Comparison of the traditional and block mode of delivery on undergraduate nursing students' perceived levels of preparedness to use evidence-based practice: a two-group experimental study.

IF 1.3 Q3 NURSING International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship Pub Date : 2024-01-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1515/ijnes-2023-0082
Trish A Burton, Sally A Gauci, Liza M Heslop, Sharon J Andrew
{"title":"Comparison of the traditional and block mode of delivery on undergraduate nursing students' perceived levels of preparedness to use evidence-based practice: a two-group experimental study.","authors":"Trish A Burton, Sally A Gauci, Liza M Heslop, Sharon J Andrew","doi":"10.1515/ijnes-2023-0082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine how delivery time impacted on undergraduate nursing students' preparedness for evidence-based practice (EBP) by comparing the traditional semester mode and block mode of delivery models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This two-group experimental study compared the traditional semester and block modes of delivery using a self-reported questionnaire. The factor of time was the variable in relation to learning with the block mode delivery being in a compressed timeframe.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a purposive sample, 219 students participated in the self-reported questionnaire. There were only two significant differences were the block mode of delivery students responded less positively to the statements 'the unit of study prepared them for knowledge and skills for EBP' and 'EBP should be discussed and shared in practice'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The transition from the traditional semester mode to the block mode delivery has had minimal impact on undergraduate nursing students' perceptions of EBP and its application to clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":35294,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2023-0082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To examine how delivery time impacted on undergraduate nursing students' preparedness for evidence-based practice (EBP) by comparing the traditional semester mode and block mode of delivery models.

Methods: This two-group experimental study compared the traditional semester and block modes of delivery using a self-reported questionnaire. The factor of time was the variable in relation to learning with the block mode delivery being in a compressed timeframe.

Results: From a purposive sample, 219 students participated in the self-reported questionnaire. There were only two significant differences were the block mode of delivery students responded less positively to the statements 'the unit of study prepared them for knowledge and skills for EBP' and 'EBP should be discussed and shared in practice'.

Conclusions: The transition from the traditional semester mode to the block mode delivery has had minimal impact on undergraduate nursing students' perceptions of EBP and its application to clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统授课模式与分块授课模式对护理专业本科生使用循证实践的准备程度的影响比较:一项两组实验研究。
目的通过比较传统的学期授课模式和分段授课模式,研究授课时间如何影响护理专业本科生对循证实践(EBP)的准备程度:这项两组实验研究使用自我报告问卷比较了传统的学期授课模式和分块授课模式。时间因素是与学习相关的变量,分块教学模式的时间框架被压缩:通过有目的的抽样调查,219 名学生参与了自我报告问卷调查。结果:219 名学生参加了自我报告问卷调查,其中只有两个明显的差异,即采用整段教学模式的学生对 "学习单元为他们准备了 EBP 的知识和技能 "和 "EBP 应在实践中讨论和分享 "这两个陈述的正面回答较少:结论:从传统的学期授课模式过渡到模块授课模式,对护理专业本科生对 EBP 及其在临床实践中的应用的看法影响甚微。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship publishes significant research and scholarship in the broad field of nursing education. The mandate of the journal is to present high quality papers to advance nursing education through research, description of innovative methods, or introduction of novel approaches about all aspects of nursing education in a timely manner. The specific aims of IJNES are to: - Promote worldwide scholarship in nursing education - Enhance and advance nursing education globally - Provide a forum for the dissemination of international perspectives and scholarship in nursing education
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward infection control precautions among nurses in Palestinian hospitals. Nursing students' experience of a transformative approach to teaching cross cultural clinical decision making. AI-generated vs. student-crafted assignments and implications for evaluating student work in nursing: an exploratory reflection. Barriers to and facilitators of accelerated BSN students' success: a scoping review with possible strategies for success. Effectiveness of educational video on standardized nursing language for nursing home nurses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1