Intersectorality in a conditional cash transfer programme: Actors, convergences and conflicts.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Global Public Health Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-22 DOI:10.1080/17441692.2024.2306467
José Anael Neves, Luciene Burlandy, Maria Angélica Tavares de Medeiros
{"title":"Intersectorality in a conditional cash transfer programme: Actors, convergences and conflicts.","authors":"José Anael Neves, Luciene Burlandy, Maria Angélica Tavares de Medeiros","doi":"10.1080/17441692.2024.2306467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to analyse intersectoral arrangements among the health, education and social assistance sectors in the operationalization of the Bolsa Família Program (BFP). A qualitative approach was carried out, in a peripheral region of a large urban centre of Southeast Brazil. Data content analysis was performed on the basis of reference in the Actor-Network Theory (ANT) using statements by the actors and considering ideas in dispute and work processes in the geopolitical territorial context. Seventeen managers of Municipal Secretariats of Health, Education and Social Assistance were interviewed, as were basic education, primary health care and social assistance professionals. One-off, episodic and discontinuous intersectoral actions were identified, with limited integration among sectors. Convergences and conflicts were found with respect to the institutional processes of BFP. The convergences referred to the conceptions shared among the actors about the role of intersectoral collaboration, as they recognize themselves as providing care to the same vulnerable population. Considering the multiple vulnerabilities of these families, the convergence of actions from different sectors can impact factors that condition inequalities. The conflicts were related to institutional conditions, to sectorized work processes and to a lack of understanding by professionals about the duties of their respective sectors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12735,"journal":{"name":"Global Public Health","volume":"19 1","pages":"2306467"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2024.2306467","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to analyse intersectoral arrangements among the health, education and social assistance sectors in the operationalization of the Bolsa Família Program (BFP). A qualitative approach was carried out, in a peripheral region of a large urban centre of Southeast Brazil. Data content analysis was performed on the basis of reference in the Actor-Network Theory (ANT) using statements by the actors and considering ideas in dispute and work processes in the geopolitical territorial context. Seventeen managers of Municipal Secretariats of Health, Education and Social Assistance were interviewed, as were basic education, primary health care and social assistance professionals. One-off, episodic and discontinuous intersectoral actions were identified, with limited integration among sectors. Convergences and conflicts were found with respect to the institutional processes of BFP. The convergences referred to the conceptions shared among the actors about the role of intersectoral collaboration, as they recognize themselves as providing care to the same vulnerable population. Considering the multiple vulnerabilities of these families, the convergence of actions from different sectors can impact factors that condition inequalities. The conflicts were related to institutional conditions, to sectorized work processes and to a lack of understanding by professionals about the duties of their respective sectors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有条件现金转移计划的跨部门性:参与者、趋同性和冲突。
本研究旨在分析在实施家庭补助金计划(BFP)过程中卫生、教育和社会援助部门之间的跨部门安排。研究采用定性方法,在巴西东南部一个大城市中心的周边地区进行。数据内容分析以行动者-网络理论(ANT)为参考,使用了行动者的陈述,并考虑了地缘政治背景下争议和工作过程中的想法。对 17 名市卫生、教育和社会援助秘书处的管理人员以及基础教育、初级卫生保健和社会援助专业人员进行了访谈。确定了一次性、偶发和不连续的跨部门行动,各部门之间的整合有限。在《中期战略》的体制进程方面发现了趋同和冲突。趋同是指各行动方对跨部门合作的作用有共同的认识,因为他们都认为自己是在为同一弱势人群提供照料。考虑到这些家庭的多重脆弱性,不同部门的行动汇聚在一起可以对造成不平等的因素产生影响。这些冲突与机构条件、部门化工作流程以及专业人员对各自部门的职责缺乏了解有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Public Health
Global Public Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: Global Public Health is an essential peer-reviewed journal that energetically engages with key public health issues that have come to the fore in the global environment — mounting inequalities between rich and poor; the globalization of trade; new patterns of travel and migration; epidemics of newly-emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases; the HIV/AIDS pandemic; the increase in chronic illnesses; escalating pressure on public health infrastructures around the world; and the growing range and scale of conflict situations, terrorist threats, environmental pressures, natural and human-made disasters.
期刊最新文献
Hypothetical acceptability of minimally invasive tissue sampling and considerations for practice: A qualitative study in Vietnam Unravelling the nexus of microfinance and women’s non-communicable disease (NCD) health outcomes in Sri Lanka: An exploratory study Can health promotion facilitate development in fragile states?: An instrumental variable estimation with panel data The health workforce conundrum for burn care in Uttar Pradesh, India: a qualitative exploration Access to adolescent sexual and reproductive health services in Accra, Ghana: An exploratory qualitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1