Comparing the homogeneity and genotypes of large and small-scale coliving buildings in the modern Western world

Emad Alyedreessy, Ruth Dalton
{"title":"Comparing the homogeneity and genotypes of large and small-scale coliving buildings in the modern Western world","authors":"Emad Alyedreessy, Ruth Dalton","doi":"10.1108/arch-09-2023-0241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeContemporary coliving is a rapidly developing housing typology, characterised by high-density private living spaces integrated with various shared, mixed-use amenities. The purpose of this research is to quantitatively examine the spatial configurations of coliving building systems, and the integration of programmatic space labels, to provide insights for architects and researchers into the homogeneity and genotypical patterns embedded within these contexts.Design/methodology/approachColiving buildings of various scales from the United Kingdom and the USA were examined using small graph matching and inequality genotypes. The former was adopted to identify a genotype signature and assess homogeneity levels, whilst the latter provided a comparative analysis of the ranked integration values for space labels within these building systems.FindingsAlthough local samples exhibited superior levels of homogeneity compared to the sample population (n = 18), the latter still evinced a marked homogeneity and no statistical difference in building system integration (mean real relative asymmetry (RRA)). Local large-scale samples showed the greatest homogeneity and building system integration of all sample groups, whilst a statistically significant distinction in building system integration was evident between large- and small-scale samples. However, a comparison of space label integration (RRA) across different building scales demonstrated that a potential genotypical pattern exists between small- and large-scale samples.Originality/valueThrough the identification of homogeneity and integration values related to scale and location, this research establishes an empirical, methodological framework for the generalisable spatial analysis of contemporary coliving buildings. Furthermore, genotypical patterns provide insights into space labels that are most likely to encourage copresence and social encounters between residents.","PeriodicalId":503590,"journal":{"name":"Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/arch-09-2023-0241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeContemporary coliving is a rapidly developing housing typology, characterised by high-density private living spaces integrated with various shared, mixed-use amenities. The purpose of this research is to quantitatively examine the spatial configurations of coliving building systems, and the integration of programmatic space labels, to provide insights for architects and researchers into the homogeneity and genotypical patterns embedded within these contexts.Design/methodology/approachColiving buildings of various scales from the United Kingdom and the USA were examined using small graph matching and inequality genotypes. The former was adopted to identify a genotype signature and assess homogeneity levels, whilst the latter provided a comparative analysis of the ranked integration values for space labels within these building systems.FindingsAlthough local samples exhibited superior levels of homogeneity compared to the sample population (n = 18), the latter still evinced a marked homogeneity and no statistical difference in building system integration (mean real relative asymmetry (RRA)). Local large-scale samples showed the greatest homogeneity and building system integration of all sample groups, whilst a statistically significant distinction in building system integration was evident between large- and small-scale samples. However, a comparison of space label integration (RRA) across different building scales demonstrated that a potential genotypical pattern exists between small- and large-scale samples.Originality/valueThrough the identification of homogeneity and integration values related to scale and location, this research establishes an empirical, methodological framework for the generalisable spatial analysis of contemporary coliving buildings. Furthermore, genotypical patterns provide insights into space labels that are most likely to encourage copresence and social encounters between residents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较现代西方世界大型和小型联合居住建筑的同质性和基因型
目的当代联合居住是一种快速发展的住房类型,其特点是将高密度的私人生活空间与各种共享的、混合使用的设施结合在一起。本研究的目的是对联合居住建筑系统的空间配置以及程序空间标签的整合进行定量研究,为建筑师和研究人员提供有关这些环境中蕴含的同质性和基因型模式的见解。设计/方法/途径采用小型图匹配和不平等基因型对英国和美国不同规模的居住建筑进行了研究。研究结果尽管与样本群体(n = 18)相比,本地样本表现出更高的同质性,但后者仍然表现出明显的同质性,而且在建筑系统整合(平均实际相对不对称率 (RRA))方面没有统计差异。在所有样本组中,本地大型样本的同质性和建筑系统整合度最高,而大型样本和小型样本在建筑系统整合度方面则存在明显的统计学差异。原创性/价值通过识别与规模和位置相关的同质性和整合值,本研究为当代联合居住建筑的通用空间分析建立了一个经验性的方法框架。此外,基因型模式还提供了对最有可能鼓励住户之间共同居住和社交接触的空间标签的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contextualised strategies and interventions for ageing in place in low-population density areas Beyond the grand narrative of Al Bastakiya: Ayesha Al Bastaki and the Windtower houses of Old Dubai Designing and building in a fragile context: the recovery of the primary school in Wadi Abu Hindi, Palestine A hybrid modelling approach for information processing workflow in inter-cultural heritage projects Women, sustainable development and heritage regeneration in Qatar and Bahrain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1