A Longitudinal Metagenomic Comparative Analysis of Oral Microbiome Shifts in Patients Receiving Proton Radiation versus Photon Radiation for Head and Neck Cancer.

Journal of cancer & allied specialties Pub Date : 2024-01-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.37029/jcas.v10i1.579
Timothy F Meiller, Claire M Fraser, Silvia Grant-Beurmann, Mike Humphrys, Luke Tallon, Lisa D Sadzewicz, Mary Ann Jabra-Rizk, Areej Alfaifi, Anmar Kensara, Jason K Molitoris, Matthew Witek, William S Mendes, William F Regine, Phuoc T Tran, Robert C Miller, Ahmed S Sultan
{"title":"A Longitudinal Metagenomic Comparative Analysis of Oral Microbiome Shifts in Patients Receiving Proton Radiation versus Photon Radiation for Head and Neck Cancer.","authors":"Timothy F Meiller, Claire M Fraser, Silvia Grant-Beurmann, Mike Humphrys, Luke Tallon, Lisa D Sadzewicz, Mary Ann Jabra-Rizk, Areej Alfaifi, Anmar Kensara, Jason K Molitoris, Matthew Witek, William S Mendes, William F Regine, Phuoc T Tran, Robert C Miller, Ahmed S Sultan","doi":"10.37029/jcas.v10i1.579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Due to the radiation-sparing effects on salivary gland acini, changes in the composition of the oral microbiome may be a driver for improved outcomes in patients receiving proton radiation, with potentially worse outcomes in patients exposed to photon radiation therapy. To date, a head-to-head comparison of oral microbiome changes at a metagenomic level with longitudinal sampling has yet to be performed in these patient cohorts.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>To comparatively analyze oral microbiome shifts during head and neck radiation therapy, a prospective pilot cohort study was performed at the Maryland Proton Treatment Center and the University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center. A longitudinal metagenomic comparative analysis of oral microbiome shifts was performed at three time points (pre-radiation, during radiation, and immediately post-radiation). Head and neck cancer patients receiving proton radiation (<i>n</i> = 4) were compared to photon radiation (<i>n</i> = 4). Additional control groups included healthy age- and sex-matched controls (<i>n</i> = 5), head and neck cancer patients who never received radiation therapy (<i>n</i> = 8), and patients with oral inflammatory disease (<i>n</i> = 3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Photon therapy patients presented with lower microbial alpha diversity at all timepoints, and there was a trend towards reduced species richness as compared with proton therapy. Healthy controls and proton patients exhibited overall higher and similar diversity. A more dysbiotic state was observed in patients receiving photon therapy as compared to proton therapy, in which oral microbial homeostasis was maintained. Mucositis was observed in 3/4 photon patients and was not observed in any proton patients during radiation therapy. The bacterial de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis pathway and the nitrate reduction V pathway were comparatively higher following photon exposure. These functional changes in bacterial metabolism may suggest that photon exposure produces a more permissive environment for the proliferation of pathogenic bacteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Oral microbiome dysbiosis in patients receiving photon radiation may be associated with increased mucositis occurrence. Proton radiation therapy for head and neck cancer demonstrates a safer side effect profile in terms of oral complications, oral microbiome dysbiosis, and functional metabolic status.</p>","PeriodicalId":73631,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer & allied specialties","volume":"10 1","pages":"579"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10793722/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer & allied specialties","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37029/jcas.v10i1.579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Due to the radiation-sparing effects on salivary gland acini, changes in the composition of the oral microbiome may be a driver for improved outcomes in patients receiving proton radiation, with potentially worse outcomes in patients exposed to photon radiation therapy. To date, a head-to-head comparison of oral microbiome changes at a metagenomic level with longitudinal sampling has yet to be performed in these patient cohorts.

