Ectopia Lentis: Clinical profiles in a large cohort of children from a Tertiary Eye Care network in India

IF 1 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-01-19 DOI:10.4103/tjo.tjo-d-23-00150
M. Bhate, A. Das, R. Kekunnaya, V. Sachdeva, Muralidhar Ramappa, V. Warkad, Debasmita Majhi
{"title":"Ectopia Lentis: Clinical profiles in a large cohort of children from a Tertiary Eye Care network in India","authors":"M. Bhate, A. Das, R. Kekunnaya, V. Sachdeva, Muralidhar Ramappa, V. Warkad, Debasmita Majhi","doi":"10.4103/tjo.tjo-d-23-00150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n To study the clinical presentations, visual, and refractive profiles of children with congenital ectopia lentis in a large cohort of patients from a tertiary eye care network in India.\n \n \n \n A retrospective review of electronic medical records from December 2012 to December 2020 was conducted. Two hundred and ninety-seven consecutive children ≤18 years of age at presentation were identified and analyzed for demographic details, patient distribution, lens subluxation, visual, and refractive profiles before and after the interventions.\n \n \n \n Five hundred and ninety-four eyes of 297 (male 56%; n = 166) patients were analyzed. The mean age at presentation was 8.74 ± 3.89. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at presentation ranged from 0.3 logMAR to 3.5 logMAR; (Snellen: 6/9 – close to face [CF]) (mean 0.89 ± 0.68). High myopia (n = 201; 33.83%) and mild astigmatism (n = 340; 57.23%) were more frequent. Temporal (n = 108; 18.18%) subluxation was most common followed by superior. Lensectomy with limited vitrectomy was performed in 243 eyes of 127 patients (40.90%). Median preoperative BCVA was 1.0 (range: 0.3–3.5 logMAR; 20/40 - CF). Median postoperative BCVA was 0.5 logMAR (6/18) in the pseudophakic group and 0.6 logMAR (6/24) in the aphakic group. Spherical equivalent in myopic children reduced from −12.06 ± 6.84D to −1.57D (−0.25D to − 5.5D) in the pseudophakic group and +9.3D (+5.5D to 15.5D) in the aphakic group.\n \n \n \n This study is a large cohort of children presenting with ectopia lentis. Following intervention, an improvement in the median BCVA and refractive correction was noted in the entire cohort.\n","PeriodicalId":44978,"journal":{"name":"Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjo.tjo-d-23-00150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To study the clinical presentations, visual, and refractive profiles of children with congenital ectopia lentis in a large cohort of patients from a tertiary eye care network in India. A retrospective review of electronic medical records from December 2012 to December 2020 was conducted. Two hundred and ninety-seven consecutive children ≤18 years of age at presentation were identified and analyzed for demographic details, patient distribution, lens subluxation, visual, and refractive profiles before and after the interventions. Five hundred and ninety-four eyes of 297 (male 56%; n = 166) patients were analyzed. The mean age at presentation was 8.74 ± 3.89. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at presentation ranged from 0.3 logMAR to 3.5 logMAR; (Snellen: 6/9 – close to face [CF]) (mean 0.89 ± 0.68). High myopia (n = 201; 33.83%) and mild astigmatism (n = 340; 57.23%) were more frequent. Temporal (n = 108; 18.18%) subluxation was most common followed by superior. Lensectomy with limited vitrectomy was performed in 243 eyes of 127 patients (40.90%). Median preoperative BCVA was 1.0 (range: 0.3–3.5 logMAR; 20/40 - CF). Median postoperative BCVA was 0.5 logMAR (6/18) in the pseudophakic group and 0.6 logMAR (6/24) in the aphakic group. Spherical equivalent in myopic children reduced from −12.06 ± 6.84D to −1.57D (−0.25D to − 5.5D) in the pseudophakic group and +9.3D (+5.5D to 15.5D) in the aphakic group. This study is a large cohort of children presenting with ectopia lentis. Following intervention, an improvement in the median BCVA and refractive correction was noted in the entire cohort.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼睑外翻:来自印度三级眼科医疗网络的一大批儿童的临床特征
目的:研究印度一家三级眼科医疗网络的庞大患者队列中患有先天性眼睑外翻的儿童的临床表现、视力和屈光情况。 该研究对 2012 年 12 月至 2020 年 12 月期间的电子病历进行了回顾性分析。共确定了297名就诊时年龄小于18岁的连续儿童,并对干预前后的人口统计学细节、患者分布、晶状体脱位、视力和屈光情况进行了分析。 共对 297 名患者(男性占 56%;n = 166)的 594 只眼睛进行了分析。患者的平均年龄为(8.74 ± 3.89)岁。发病时的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)从 0.3 logMAR 到 3.5 logMAR 不等;(斯奈伦视力表:6/9 - 近视 [CF])(平均值为 0.89 ± 0.68)。高度近视(n = 201;33.83%)和轻度散光(n = 340;57.23%)更为常见。颞侧(n = 108;18.18%)脱位最常见,其次是上侧。127名患者(40.90%)的243只眼睛接受了有限玻璃体切除术。术前 BCVA 中位数为 1.0(范围:0.3-3.5 logMAR;20/40 - CF)。假性近视组术后 BCVA 中位数为 0.5 logMAR (6/18),无晶体眼组术后 BCVA 中位数为 0.6 logMAR (6/24)。假性近视组近视儿童的球面等值从-12.06 ± 6.84D降至-1.57D(-0.25D至-5.5D),无晶体眼组的球面等值为+9.3D(+5.5D至15.5D)。 这项研究是一项大规模的眼睑外翻患儿队列研究。干预后,整个队列的BCVA和屈光矫正中位数均有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
68
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Getting a clearer picture of myopia after the COVID-19 pandemic. Impact of atropine use for myopia control on intraocular pressure in children: A comprehensive review including postpupil dilation intraocular pressure changes. Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 restrictions on the efficacy of atropine 0.01% eyedrops for myopia control - Findings from the Western Australia Atropine for the Treatment of Myopia study. Myopic shift, refractive, and visual outcomes after 5 years of infantile cataract surgery: Our experience and review of literature. The impact of light properties on ocular growth and myopia development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1