Analysis of Patient Information and Differential Diagnosis with Clinical Reasoning in Pre-Clinical Medical Students

Dichitchai Mettarikanon, Weeratian Tawanwongsri
{"title":"Analysis of Patient Information and Differential Diagnosis with Clinical Reasoning in Pre-Clinical Medical Students","authors":"Dichitchai Mettarikanon, Weeratian Tawanwongsri","doi":"10.3390/ime3010003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The development of clinical reasoning (CR) abilities in Thai medical students during their pre-clinical years lacked well-designed establishment. Methods: This study utilized a pre-test and post-test design without a control group and was conducted at Walailak University, Thailand, in May 2022. We collected participant baseline characteristics and compared scores evaluated by the instructor and participants before and after the intervention. Additionally, we conducted a post-intervention survey on workshop satisfaction, perspectives on CR, and its learning impact. Results: Nineteen third-year medical students were included in the analysis, and twelve (63.2%) were women. The mean age was 20.6 years (standard deviation, SD: 0.5). The total score evaluated by the instructor after the intervention (8.95; SD, 1.81) was significantly higher than that before the intervention (1.68; SD, 0.67), p < 0.001. The total score evaluated by the participants after the intervention (8.22; SD = 1.44) was significantly higher than that before the intervention (2.34; SD, 2.06), p < 0.001. Overall, satisfaction was high. Conclusions: A short interactive workshop effectively taught CR principles and practice to Thai third-year medical students. These findings support the possibility of implementing this in pre-clinical curricula to prepare them for clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":510221,"journal":{"name":"International Medical Education","volume":"53 38","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ime3010003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The development of clinical reasoning (CR) abilities in Thai medical students during their pre-clinical years lacked well-designed establishment. Methods: This study utilized a pre-test and post-test design without a control group and was conducted at Walailak University, Thailand, in May 2022. We collected participant baseline characteristics and compared scores evaluated by the instructor and participants before and after the intervention. Additionally, we conducted a post-intervention survey on workshop satisfaction, perspectives on CR, and its learning impact. Results: Nineteen third-year medical students were included in the analysis, and twelve (63.2%) were women. The mean age was 20.6 years (standard deviation, SD: 0.5). The total score evaluated by the instructor after the intervention (8.95; SD, 1.81) was significantly higher than that before the intervention (1.68; SD, 0.67), p < 0.001. The total score evaluated by the participants after the intervention (8.22; SD = 1.44) was significantly higher than that before the intervention (2.34; SD, 2.06), p < 0.001. Overall, satisfaction was high. Conclusions: A short interactive workshop effectively taught CR principles and practice to Thai third-year medical students. These findings support the possibility of implementing this in pre-clinical curricula to prepare them for clinical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床医学预科学生的患者信息分析和鉴别诊断与临床推理
背景:泰国医科学生在临床前学习期间临床推理(CR)能力的发展缺乏精心设计的研究。研究方法本研究于 2022 年 5 月在泰国瓦莱拉克大学进行,采用前测和后测设计,不设对照组。我们收集了参与者的基线特征,并比较了干预前后教师和参与者的评估分数。此外,我们还就工作坊满意度、对 CR 的看法及其对学习的影响进行了干预后调查。结果:19名三年级医学生参与了分析,其中12名(63.2%)为女性。平均年龄为 20.6 岁(标准差:0.5)。干预后指导老师评估的总分(8.95;标准差,1.81)明显高于干预前的总分(1.68;标准差,0.67),P < 0.001。干预后学员评价的总分(8.22;标准差 = 1.44)明显高于干预前的总分(2.34;标准差,2.06),P < 0.001。总体而言,满意度较高。结论一个简短的互动研讨会有效地向泰国三年级医学生传授了 CR 原则和实践。这些研究结果支持在临床前课程中实施该方法,为临床实践做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Online Interest in Urology Residency: A Comprehensive Analysis of Current Internet Temporal and Geographic Patterns Assessment of Postgraduate Academic Productivity Following a Longitudinal Research Program in a Medical School Curriculum Mapping Dementia Care Technology: Tailored Digital Solutions across Stages Students’ Experiences with Interprofessional Service-Learning Global Health Education Pilot Program in Ghana Prescribing Competence of Canadian Medical Graduates: National Survey of Medical School Leaders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1