Does cooperation with multiple actors diffuse the government’s responsibility in the implementation of COVID-19 measures?

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Social Science Japan Journal Pub Date : 2024-01-17 DOI:10.1093/ssjj/jyad027
T. Iseki, Sohei Shigemura, Shun Ikeda, Hideo Ishima
{"title":"Does cooperation with multiple actors diffuse the government’s responsibility in the implementation of COVID-19 measures?","authors":"T. Iseki, Sohei Shigemura, Shun Ikeda, Hideo Ishima","doi":"10.1093/ssjj/jyad027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n To manage the COVID-19 pandemic, the Japanese government has cooperated with multiple actors, such as experts, prefectural governments, and medical professionals, who generally attract limited attention in non-crisis times. While cooperation with such actors allows the central government to mobilize knowledge and utilize resources it does not have, such collaboration could diffuse the responsibility of COVID-19-related measures onto other actors. To empirically test this conjecture, we conducted an online survey experiment prior to the 2021 Japanese general election. It investigated whether the government’s cooperation with experts, prefectural governors, medical professionals, and the International Olympic Committee obscured its responsibility in the declaration of stay-at-home advisories, securing of beds, and conducting of the 2020 Summer Olympic Games. The results deliver no evidence that informing people of the influence of any actor diffused the government’s responsibility for the implementation of COVID-19-related measures. The findings of this study imply that the Japanese people held the national government accountable even during the COVID-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":44320,"journal":{"name":"Social Science Japan Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science Japan Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ssjj/jyad027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To manage the COVID-19 pandemic, the Japanese government has cooperated with multiple actors, such as experts, prefectural governments, and medical professionals, who generally attract limited attention in non-crisis times. While cooperation with such actors allows the central government to mobilize knowledge and utilize resources it does not have, such collaboration could diffuse the responsibility of COVID-19-related measures onto other actors. To empirically test this conjecture, we conducted an online survey experiment prior to the 2021 Japanese general election. It investigated whether the government’s cooperation with experts, prefectural governors, medical professionals, and the International Olympic Committee obscured its responsibility in the declaration of stay-at-home advisories, securing of beds, and conducting of the 2020 Summer Olympic Games. The results deliver no evidence that informing people of the influence of any actor diffused the government’s responsibility for the implementation of COVID-19-related measures. The findings of this study imply that the Japanese people held the national government accountable even during the COVID-19 pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与多方合作是否会分散政府在实施 COVID-19 措施方面的责任?
为管理 COVID-19 大流行,日本政府与专家、都道府县政府和医疗专业人员等多方合作,这些人在非危机时期通常很少受到关注。虽然与这些参与者的合作使中央政府能够调动知识并利用其不具备的资源,但这种合作可能会将 COVID-19 相关措施的责任分散给其他参与者。为了实证检验这一猜想,我们在 2021 年日本大选前进行了一次在线调查实验。实验调查了政府与专家、都道府县知事、医疗专业人士和国际奥委会的合作是否掩盖了政府在宣布居家休养建议、确保床位和举办 2020 年夏季奥运会方面的责任。研究结果显示,没有证据表明向民众宣传任何行为者的影响力都会分散政府在实施 COVID-19 相关措施中的责任。本研究的结果表明,即使在 COVID-19 大流行期间,日本人民也对国家政府负责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Social Science Japan Journal is a new forum for original scholarly papers on modern Japan. It publishes papers that cover Japan in a comparative perspective and papers that focus on international issues that affect Japan. All social science disciplines (economics, law, political science, history, sociology, and anthropology) are represented. All papers are refereed. The journal includes a book review section with substantial reviews of books on Japanese society, written in both English and Japanese. The journal occasionally publishes reviews of the current state of social science research on Japanese society in different countries.
期刊最新文献
Public Opinion and Expert Critique: Reconsidering the Role of Constitutional Scholars in Japan’s Security Policy Japan, the Sustainable Society: The Artisanal Ethos, Ordinary Virtues, and Everyday Life in the Age of Limits 47 Todōfuken no Chihō Jichi: ‘Shichōson e no Kengen Ijō’ ni miru Seido Unyō no Hikaku Kenkyū (Local Governance in the 47 Prefectures: Comparative Analysis of Institutional Operations in the Transfer of Authority to Municipalities) Sengo Nihon no Anzen Hoshō: Nichibei Dōmei, Kenpō 9 jō kara NSC made (Japan’s Postwar National Security: From the US-Japan Alliance and Article 9 to the NSC) Eleven Winters of Discontent: The Siberian Internment and the Making of a New Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1