender roles as predictive factors on labor pain: a cross-sectional study. Mental health in mothers of children with autism spectrum disorder: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1