Drivers of men's use of intimate partner violence in conflict-affected settings: learnings from the Democratic Republic of Congo.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Conflict and Health Pub Date : 2024-01-22 DOI:10.1186/s13031-023-00562-5
Christine Bourey, Rashelle J Musci, Judith K Bass, Nancy Glass, Amani Matabaro, Jocelyn T D Kelly
{"title":"Drivers of men's use of intimate partner violence in conflict-affected settings: learnings from the Democratic Republic of Congo.","authors":"Christine Bourey, Rashelle J Musci, Judith K Bass, Nancy Glass, Amani Matabaro, Jocelyn T D Kelly","doi":"10.1186/s13031-023-00562-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) is prevalent in conflict-affected settings. Yet, there is limited knowledge about the risk factors that influence men's use of IPVAW in conflict-affected settings. This paper adopts a transdisciplinary perspective to understand how experiences hypothesized to increase men's use of IPVAW relate to each other and to men's use of IPVAW. The findings may help researchers and interventionists to better select and target interventions for IPVAW in conflict-affected settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used baseline data from the Tushinde Ujeuri project in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Men with at least partial data for the variables of interest were included in the analysis (n = 2080). We estimated a structural equation model that explored how five constructs - interpersonal violence, mental health, socioeconomic adversity, gender inequitable attitudes, and conflict violence - influenced men's self-reported past-year use of physical and/or sexual IPVAW.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model had acceptable fit (χ<sup>2</sup> = 1576.574, p = 0.000; RMSEA = 0.041; CLI = 0.882; SRMR = 0.055). There was a statistically significant path from interpersonal violence to IPVAW (β = 0.875; OR = 2.40). Interpersonal violence also was linked to gender inequitable attitudes (β = 0.364), which were linked to increased use of IPVAW (β = 0.180; OR = 1.20). Moreover, interpersonal violence was linked to trauma symptoms (β = 0.331), which were linked to increased use of IPVAW (β = 0.238; OR = 1.27). Use of IPVAW decreased as conflict exposures increased (β=-0.036; OR = 0.96), and there was no path from socioeconomic adversity to IPVAW.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest interpersonal violence exposures, trauma symptoms, and gender inequitable attitudes are all risk factors for the use of IPVAW in a conflict-affected setting. While continuing to focus on gender inequitable attitudes and norms, interventionists should also consider addressing men's experiences of victimization and mental wellbeing. Doing so can help to improve trauma symptoms and may hold promise to reduce IPVAW in conflict-affected settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":54287,"journal":{"name":"Conflict and Health","volume":"18 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10804634/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-023-00562-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) is prevalent in conflict-affected settings. Yet, there is limited knowledge about the risk factors that influence men's use of IPVAW in conflict-affected settings. This paper adopts a transdisciplinary perspective to understand how experiences hypothesized to increase men's use of IPVAW relate to each other and to men's use of IPVAW. The findings may help researchers and interventionists to better select and target interventions for IPVAW in conflict-affected settings.

Methods: We used baseline data from the Tushinde Ujeuri project in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Men with at least partial data for the variables of interest were included in the analysis (n = 2080). We estimated a structural equation model that explored how five constructs - interpersonal violence, mental health, socioeconomic adversity, gender inequitable attitudes, and conflict violence - influenced men's self-reported past-year use of physical and/or sexual IPVAW.

Results: The model had acceptable fit (χ2 = 1576.574, p = 0.000; RMSEA = 0.041; CLI = 0.882; SRMR = 0.055). There was a statistically significant path from interpersonal violence to IPVAW (β = 0.875; OR = 2.40). Interpersonal violence also was linked to gender inequitable attitudes (β = 0.364), which were linked to increased use of IPVAW (β = 0.180; OR = 1.20). Moreover, interpersonal violence was linked to trauma symptoms (β = 0.331), which were linked to increased use of IPVAW (β = 0.238; OR = 1.27). Use of IPVAW decreased as conflict exposures increased (β=-0.036; OR = 0.96), and there was no path from socioeconomic adversity to IPVAW.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest interpersonal violence exposures, trauma symptoms, and gender inequitable attitudes are all risk factors for the use of IPVAW in a conflict-affected setting. While continuing to focus on gender inequitable attitudes and norms, interventionists should also consider addressing men's experiences of victimization and mental wellbeing. Doing so can help to improve trauma symptoms and may hold promise to reduce IPVAW in conflict-affected settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
受冲突影响环境中男性使用亲密伴侣暴力的驱动因素:从刚果民主共和国学到的经验。
背景:在受冲突影响的环境中,亲密伴侣对妇女的暴力行为(IPVAW)十分普遍。然而,人们对影响男性在受冲突影响的环境中使用 IPVAW 的风险因素了解有限。本文采用跨学科的视角来理解假设会增加男性使用对妇女的暴力的经历与男性使用对妇女的暴力之间的关系。研究结果可帮助研究人员和干预人员在受冲突影响的环境中更好地选择和有针对性地干预对女性的暴力侵害:我们使用了刚果民主共和国 Tushinde Ujeuri 项目的基线数据。至少有部分相关变量数据的男性被纳入分析(n = 2080)。我们估算了一个结构方程模型,该模型探讨了人际暴力、心理健康、社会经济逆境、性别不平等态度和冲突暴力这五个因素如何影响男性自我报告的过去一年中对身体和/或性的 IPVAW 的使用:该模型具有可接受的拟合度(χ2 = 1576.574,p = 0.000;RMSEA = 0.041;CLI = 0.882;SRMR = 0.055)。从人际暴力到 IPVAW 存在一条具有统计学意义的路径(β = 0.875;OR = 2.40)。人际暴力还与性别不平等态度有关(β = 0.364),而性别不平等态度又与使用 IPVAW 的增加有关(β = 0.180;OR = 1.20)。此外,人际暴力与创伤症状有关(β = 0.331),而创伤症状又与使用对妇女的暴力行为增加有关(β = 0.238; OR = 1.27)。随着冲突暴露的增加,使用 IPVAW 的情况有所减少(β=-0.036;OR = 0.96),社会经济逆境与 IPVAW 没有关系:我们的研究结果表明,在受冲突影响的环境中,人际暴力暴露、创伤症状和性别不平等的态度都是使用 IPVAW 的风险因素。在继续关注性别不平等态度和规范的同时,干预人员还应考虑解决男性的受害经历和心理健康问题。这样做有助于改善创伤症状,并有望减少受冲突影响环境中的对妇女的暴力侵害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Conflict and Health
Conflict and Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
57
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Conflict and Health is a highly-accessed, open access journal providing a global platform to disseminate insightful and impactful studies documenting the public health impacts and responses related to armed conflict, humanitarian crises, and forced migration.
期刊最新文献
Realising health justice in Palestine: beyond humanitarian voices. A descriptive analysis of a medical humanitarian aid initiative for quality perinatal management in war-torn Ukraine. Evaluation of a peer support group programme for vulnerable host population and refugees living with diabetes and/or hypertension in Lebanon: a before-after study. Social determinants of student mental health before and after the Beirut port explosion: two cross-sectional studies. Examining the integration of refugees into the national health system in Uganda: an analysis using the policy triangle framework.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1