Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Rib Fracture Detection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Surgeries Pub Date : 2024-01-16 DOI:10.3390/surgeries5010005
Marnix C. L. van den Broek, Jorn H. Buijs, Liselotte F. M. Schmitz, Mathieu M E Wijffels
{"title":"Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Rib Fracture Detection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Marnix C. L. van den Broek, Jorn H. Buijs, Liselotte F. M. Schmitz, Mathieu M E Wijffels","doi":"10.3390/surgeries5010005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence (AI) is a promising tool for diagnosing rib fractures. To date, only a few studies have quantified its performance. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the accuracy of AI as an independent tool for rib fracture detection on CT scans or radiographs. This was defined as the combination of sensitivity and specificity. PubMed (including MEDLINE and PubMed Central) was systematically reviewed according to the PRISMA statement followed by citation searching among studies up to December 2022. Methods of the analysis and inclusion criteria were prespecified in a protocol and published on PROSPERO (CRD42023479590). Only diagnostic studies of independent AI tools for rib fracture detection on CT scans and X-rays reporting on sensitivity and/or specificity and written in English were included. Twelve studies met these criteria, which included 11,510 rib fractures in total. A quality assessment was performed using an altered version of QUADAS-2. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed on the included data. If specificity was not reported, it was calculated on a set of assumptions. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.85 (95% CI, 0.78–0.92) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94–0.97), respectively. None of the included studies used X-rays. Thus, it can be concluded that AI is accurate in detecting rib fractures on CT scans. Overall, these findings seemed quite robust, as can be concluded from the study quality assessment, therefore AI could potentially play a substantial role in the future of radiological diagnostics.","PeriodicalId":93623,"journal":{"name":"Surgeries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries5010005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a promising tool for diagnosing rib fractures. To date, only a few studies have quantified its performance. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the accuracy of AI as an independent tool for rib fracture detection on CT scans or radiographs. This was defined as the combination of sensitivity and specificity. PubMed (including MEDLINE and PubMed Central) was systematically reviewed according to the PRISMA statement followed by citation searching among studies up to December 2022. Methods of the analysis and inclusion criteria were prespecified in a protocol and published on PROSPERO (CRD42023479590). Only diagnostic studies of independent AI tools for rib fracture detection on CT scans and X-rays reporting on sensitivity and/or specificity and written in English were included. Twelve studies met these criteria, which included 11,510 rib fractures in total. A quality assessment was performed using an altered version of QUADAS-2. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed on the included data. If specificity was not reported, it was calculated on a set of assumptions. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.85 (95% CI, 0.78–0.92) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94–0.97), respectively. None of the included studies used X-rays. Thus, it can be concluded that AI is accurate in detecting rib fractures on CT scans. Overall, these findings seemed quite robust, as can be concluded from the study quality assessment, therefore AI could potentially play a substantial role in the future of radiological diagnostics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能在肋骨骨折检测中的诊断性能:系统回顾与元分析
人工智能(AI)是诊断肋骨骨折的一种前景广阔的工具。迄今为止,只有少数研究对其性能进行了量化。本系统性综述的目的是评估人工智能作为一种独立工具在 CT 扫描或射线照片上检测肋骨骨折的准确性。其定义为灵敏度和特异性的结合。根据PRISMA声明对PubMed(包括MEDLINE和PubMed Central)进行了系统性回顾,随后对截至2022年12月的研究进行了引文检索。分析方法和纳入标准在协议中预先规定,并发布在 PROSPERO (CRD42023479590) 上。只有对 CT 扫描和 X 光片进行肋骨骨折检测的独立 AI 工具的诊断研究才被纳入,这些研究报告了灵敏度和/或特异性,并且是用英语撰写的。有 12 项研究符合上述标准,共纳入 11,510 例肋骨骨折。研究采用QUADAS-2的改进版进行了质量评估。对纳入的数据进行了随机效应荟萃分析。如果未报告特异性,则根据一组假设计算特异性。汇总灵敏度和特异度分别为 0.85(95% CI,0.78-0.92)和 0.96(95% CI,0.94-0.97)。所纳入的研究均未使用 X 射线。因此,可以得出结论,人工智能能准确检测出 CT 扫描中的肋骨骨折。总之,从研究质量评估中可以得出结论,这些发现似乎相当可靠,因此人工智能有可能在未来的放射诊断中发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
N-Acetylcysteine’s Potential Role in Prophylaxis and Treatment of Pediatric Urinary Tract Infections: From Evidence to Patient-Side Research Transversus Abdominis Plane with Rectus Sheath Blocks Versus Port Site Infiltration of Local Anaesthesia in Emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy—Does It Reduce Postoperative Opiate Requirement? A Pilot Study Mechanisms of Degradation of Collagen or Gelatin Materials (Hemostatic Sponges) in Oral Surgery: A Systematic Review Cervical Necrotizing Fasciitis in Adults: A Life-Threatening Emergency in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery The Influence of Root Prominence on the Onset of Gingival Recession: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1