Hemiplegia in acute ischemic stroke: A comprehensive review of case studies and the role of intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy

Ibrain Pub Date : 2024-01-13 DOI:10.1002/ibra.12146
Karen Adriana Carrillo Navarrete, Christian Chapa González
{"title":"Hemiplegia in acute ischemic stroke: A comprehensive review of case studies and the role of intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy","authors":"Karen Adriana Carrillo Navarrete,&nbsp;Christian Chapa González","doi":"10.1002/ibra.12146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Acute ischemic stroke is a significant health concern worldwide, often leading to long-term disability and decreased quality of life. Rapid and appropriate treatment is crucial for achieving optimal outcomes in these patients. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are two commonly used interventions for acute ischemic stroke, but their effectiveness in improving neurological symptoms and functional outcomes in patients with hemiplegia remains uncertain. The aim of this work was to evaluate the impact of IVT and MT within a 4.5-h time frame on patients with acute ischemic stroke and hemiplegia. A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Relevant studies that assessed the impact of IVT and MT within 4.5-h on hemiplegia in patients with an acute ischemic stroke were included. Data were extracted and analyzed to determine the overall effects of these interventions. Most included case reports indicate positive outcomes in terms of neurological symptom improvement and functional recovery in patients with hemiplegia after receiving IVT and MT within the specified time frame. However, the heterogeneity among the patients and the limited use of IVT due to contraindications posed challenges in determining the most effective treatment option. The findings from the included studies demonstrate that both interventions led to a decrease in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores, indicating an improvement in neurological symptoms. The results highlight the beneficial effects of early thrombolytic interventions and MT on the neurological status and functional outcomes of patients with an acute ischemic stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":94030,"journal":{"name":"Ibrain","volume":"10 1","pages":"59-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ibra.12146","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ibrain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ibra.12146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute ischemic stroke is a significant health concern worldwide, often leading to long-term disability and decreased quality of life. Rapid and appropriate treatment is crucial for achieving optimal outcomes in these patients. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are two commonly used interventions for acute ischemic stroke, but their effectiveness in improving neurological symptoms and functional outcomes in patients with hemiplegia remains uncertain. The aim of this work was to evaluate the impact of IVT and MT within a 4.5-h time frame on patients with acute ischemic stroke and hemiplegia. A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Relevant studies that assessed the impact of IVT and MT within 4.5-h on hemiplegia in patients with an acute ischemic stroke were included. Data were extracted and analyzed to determine the overall effects of these interventions. Most included case reports indicate positive outcomes in terms of neurological symptom improvement and functional recovery in patients with hemiplegia after receiving IVT and MT within the specified time frame. However, the heterogeneity among the patients and the limited use of IVT due to contraindications posed challenges in determining the most effective treatment option. The findings from the included studies demonstrate that both interventions led to a decrease in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores, indicating an improvement in neurological symptoms. The results highlight the beneficial effects of early thrombolytic interventions and MT on the neurological status and functional outcomes of patients with an acute ischemic stroke.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性缺血性中风偏瘫:病例研究综述以及静脉溶栓和机械取栓术的作用
急性缺血性脑卒中是全球关注的重大健康问题,通常会导致长期残疾和生活质量下降。快速、适当的治疗是这些患者获得最佳预后的关键。静脉溶栓(IVT)和机械血栓切除术(MT)是急性缺血性中风的两种常用干预方法,但它们在改善偏瘫患者神经症状和功能预后方面的效果仍不确定。本研究旨在评估在 4.5 小时内进行 IVT 和 MT 对急性缺血性卒中偏瘫患者的影响。我们按照《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南进行了系统综述。纳入了评估 4.5 小时内 IVT 和 MT 对急性缺血性卒中患者偏瘫影响的相关研究。对数据进行了提取和分析,以确定这些干预措施的总体效果。大多数纳入的病例报告显示,在规定时间内接受 IVT 和 MT 治疗的偏瘫患者在神经症状改善和功能恢复方面取得了积极成果。然而,患者之间的异质性以及因禁忌症而限制 IVT 的使用给确定最有效的治疗方案带来了挑战。纳入研究的结果表明,两种干预方法都能降低美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分,表明神经症状有所改善。研究结果凸显了早期溶栓干预和 MT 对急性缺血性卒中患者神经功能状态和功能预后的有利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Identification of immune infiltration and PANoptosis-related molecular clusters and predictive model in Alzheimer's disease based on transcriptome analysis The application of eXplainable artificial intelligence in studying cognition: A scoping review Neuroscience of cancer: Research progress and emerging of the field Calcium accumulation or iron deposition: Delving into the temporal sequence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis pathophysiology in the primary motor cortex
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1