How Feasible Are Digital Intraoperative Plain Radiographs in Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery?

J Benjamin Allis, Devon M Jeffcoat, Eric D Farrell
{"title":"How Feasible Are Digital Intraoperative Plain Radiographs in Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery?","authors":"J Benjamin Allis, Devon M Jeffcoat, Eric D Farrell","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of obtaining routine intraoperative plain radiographs during orthopaedic trauma surgery. Seventy consecutive orthopaedic trauma patients in which intraoperative plain films were obtained in addition to fluoroscopy were reviewed. For each patient the time it took to obtain intraoperative plain radiographs was prospectively measured, in addition to the number of images taken, and quality of image. Then relative imaging times based on fracture locations were compared and the need for revision surgery based on mal-reduction or implant mal-positioning assessed. The average time required for intraoperative plain films to be obtained and reviewed by the surgeon was 3 minutes and 45 seconds. On average, 2.8 images were taken during each surgery. Proximal images took on average 44 seconds longer than distal images to obtain (p = 0.047). There was no significant difference in imaging times for upper versus lower extremities (p = 0.448). High quality images were obtained on all patients. There were no re-operations required in this series for mal-reduction of fracture, mal-positioning of implants or infection. In this study, there were no re-operations or perioperative complications when intraoperative plain films were obtained. Intraoperative plain films are a valuable tool for complex periarticular surgery or other cases where fracture reduction or implant location may be in question. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 32(3):160-163, 2023).</p>","PeriodicalId":516534,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of obtaining routine intraoperative plain radiographs during orthopaedic trauma surgery. Seventy consecutive orthopaedic trauma patients in which intraoperative plain films were obtained in addition to fluoroscopy were reviewed. For each patient the time it took to obtain intraoperative plain radiographs was prospectively measured, in addition to the number of images taken, and quality of image. Then relative imaging times based on fracture locations were compared and the need for revision surgery based on mal-reduction or implant mal-positioning assessed. The average time required for intraoperative plain films to be obtained and reviewed by the surgeon was 3 minutes and 45 seconds. On average, 2.8 images were taken during each surgery. Proximal images took on average 44 seconds longer than distal images to obtain (p = 0.047). There was no significant difference in imaging times for upper versus lower extremities (p = 0.448). High quality images were obtained on all patients. There were no re-operations required in this series for mal-reduction of fracture, mal-positioning of implants or infection. In this study, there were no re-operations or perioperative complications when intraoperative plain films were obtained. Intraoperative plain films are a valuable tool for complex periarticular surgery or other cases where fracture reduction or implant location may be in question. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 32(3):160-163, 2023).

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字术中平片在创伤骨科手术中的可行性有多大?
本研究的目的是评估在创伤骨科手术中获取常规术中平片的可行性和结果。研究人员对 70 名连续接受骨科创伤手术的患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者在接受透视检查的同时还接受了术中平片检查。对每位患者术中获取平片所需的时间进行了前瞻性测量,此外还测量了所拍图像的数量和图像质量。然后根据骨折位置对相对成像时间进行比较,并评估是否需要进行因缩小不良或植入物位置不正而导致的翻修手术。术中获取平片并由外科医生审核所需的平均时间为 3 分 45 秒。每次手术平均拍摄 2.8 张图像。拍摄近端图像的平均时间比拍摄远端图像的平均时间长 44 秒(p = 0.047)。上肢与下肢的成像时间没有明显差异(p = 0.448)。所有患者都获得了高质量的图像。在这一系列研究中,没有人因骨折复位不良、植入物位置不当或感染而需要再次手术。在这项研究中,获得术中平片后没有出现再次手术或围手术期并发症。术中平片对于复杂的关节周围手术或其他可能存在骨折复位或植入物位置问题的病例来说是一种非常有价值的工具。(外科骨科进展杂志》32(3):160-163,2023 年)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Incidence of Urinary Retention Following Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent and Pediatric Scoliosis at a Single Academic Center: Is There a Role for Prophylactic Tamsulosin? Indirect Coronal Reduction Technique Using a Volar Locking Plate in Distal Radius Fractures: A Case Series. Major Metropolitan Area COVID-19 - Positive Patients Undergoing Emergency and Elective Orthopaedic Surgeries: A Case-matched Control Study. Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Increased Body Mass Associated with Decreased Bracing Outcomes. Fluoroscopy and Radiographs for Detecting Retained Surgical Needles in the Hand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1