‘Hunger for certainty’: misrecognition, masculinity and agentic action in India’s and Russia’s desires for neocolonial subjecthood

IF 1.8 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Global Discourse Pub Date : 2024-01-12 DOI:10.1332/20437897y2023d000000032
Catarina Kinnvall, Ted Svensson
{"title":"‘Hunger for certainty’: misrecognition, masculinity and agentic action in India’s and Russia’s desires for neocolonial subjecthood","authors":"Catarina Kinnvall, Ted Svensson","doi":"10.1332/20437897y2023d000000032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article takes as its point of departure the postcolonial understanding of the nation as a subject constructed through the colonial encounter. It argues that at the core of both colonial and postcolonial subject formations lies a desire for reconstructing a homogeneous nation that fulfils a ‘hunger for certainty’. The use of the term ‘hunger for certainty’ testifies to the emotional as well as corporeal desires involved in the quest for recognition. However, any such quest is always a process of misrecognition, involving fantasies of impossible wholeness and fulfilment. Proceeding from a Lacanian account of sublimation, lack and desire, we analyse the relationship between misrecognition, ontological insecurity, masculinity and agentic action in two neocolonial settings: Russia and India. By discursively deconstructing the official discourse of those speaking in the name of the state – in our case, Vladimir Putin and Narendra Modi – we show how this ‘hunger for certainty’ is at the core of neocolonial agentic action and how desires for recognition are constantly underpinned by masculinity and unfulfilled desires for wholeness.","PeriodicalId":37814,"journal":{"name":"Global Discourse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Discourse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/20437897y2023d000000032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article takes as its point of departure the postcolonial understanding of the nation as a subject constructed through the colonial encounter. It argues that at the core of both colonial and postcolonial subject formations lies a desire for reconstructing a homogeneous nation that fulfils a ‘hunger for certainty’. The use of the term ‘hunger for certainty’ testifies to the emotional as well as corporeal desires involved in the quest for recognition. However, any such quest is always a process of misrecognition, involving fantasies of impossible wholeness and fulfilment. Proceeding from a Lacanian account of sublimation, lack and desire, we analyse the relationship between misrecognition, ontological insecurity, masculinity and agentic action in two neocolonial settings: Russia and India. By discursively deconstructing the official discourse of those speaking in the name of the state – in our case, Vladimir Putin and Narendra Modi – we show how this ‘hunger for certainty’ is at the core of neocolonial agentic action and how desires for recognition are constantly underpinned by masculinity and unfulfilled desires for wholeness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对确定性的渴求":印度和俄罗斯对新殖民主义主体性的渴望中的错误认识、男性气质和代理行动
本文以后殖民主义对民族的理解为出发点,认为民族是通过殖民遭遇建构起来的主体。文章认为,殖民时期和后殖民时期主体形成的核心都是渴望重建一个同质的民族,以满足 "对确定性的渴望"。对确定性的渴望 "一词的使用证明了在寻求承认的过程中所涉及的情感和肉体欲望。然而,任何这样的追求都是一个误认的过程,涉及对不可能的完整和满足的幻想。从拉康对升华、匮乏和欲望的论述出发,我们分析了在两个新殖民主义背景下,错误认知、本体论的不安全感、男性气质和代理行动之间的关系:俄罗斯和印度。通过对那些以国家名义发言的人--在我们的案例中是弗拉基米尔-普京和纳伦德拉-莫迪--的官方话语进行话语解构,我们展示了这种 "对确定性的渴望 "是如何成为新殖民主义代理人行动的核心的,以及对认可的渴望是如何不断受到男性气质和未实现的整体性渴望的支撑的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Discourse
Global Discourse Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Global Discourse is an interdisciplinary, problem-oriented journal of applied contemporary thought operating at the intersection of politics, international relations, sociology and social policy. The journal’s scope is broad, encouraging interrogation of current affairs with regard to core questions of distributive justice, wellbeing, cultural diversity, autonomy, sovereignty, security and recognition. All issues are themed and aimed at addressing pressing issues as they emerge.
期刊最新文献
‘What do we exactly have the power to decolonise?’ A reply to ‘(Un)Doing performative decolonisation in the global development “imaginaries” of academia’ by Two Convivial Thinkers Black feminist political ecologies: a reply to ‘Questioning development from Black feminisms in Ecuador and moving towards a Black feminist political ecology in the Americas’ by Sofia Zaragocin et al Introduction: New perspectives on development A reply to ‘Human security, sustainable livelihoods and development: the case of the Niger Delta region in Nigeria’ by Benita Ebindu Siloko Human security, sustainable livelihoods and development: the case of the Niger Delta region in Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1