Ecotoxicological effects of personal care products on the sea urchin Echinometra lucunter

IF 1 Q4 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science Pub Date : 2024-01-12 DOI:10.1680/jenes.22.00094
Luciano Cristian Cabral, V. Roveri, F. S. Cortez, Karla Aparecida Vasconcelos Alves da Cruz, Nicolau Teixeira Ramos, F. H. Pusceddu, L. Guimarães
{"title":"Ecotoxicological effects of personal care products on the sea urchin Echinometra lucunter","authors":"Luciano Cristian Cabral, V. Roveri, F. S. Cortez, Karla Aparecida Vasconcelos Alves da Cruz, Nicolau Teixeira Ramos, F. H. Pusceddu, L. Guimarães","doi":"10.1680/jenes.22.00094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Personal care products (PCPs) are increasingly studied worldwide to better understand their ecotoxicological effects on different aquatic species. However, studies assessing their ecotoxicological effects on tropical marine aquatic organisms are still scarce. To address this information gap, this study aimed to evaluate the acute and chronic toxicity of three PCPs: Methylparaben (MP), Propylparaben (PP), and Butylhydroxytoluene (BHT) on the tropical sea urchin Echinometra lucunter. The procedures were based on the protocols established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA, 2009) and the Brazilian National Standards (ABNT NBR 15350, 2012). Predictive computational tools (OPERA QSAR and VEGA QSAR) were used to evaluate the persistence/biodegradability, bioaccumulation, and mobility of PCPs. Acute exposure results showed the following ranking of toxicity: BHT (IC50 = 38.14 mg.L−1) >PP (IC50 = 73.20 mg.L−1) >MP (IC50 = 74.47 mg.L−1). Chronic toxicity tests indicated that BHT presented the lowest IC50 (6.85 mg.L−1), followed by PP (IC50 = 15.57 mg.L−1) and MP (IC50 = 20.09 mg.L−1). Additionally, in silico predictions support the findings related to the potential risks of these PCPs in aquatic ecosystems. The data obtained in this study can support future analyses of environmental risk concerning PCPs and support the establishment of concentration limits in relevant legislation.","PeriodicalId":15665,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jenes.22.00094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Personal care products (PCPs) are increasingly studied worldwide to better understand their ecotoxicological effects on different aquatic species. However, studies assessing their ecotoxicological effects on tropical marine aquatic organisms are still scarce. To address this information gap, this study aimed to evaluate the acute and chronic toxicity of three PCPs: Methylparaben (MP), Propylparaben (PP), and Butylhydroxytoluene (BHT) on the tropical sea urchin Echinometra lucunter. The procedures were based on the protocols established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA, 2009) and the Brazilian National Standards (ABNT NBR 15350, 2012). Predictive computational tools (OPERA QSAR and VEGA QSAR) were used to evaluate the persistence/biodegradability, bioaccumulation, and mobility of PCPs. Acute exposure results showed the following ranking of toxicity: BHT (IC50 = 38.14 mg.L−1) >PP (IC50 = 73.20 mg.L−1) >MP (IC50 = 74.47 mg.L−1). Chronic toxicity tests indicated that BHT presented the lowest IC50 (6.85 mg.L−1), followed by PP (IC50 = 15.57 mg.L−1) and MP (IC50 = 20.09 mg.L−1). Additionally, in silico predictions support the findings related to the potential risks of these PCPs in aquatic ecosystems. The data obtained in this study can support future analyses of environmental risk concerning PCPs and support the establishment of concentration limits in relevant legislation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个人护理产品对海胆 Echinometra lucunter 的生态毒理学影响
为了更好地了解个人护理品(PCPs)对不同水生物种的生态毒理学影响,全世界对其进行了越来越多的研究。然而,评估其对热带海洋水生生物生态毒理影响的研究仍然很少。针对这一信息空白,本研究旨在评估三种五氯苯酚的急性和慢性毒性:苯甲酸甲酯(MP)、苯甲酸丙酯(PP)和丁基羟基甲苯(BHT)对热带海胆 Echinometra lucunter 的急性和慢性毒性。检测程序基于美国环境保护局(USEPA,2009 年)和巴西国家标准(ABNT NBR 15350,2012 年)制定的规程。预测计算工具(OPERA QSAR 和 VEGA QSAR)用于评估五氯苯酚的持久性/生物降解性、生物累积性和流动性。急性接触结果显示出以下毒性等级:BHT(IC50 = 38.14 mg.L-1)>PP(IC50 = 73.20 mg.L-1)>MP(IC50 = 74.47 mg.L-1)。慢性毒性测试表明,BHT 的 IC50 最低(6.85 mg.L-1),其次是 PP(IC50 = 15.57 mg.L-1)和 MP(IC50 = 20.09 mg.L-1)。此外,硅学预测也支持与这些五氯苯酚在水生生态系统中的潜在风险有关的研究结果。本研究获得的数据可为今后有关五氯苯酚的环境风险分析提供支持,并有助于在相关立法中制定浓度限值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science is an international, peer-reviewed publication providing a forum for the dissemination of environmental research, encouraging interdisciplinary research collaboration to address environmental problems. It addresses all aspects of environmental engineering and applied environmental science, with the exception of noise, radiation and light.
期刊最新文献
Assessing seasonal changes in water quality using various indices in Chenab River and its tributaries (J&K) Correlation of soil magnetic susceptibility with heavy metals and physicochemical profile Insight into adsorption mechanism, modeling, and desirability function of malachite green by sediment of Oued Sebou (Morocco): Box-Behnken design application Synthesis and application of a new chitosan derivative for adsorption of Cu(II) and oxyanions of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution Synthesis and application of a new chitosan derivative for adsorption of Cu(II) and oxyanions of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1