Compare the Effectiveness of Interferential Therapy with Mckenzie Versus TENS With Mckenzie to Reduce Low Back Pain

Ahalya. S, Vinodhkumar Ramalingam, Prathap Suganthirababu, Jagatheesan Alagesan, Pradeep Balakrishnan
{"title":"Compare the Effectiveness of Interferential Therapy with Mckenzie Versus TENS With Mckenzie to Reduce Low Back Pain","authors":"Ahalya. S, Vinodhkumar Ramalingam, Prathap Suganthirababu, Jagatheesan Alagesan, Pradeep Balakrishnan","doi":"10.37506/fwp1e142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Low back pain is not an illness but rather a collection of symptoms that are typically acute and selflimiting.It has an impact on work performance and general wellbeing. The most commonly used modalities ofLBP are Interferential therapy and TENS. Hence this research work is done to check the effectiveness of IFT withMcKenzie and TENS with McKenzie for reducing low back pain.Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of IFT and TENS combined with McKenzie to reduce low back pain.Materials and Methods: 60 subjects were selected based on selection criteria.. The subjects were assessed usingVAS and OSWESTRY Low back pain disability questionnaires . The subjects selected were divided into twogroups. IFT group(n=30) received IFT for 20 minutes per day combined with McKenzie exercises TENS group (n=30) received TENS for 20 minutes per day combined with McKenzie exercises. These interventions were given for4 days per week for 2 weeks. Study period: October 2022 to July 2023.Result: The pretest and posttest values were analyzed and results suggest that the IFT group has significantimprovement when compared with the TENS group with p value <0.0001.Conclusion: The study concludes that the IFT with McKenzie and TENS with McKenzie is effective for patientswith low back pain but IFT with McKenzie seems to be more effective than TENS with McKenzie.","PeriodicalId":516273,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy &amp; Occupational Therapy - An International Journal","volume":"11 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy &amp; Occupational Therapy - An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37506/fwp1e142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low back pain is not an illness but rather a collection of symptoms that are typically acute and selflimiting.It has an impact on work performance and general wellbeing. The most commonly used modalities ofLBP are Interferential therapy and TENS. Hence this research work is done to check the effectiveness of IFT withMcKenzie and TENS with McKenzie for reducing low back pain.Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of IFT and TENS combined with McKenzie to reduce low back pain.Materials and Methods: 60 subjects were selected based on selection criteria.. The subjects were assessed usingVAS and OSWESTRY Low back pain disability questionnaires . The subjects selected were divided into twogroups. IFT group(n=30) received IFT for 20 minutes per day combined with McKenzie exercises TENS group (n=30) received TENS for 20 minutes per day combined with McKenzie exercises. These interventions were given for4 days per week for 2 weeks. Study period: October 2022 to July 2023.Result: The pretest and posttest values were analyzed and results suggest that the IFT group has significantimprovement when compared with the TENS group with p value <0.0001.Conclusion: The study concludes that the IFT with McKenzie and TENS with McKenzie is effective for patientswith low back pain but IFT with McKenzie seems to be more effective than TENS with McKenzie.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较使用 Mckenzie 进行干扰治疗与使用 Mckenzie 进行 TENS 治疗对减轻腰痛的效果
背景:腰背痛不是一种疾病,而是一系列典型的急性和自限性症状。治疗腰背痛最常用的方法是干扰治疗和 TENS。因此,本研究工作旨在检查 IFT 与 McKenzie 以及 TENS 与 McKenzie 对减轻腰背痛的效果。目的:比较 IFT 和 TENS 与 McKenzie 结合对减轻腰背痛的效果。使用 VAS 和 OSWESTRY 腰痛残疾问卷对受试者进行评估。选定的受试者被分为两组。IFT 组(n=30)每天进行 20 分钟的 IFT,并结合麦肯锡运动;TENS 组(n=30)每天进行 20 分钟的 TENS,并结合麦肯锡运动。这些干预每周进行 4 天,为期 2 周。研究时间研究时间:2022 年 10 月至 2023 年 7 月:结果:分析了前测和后测值,结果表明,与 TENS 组相比,IFT 组有显著改善,P 值<0.0001:该研究得出结论,麦肯锡腰背痛综合疗法和麦肯锡腰背痛TENS疗法对腰背痛患者有效,但麦肯锡腰背痛综合疗法似乎比麦肯锡腰背痛TENS疗法更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Additional Effects Of Suboccipital Muscle Inhibition Along With Conventional Approach On Pain, Physical Function and Range of Motion in Patients with Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain: An Experimental Study Effect of TheraBand Exercises on Rounded Shoulders Associated with Pulmonary Capacity in Young Adults: A Pre-Post Intervention Study COVID-19 Effects on Well-being and Academic Performance in Physical Therapy Graduate Students: A Cross-Sectional Study Grip Strength Assessed Using A Hand Grip Dynamometer And Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire As Predictors Of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Using Rapid Upper Limb Assessment Among Power Loom Silk Weavers Effects of a Novel, Inexpensive Device “Striker” On Spatio-Temporal GaitParameters in Individuals with Parkinson’s Disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1