Examining the Seventeenth-Century Copper Trade: An Analysis of Smelted Copper from Sites in Virginia and North Carolina

IF 2.7 1区 历史学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY American Antiquity Pub Date : 2024-01-23 DOI:10.1017/aaq.2023.99
Christopher M. Stevenson, Madeleine Gunter-Bassett, Laure Dussubieux
{"title":"Examining the Seventeenth-Century Copper Trade: An Analysis of Smelted Copper from Sites in Virginia and North Carolina","authors":"Christopher M. Stevenson, Madeleine Gunter-Bassett, Laure Dussubieux","doi":"10.1017/aaq.2023.99","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>When the colonists who made up the Virginia Company of London established James Fort on the banks of the James River in 1607, they brought with them sheets of scrap copper. Based in large part on the experience of the earlier Roanoke Colony, the English knew that copper was a highly prized material among Native peoples of the Chesapeake, and they brought it with them as a trade item. Artifacts made from European smelted copper (impure copper and copper alloy) have been found at contact period sites (ca. AD 1607–1680) throughout Virginia, and James Fort has long been hypothesized to be the primary distribution point for that material. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the elemental composition of a sample of smelted copper artifacts from James Fort (1607–ca. 1625), as well as samples of copper artifacts from five Native sites in central Virginia. We also analyzed a sample of copper artifacts from another well-known European fort site—Fort San Juan (1567–1568) in North Carolina. The results suggest that although a portion of the smelted copper that circulated through Native networks in Virginia came from James Fort, the rest of it possibly came from English, French, or Dutch distribution points to the northeast.</p>","PeriodicalId":7424,"journal":{"name":"American Antiquity","volume":"104 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Antiquity","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2023.99","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When the colonists who made up the Virginia Company of London established James Fort on the banks of the James River in 1607, they brought with them sheets of scrap copper. Based in large part on the experience of the earlier Roanoke Colony, the English knew that copper was a highly prized material among Native peoples of the Chesapeake, and they brought it with them as a trade item. Artifacts made from European smelted copper (impure copper and copper alloy) have been found at contact period sites (ca. AD 1607–1680) throughout Virginia, and James Fort has long been hypothesized to be the primary distribution point for that material. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the elemental composition of a sample of smelted copper artifacts from James Fort (1607–ca. 1625), as well as samples of copper artifacts from five Native sites in central Virginia. We also analyzed a sample of copper artifacts from another well-known European fort site—Fort San Juan (1567–1568) in North Carolina. The results suggest that although a portion of the smelted copper that circulated through Native networks in Virginia came from James Fort, the rest of it possibly came from English, French, or Dutch distribution points to the northeast.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考察十七世纪的铜贸易:弗吉尼亚州和北卡罗来纳州冶炼铜遗址分析
1607 年,伦敦弗吉尼亚公司(Virginia Company of London)的殖民者们在詹姆斯河畔建立了詹姆斯堡(James Fort),他们带来了成片的废铜。英国人知道铜在切萨皮克原住民中是一种非常珍贵的材料,因此他们将铜作为贸易物品带来,这在很大程度上是基于早期罗阿诺克殖民地的经验。在弗吉尼亚各地的接触期遗址(约公元 1607-1680 年)中都发现了由欧洲人冶炼的铜(不纯铜和铜合金)制成的工艺品,而詹姆斯堡一直被认为是这种材料的主要集散地。为了验证这一假设,我们分析了詹姆斯堡(1607-约 1625 年)冶炼铜器样品以及弗吉尼亚州中部五个土著遗址铜器样品的元素组成。我们还分析了另一个著名的欧洲要塞遗址--北卡罗来纳州圣胡安要塞(1567-1568 年)出土的铜器样本。研究结果表明,尽管弗吉尼亚州土著网络中流通的冶炼铜有一部分来自詹姆斯堡,但其余铜可能来自东北部的英国、法国或荷兰分布点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Antiquity
American Antiquity Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
95
期刊最新文献
Starch Granule Evidence for Biscuitroot (Lomatium spp.) Processing at Upland Rock Art Sites in Warner Valley, Oregon Luminescence Dating of Stone Structures in the Northeastern United States Farmers with a Taste for Fish: New Insights into Iroquoian Foodways at the Dawson Site Reevaluating the Organization of Lapidary Production at Chaco Canyon Approaching the Past through Practice: Reconstruction of a Historical Greenlandic Dog Sled
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1