Methods and materials: To comparatively analyze oral microbiome shifts during head and neck radiation therapy, a prospective pilot cohort study was performed at the Maryland Proton Treatment Center and the University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center. A longitudinal metagenomic comparative analysis of oral microbiome shifts was performed at three time points (pre-radiation, during radiation, and immediately post-radiation). Head and neck cancer patients receiving proton radiation (n = 4) were compared to photon radiation (n = 4). Additional control groups included healthy age- and sex-matched controls (n = 5), head and neck cancer patients who never received radiation therapy (n = 8), and patients with oral inflammatory disease (n = 3).

Results: Photon therapy patients presented with lower microbial alpha diversity at all timepoints, and there was a trend towards reduced species richness as compared with proton therapy. Healthy controls and proton patients exhibited overall higher and similar diversity. A more dysbiotic state was observed in patients receiving photon therapy as compared to proton therapy, in which oral microbial homeostasis was maintained. Mucositis was observed in 3/4 photon patients and was not observed in any proton patients during radiation therapy. The bacterial de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis pathway and the nitrate reduction V pathway were comparatively higher following photon exposure. These functional changes in bacterial metabolism may suggest that photon exposure produces a more permissive environment for the proliferation of pathogenic bacteria.

Conclusion: Oral microbiome dysbiosis in patients receiving photon radiation may be associated with increased mucositis occurrence. Proton radiation therapy for head and neck cancer demonstrates a safer side effect profile in terms of oral complications, oral microbiome dysbiosis, and functional metabolic status.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对接受质子辐射与光子辐射治疗头颈癌患者口腔微生物组变化的纵向元基因组对比分析
简介由于放射线对唾液腺尖锐湿疣有保护作用,口腔微生物组组成的变化可能是改善质子放射治疗患者预后的驱动因素,而光子放射治疗患者的预后可能较差。迄今为止,在这些患者队列中,还没有在元基因组水平上对口腔微生物组的变化进行头对头的比较和纵向采样:为了比较分析头颈部放射治疗期间口腔微生物组的变化,马里兰质子治疗中心和马里兰大学马琳和斯图尔特-格林鲍姆综合癌症中心开展了一项前瞻性试点队列研究。在三个时间点(放射前、放射期间和放射后)对口腔微生物组的变化进行了纵向元基因组比较分析。接受质子辐射(4 人)的头颈部癌症患者与接受光子辐射(4 人)的头颈部癌症患者进行了比较。其他对照组包括年龄和性别匹配的健康对照组(5 人)、从未接受过放射治疗的头颈部癌症患者(8 人)和口腔炎症患者(3 人):光子治疗患者在所有时间点的微生物α多样性都较低,与质子治疗相比,物种丰富度呈下降趋势。健康对照组和质子治疗患者的微生物多样性总体较高且相似。与质子疗法相比,接受光子疗法的患者口腔微生物平衡保持良好,而接受质子疗法的患者则更容易出现菌群失调。在放疗期间,3/4 的光子患者出现了口腔粘膜炎,而质子患者没有出现口腔粘膜炎。光子照射后,细菌的新嘧啶生物合成途径和硝酸盐还原 V 途径相对较高。细菌新陈代谢的这些功能变化可能表明,光子照射为致病菌的增殖创造了更有利的环境:结论:接受光子照射的患者口腔微生物群失调可能与粘膜炎发生率增加有关。就口腔并发症、口腔微生物群失调和功能代谢状况而言,头颈部癌症质子放射治疗的副作用更安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Marginal Contribution of Pathogenic RAD51D Germline Variants to Pakistani Early-Onset and Familial Breast/Ovarian Cancer Patients. Mitigating Cardiotoxicity Associated with Anticancer Drugs: An Updated Systematic Review. Survival Outcomes in Malignancy-related Hypercalcemia: A Tertiary Care Single-center Experience. Cancer Statistics from the Shaukat Khanum Memorial Trust's Hospital-based Cancer Registry, Pakistan, 1994-2022: An Observational Study. Clinical Outcome of Patients Receiving Rituximab in Combination with Bendamustine in Indolent B-cell Lymphomas: A Single-center Institutional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1