Cyber insurance risk analysis framework considerations

C. Rangu, Leonardo Badea, M. Șcheau, Larisa Găbudeanu, Iulian Panait, Valentin Radu
{"title":"Cyber insurance risk analysis framework considerations","authors":"C. Rangu, Leonardo Badea, M. Șcheau, Larisa Găbudeanu, Iulian Panait, Valentin Radu","doi":"10.1108/jrf-10-2023-0245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeIn recent years, the frequency and severity of cybersecurity incidents have prompted customers to seek out specialized insurance products. However, this has also presented insurers with operational challenges and increased costs. The assessment of risks for health systems and cyber–physical systems (CPS) necessitates a heightened degree of attention. The significant values of potential damages and claims request a solid insurance system, part of cyber-resilience. This research paper focuses on the emerging cyber insurance market that is currently in the process of standardizing and improving its risk analysis concerning the potential insured entity.Design/methodology/approachThe authors' approach involves a quantitative analysis utilizing a Likert-style questionnaire designed to survey cyber insurance professionals. The authors' aim is to identify the current methods used in gathering information from potential clients, as well as the manner in which this information is analyzed by the insurers. Additionally, the authors gather insights on potential improvements that could be made to this process.FindingsThe study the authors elaborated it has a particularly important cyber and risk components for insurance area, because it addresses a “niche” area not yet proper addressed in specialized literature – cyber insurance. Cyber risk management approaches are not uniform at the international level, nor at the insurer level. Also, not all insurers can perform solid assessments, especially since their companies should first prove that they are fully compliant with international cyber security standards.Research limitations/implicationsThis research has concentrated on analyzing the current practices in terms of gathering information about the insured entity before issuing the cyber insurance policy, level of details concerning the cyber security posture of the insured entity and way such information should be analyzed in a standardized and useful manner. The novelty of this research resides in the analysis performed as detailed above and the proposals in terms of information gathered, depth of analysis and standardization of approach made. Future work on the topic can focus on the standardization process for analyzing cyber risk for insurance clients, to improve the proposal based also on historical elements and trends in the market. Thus, future research can further refine the standardization process to analyze in more depth the way this can be implemented and included in relevant legislation at the EU level.Practical implicationsProposed improvements include proposals in terms of the level of detail and the usefulness of an independent centralized approach for information gathering and analysis, especially given the re-insurance and brokerage activities. The authors also propose a common practical procedural approach in risk management, with the involvement of insurance companies and certification institutions of cyber security auditors.Originality/valueThe study investigates the information gathered by insurers from potential clients of cyber insurance and the way this is analyzed and updated for issuance of the insurance policy.","PeriodicalId":22869,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Risk Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Risk Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jrf-10-2023-0245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeIn recent years, the frequency and severity of cybersecurity incidents have prompted customers to seek out specialized insurance products. However, this has also presented insurers with operational challenges and increased costs. The assessment of risks for health systems and cyber–physical systems (CPS) necessitates a heightened degree of attention. The significant values of potential damages and claims request a solid insurance system, part of cyber-resilience. This research paper focuses on the emerging cyber insurance market that is currently in the process of standardizing and improving its risk analysis concerning the potential insured entity.Design/methodology/approachThe authors' approach involves a quantitative analysis utilizing a Likert-style questionnaire designed to survey cyber insurance professionals. The authors' aim is to identify the current methods used in gathering information from potential clients, as well as the manner in which this information is analyzed by the insurers. Additionally, the authors gather insights on potential improvements that could be made to this process.FindingsThe study the authors elaborated it has a particularly important cyber and risk components for insurance area, because it addresses a “niche” area not yet proper addressed in specialized literature – cyber insurance. Cyber risk management approaches are not uniform at the international level, nor at the insurer level. Also, not all insurers can perform solid assessments, especially since their companies should first prove that they are fully compliant with international cyber security standards.Research limitations/implicationsThis research has concentrated on analyzing the current practices in terms of gathering information about the insured entity before issuing the cyber insurance policy, level of details concerning the cyber security posture of the insured entity and way such information should be analyzed in a standardized and useful manner. The novelty of this research resides in the analysis performed as detailed above and the proposals in terms of information gathered, depth of analysis and standardization of approach made. Future work on the topic can focus on the standardization process for analyzing cyber risk for insurance clients, to improve the proposal based also on historical elements and trends in the market. Thus, future research can further refine the standardization process to analyze in more depth the way this can be implemented and included in relevant legislation at the EU level.Practical implicationsProposed improvements include proposals in terms of the level of detail and the usefulness of an independent centralized approach for information gathering and analysis, especially given the re-insurance and brokerage activities. The authors also propose a common practical procedural approach in risk management, with the involvement of insurance companies and certification institutions of cyber security auditors.Originality/valueThe study investigates the information gathered by insurers from potential clients of cyber insurance and the way this is analyzed and updated for issuance of the insurance policy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络保险风险分析框架考虑因素
目的 近年来,网络安全事件的发生频率和严重程度促使客户寻求专门的保险产品。然而,这也给保险公司带来了运营挑战和成本增加。健康系统和网络物理系统(CPS)的风险评估需要引起高度关注。潜在损失和索赔的巨大价值要求建立一个稳固的保险系统,作为网络抗灾能力的一部分。本文的研究重点是新兴的网络保险市场,该市场目前正处于对潜在投保实体的风险分析进行标准化和改进的过程中。 设计/方法/途径 作者的研究方法包括利用李克特式问卷进行定量分析,该问卷旨在调查网络保险专业人士。作者的目的是确定目前用于收集潜在客户信息的方法,以及保险公司分析这些信息的方式。此外,作者还收集了对这一过程可能做出的改进的见解。研究结果作者阐述的这项研究对保险领域的网络和风险组成部分尤为重要,因为它涉及到一个专业文献尚未适当涉及的 "利基 "领域--网络保险。在国际层面和保险公司层面,网络风险管理方法并不统一。此外,并非所有保险公司都能进行可靠的评估,特别是因为他们的公司应首先证明自己完全符合国际网络安全标准。研究局限性/影响本研究集中分析了在签发网络保险单之前收集投保实体信息方面的现行做法、有关投保实体网络安全态势的详细程度以及以标准化和有用的方式分析这些信息的方法。本研究的新颖之处在于上文详述的分析以及在信息收集、分析深度和方法标准化方面提出的建议。今后的相关工作可以重点关注为保险客户分析网络风险的标准化流程,并根据市场的历史因素和趋势改进建议。因此,未来的研究可以进一步完善标准化流程,更深入地分析实施的方式,并将其纳入欧盟层面的相关立法中。建议的改进措施包括就信息收集和分析的详细程度和独立集中方法的实用性提出建议,特别是考虑到再保险和经纪活动。作者还建议在保险公司和网络安全审计员认证机构的参与下,在风险管理中采用共同的实用程序方法。原创性/价值该研究调查了保险公司从网络保险潜在客户那里收集的信息,以及分析和更新这些信息以签发保单的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why do firms list their shares in the US? The role of political uncertainty How do green bonds promote common prosperity? Evidence from Chinese prefecture-level cities Geopolitical risk and banking performance: evidence from emerging economies Temporary employment and financial distress in times of crisis Is tax avoidance one of the purposes of financial data manipulation? The case of Romania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1